Thursday, August 3, 2017

Retired generals, admirals thank Trump for announcing ban on transgender troops!

The Washington Times ^ | August 1, 2017 | Rowan Scarborough and Carlo Muñoz 

More than a dozen retired generals and admirals have signed a letter to President Trump thanking him for his announced policy to ban transgender people from the armed forces.
“We write today to express our gratitude to you for making the extremely courageous decision to reverse President Obama’s transgender social experiment,” the conservative retired flag officers wrote. “There may be an enormous amount of vitriol directed at you for making this policy correction, but please know that overturning this policy may have done more in the long-term to save the culture and war-fighting capacity of the U.S. military than perhaps any other military policy you will adopt as president.”
The letter came as the Palm Center, a research nonprofit that promotes the LGBT agenda, released a competing statement from 56 retired admirals and generals who say reimposing the ban will hurt readiness, not help it.
“The Commander in Chief has tweeted a total ban of honorably serving transgender troops,” the statement said. “This proposed ban, if implemented, would cause significant disruptions, deprive the military of mission-critical talent, and compromise the integrity of transgender troops who would be forced to live a lie, as well as non-transgender peers who would be forced to choose between reporting their comrades or disobeying policy.”
Among the statement’s signatories: retired Marine Gen. John Allen, former deputy commander of U.S. Central Command; retired Vice Adm. Donald Arthur, former surgeon general of the Navy; and retired Lt. Gen. Claudia Kennedy, the first woman to achieve three-star rank in the Army.....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

A New Title For Hillary Rodham Clinton


Hillary has a new title.

For years, she has basked in being addressed as "The Honorable This" or "The Honorable That."

First it was the wife of the Attorney General of Arkansas, (well, someone has to be), married to some dweeb named Bill. Then it was First Lady of Arkansas, then First Lady of the United States, (although anyone who watched the Clintons knew she was not his first lady, nor on any given day his latest!)
Then the titles were Senator, then Democratic Nominee-Presumptive, Then Madame Secretary, then Madam President-Presumptive.... but now, horror or horrors, NO TITLE.

So, obviously, a bunch of us old retired DC types sitting around after a good 18 holes, decided she needed a new title.

We have a new title for her:


No, it does not refer to her drinking habits. It refers to the well-known fact that she and Bill have not done the Horizontal Mambo (also knows as "The Dance With No Steps") in years, if not decades. Despite all the PR BS about Hillary being so upset about Monica, she has known for years that Bill has his women.... as she has hers....
They kept each other's secrets, sort of. It is no secret that she and Huma are..... shall we say.... close.
So, with Bill as nothing more than her beard, the new title is: >p>

Hillary Clinton, WINO, "Wife In Name Only!"

Savor it!

Hillary to Dump Bill

globe ^ | 2 Aug 17 | hapHal 

Furious Hillary Clinton has dumped horndog hubby Bill — once and for all — after discovering a hidden love nest atop his presidential library in Little Rock, Ark., where he beds starstruck beauties!

Now fed-up Hillary — who lost to Donald Trump in last year’s presidential election — is talking to lawyers and demanding a $350 million divorce settlement, sources say. “Hillary doesn’t need Bill anymore — and his secret, taxpayer-funded sex den was the final humiliation,” says a source.

“She confronted Bill and told him: ‘It’s OVER!’ ” President Barack Obama’s former secretary of state doesn’t “have any more use for Bill,” says the source. “She’s never running for office again so she doesn’t have to worry about how a divorce will impact her political career.”

Does Donald Trump deserve a chance?

August 03, 2017 08:35 IST

While political observers are unable to make head or tail of the US President, those moving in high business and industry circles tell B S Raghavan that Trump's style is exactly that of an aggressive and successful businessman.

United States President Donald J Trump, both during his campaign and after assuming office, has stood on their head all the canons held sacrosanct by students of leadership, management, public administration and governance.
He has, in fact, set at naught a whole corpus of literature, and centuries of practice and experience, in the art and science of running organisations, conducting negotiations, maintaining inter-personal relations, promoting teamwork, and taking decisions.
He minces no words in conveying face-to-face or by tweets what he thinks the very instant he thinks it.
No one is at any time in any doubt as to what he thinks of an issue or an individual.
In the course of Presidential debates in the run-up to the election, the words and phrases he used against Hillary Clinton were decidedly unparliamentary. He called her 'that woman' in one debate, and, in another, publicly vowed to have her jailed if he was elected.
He has been continuing his vituperative attacks on the media to this day, singling out correspondents, publications and television channels by name.
Neither has he spared people he himself appointed to high-profile positions in his administration.
Over the last week, he has been hurling barbs at his Attorney General Jeff Sessions.
Within the brief period of six months, 17 top appointees have either resigned (11), or been fired (6).
Among them are the acting attorney general, his chief of staffnational security advisorFBI directorpress secretary and White House communications director.
He seems to be living up to the punch line 'You're fired!' of the game show The Apprentice he hosted before he was elected President.
On the international plane, Trump has rattled a number of leaders and countries by going public with his incendiary comments.
He summarily scrapped both the Trans Pacific Partnership and the Paris Climate Agreement.
NATO (The North Atlantic Treaty Organisation) has also drawn his ire, and he has expressed himself at cross purposes with the policies of many members of the G-20.
The fate of several other agreements and treaties, and American installations, bases and enterprises abroad, is hanging fire.

The most high-profile exits of the Trump administration

When Trump joked about replacing Nikki Haley as UN ambassador

His tweets, rather than formal government notifications or US Congressional resolutions, have begun promulgating policies. He told the joint media meet with Prime Minister Narendra Modi, on June 26 that he was 'proud to announce to the media, to the American people and to the Indian people that Prime Minister Modi and I are world leaders in social media. We're believers.'
He outlined the rationale behind it thus: 'Giving the citizens of our countries the opportunity to hear directly from their elected officials and for us to hear directly from them... I guess it's worked very well in both cases.'
There have been US Presidents who stamped their unique and unforgettable personality on national politics and governance. The names of Abraham Lincoln, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, Teddy Roosevelt, Harry Truman and John F Kennedy readily come to mind.
But they functioned within the confines of established organisational systems and procedures.
Observers of the US political scene, long habituated to elected officials, especially at the highest level, conducting themselves in a particular mode, are in a fix, unable to make head or tail of Trump, sometimes calling him a maverick, sometimes plain mad.
They would not have so much minded a change or even reversal or repeal of policies and strategies, in any of the areas of governance, or even a root-and-branch reform in the structure of the government.
But Trump is the first US President who seems to thrive on self-generated chaos, and even is sure of getting the desired results out of it.
Looked at from another perspective, he seems to be applying the techniques of 'creative destruction' to governance, not for the purpose for which Joseph Schumpeter coined the expression, but somewhat on the analogy of the cosmic dance of Lord Shiva, the God of Destruction, of Indian mythology.
His Rudra Thandava, performed in an aureole of fire, created wild thunderstorms all around the universe, even shattering the sun, the moon and stellar bodies.
This is the prospect that alarms observers.
The US commands such gravitational pull politically, economically, technologically and militarily that any disruptive forces unleashed there have a multiplier effect on the rest of the world.
Also, hitherto, the US was the one power which, rightly or wrongly, acted as the world's policeman, taking responsibility, according to its lights, for establishing and maintaining some sort of an international order. But for contributions from the US coffers, many international institutions, including the UN, will totter, or cease to exist.
Orderly functioning of the US political system, and observance of processes of governance as per known norms become, therefore, the sine qua non for stability and progress within the country and promotion of smooth and harmonious relations with other countries.
Those moving in high business and industry circles and familiar with the current trends in business administration in the US discount the applicability of these ponderous precepts to fast-moving turbulent times.
They tell me that Trump's style is exactly that of an aggressive and successful businessman: Eye on the ball, restless for results, take aim, shoot the arrow, pros and cons be damned.
A July 2 write-up, 'Why Mr Trump deserves a chance to govern' in The Washington Times, a part of the mainstream media not usually sympathetic to Trump, by the wife of a former secretary of commerce for President George H W Bush, and, therefore, belonging to the inner circle, puts it thus:
'If Donald Trump's standard of behaviour gets the job done, perhaps that standard should become the new normal. It is time to reset protocol to something that will better serve the nation. We should redefine what is presidential to take account of results, as in the business world. A businessman defines a problem, finds a solution, and acts. Yes, the president's decisive style of action doesn't always follow protocol, but it moves the ball…
'Conformity with the past will lead only to more stagnation. Instead of criticizing the businessman president who gets the job done, we should applaud him... Who is to say that the way things have always been done is the right way? Obviously, those who voted for Mr Trump to "make America great again" didn't feel served by the status quo. Some in power may be intimidated by the change that the new president brings — but those who elected him crave it.
'But the Trump way is working. Supporters are happy that he is challenging the way things have always been done. They feel closer to the presidency than ever before, because this president doesn't go through media consultants. He says it how he sees it -- unfiltered.
'At the end of the day, if Mr Trump's new way of doing things fails, Washington can always go back to doing things the way they have always been done. But first we owe it to our nation's future to give Mr Trump a chance.'
Amen, but with trepidation!
B S Raghavan is a former member of the Indian Administrative Service and was a Policy Adviser to the UN (FAO) and US Congressional Fellow.
He has held wide leadership positions in the state and central governments, including charge of the Political and Security Policy Planning Division of the Union ministry of home affairs.
He was also the chief secretary of a state.
He is a frequent commentator on national and international affairs.

B S Raghavan

Immigration: How Trump Derangement Syndrome Dumbs Down the Press

PJ Media ^ | August 2, 2017 | Roger L. Simon 

How many IQ points do you lose from Trump Derangement Syndrome or similar conditions of blind political rage?
I was asking myself that while listening to the stupefying question asked of Trump adviser Stephen Miller by CNN's Jim Acosta at Wednesday's White House press conference. Miller had been explaining -- with a level of clarity and specificity not often seen at these events -- the immigration proposal being proffered by Sens. Tom Cotton and David Perdue and now being backed by the president. The press audience appeared impatient with these details, however, waiting to pounce as it almost always does.
And the pounce came from Acosta, who was irked the proposal listed some level of facility with the English language as one of the new preference points for possible immigration applicants. Wasn't that de facto discrimination in favor of people from the UK and Australia (read: white skin privilege)?
Earth to Acosta: As of 2015, there were 54 sovereign states and 27 non-sovereign entities where English was an official language. These include India (population: 1,247,540,000), Pakistan (199,085,847), Nigeria (182,202,000), the Philippines (102,885,100), Tanzania (51,820,000) and Kenya (45,010,056) among, obviously, many others. In China (population 1.39 billion), almost all school children begin English in the third grade. In Japan, South Korea and Singapore, it's also mandatory beginning about the same time.....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

A Teacher Story

Posted on 8/3/2017, 6:35:00 AM by sodpoodle


A group of 3rd, 4th, and 5th graders, accompanied by two female teachers, went on a field trip to the local racetrack(Churchill Downs) to learn about thoroughbred horses and the supporting industry (Bourbon), but mostly to see the horses.
When it was time to take the children to the bathroom, it was decided that the girls would go with one teacher and the boys would go with the other.
The teacher assigned to the boys was waiting outside the men's room when one of the boys came out and told her that none of them could reach the urinal.
Having no choice, she went inside, helped the boys with their pants, and began hoisting the little boys up one by one, holding on to their little 'wee-wees' to direct the flow away from their clothes.
As she lifted one little guy, she couldn't help but notice that he was unusually well endowed.
Trying not to show that she was staring, the teacher said, "You must be in the 5th grade."
"No ma'am", he replied;

"I'm riding Silver Arrow in the seventh race, but I appreciate your help."

Ellison's Cuba Healthcare Romance-Praise for a tyranny from the deputy chair of the DNC (the Muslim Democrat)

Frontpagemagazine ^ | August 3, 2017 | Humberto Fontova 

Democratic Party Leader Claims: “Cuba has better healthcare outcomes than the U.S.”
“The countries like Cuba or Canada or Russia or a lot of places in this world spend half what we spend per capita and they got better health outcomes than we do,” (deputy chair of the Democratic National Committee Rep. Keith Ellison, July 24th)
But why pick on Rep. Ellison? Adulation for the putrid disaster known as Castroite “healthcare” seems indigenous to Democrat Party DNA. To wit:
“Castro brought superb systems of healthcare and education to his people.” (Jimmy Carter, 2002.)
“The United States recognizes the progress that (Castro’s) Cuba has made as a nation, its enormous achievements in education and in health care.” (Pres. Barack Obama March, 2016.)
Now over to the Democrat Party’s public relations subsidiaries:
 “One of Cuba's greatest prides is its health care system. (PBS’ Ray Suarez reporting from Havana.)
“Cuba could serve as 'a model for health care reform in the United States' ” (CNN’s Morgan Neil.)
‘Castro has brought great healthcare to his country.” (ABC’s Barbara Walters)
Now  regarding what Pres. Obama called Cuba’s “progress,” Websters defines the word “progress” as: “gradual betterment; especially:  the progressive development of humankind.”
So let’s see: in 1958 (the year prior to Castro’s revolution) robustly capitalist Cuba had the 13th lowest infant-mortality rate in the world. This put her not only at the top in Latin America but atop most of Western Europe, ahead of France, Belgium, West Germany, Israel, Japan, Austria, Italy, Spain and Portugal. Today all of these countries leave Communist Cuba in the dust, with much lower infant mortality rates.
And even plummeting from 13th (capitalist) to 43th (communist Cuba’s ranking today) Cuba's "impressive" infant mortality rate is kept artificially low by Communist chicanery with statistics and by a truly appalling abortion rate of 0.71 abortions per live birth. This is the hemisphere's highest, by far. Any Cuban pregnancy that even hints at trouble gets "terminated."
A few years ago, Dr. Juan Felipe García, MD, of Jacksonville, Fla., interviewed several recent doctor defectors from Cuba. Based on what he heard, he reported the following:
"The official Cuban infant-mortality figure is a farce. Cuban pediatricians constantly falsify figures for the regime. If an infant dies during its first year, the doctors often report he was older. Otherwise, such lapses could cost him severe penalties and his job."
This might lead a few people to question Cuba's official infant-mortality figures. But such people would not get a Havana bureau for their news agency, much less a visa to film a documentary (Michael Moore, Sicko.)

According to a report by the Association of American Physicians and Surgeons, more than 75% of “doctors” with Cuban “medical degrees” flunk the exam given by the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates for licensing in the U.S. Most Cuba-certified doctors even flunk the Educational Commission for Foreign Medical Graduates’ exam for certification as “physician assistants,” making them barely fit even as nurses.
Please, amigos!  None of this is meant to disparage these hapless Cuban men and women who were simply cursed by fate to be born under a Stalinist tyranny. And please perish any idea that I’m disparaging U.S. nurses! In fact, I’ve been served by many nurses who –in expertise and diligence—shamed the bona-fide M.D. they worked for!....But hopefully you get my point.
In fact, ninety-nine percent of Cubans have no more experience with hospitals like the one Michael Moore featured in Sicko and CNN's features in its “reports,” than Moore has with a Soloflex or Nordic Track. Most Cubans view these hospitals the way most college boys view Girls Gone Wild videos and husbands view Victoria Secrets Catalogue: "Wow! If only…?!”
Two generations ago, as mentioned above, Cuban doctors were among the most respected on earth—and not by political hacks, pompous frauds and communist agents (i.e. mainstream media) as are Cuban doctors today.
Surely the statement above branding as “Communist agents” the respected health professionals eagerly beckoned and reverentially quoted by the U.S. media strikes many readers as unnecessarily “hyperbolic”-- if not downright “Mc Carthyite,” right?
“Have you no sense of decency, Mr Fontova? At long last, have you left no sense of decency?”
Objection sustained. So let’s have a closer look at this issue: The U.S. media’s veritable “go-to-person” on Cuban healthcare (besides Michael Moore) is Gail Reed. CNN, a major media fan of Gail Reed’s “impartial expertise”, calls her “a Medical Expert.”
Now over at MSNBC, Andrea Mitchell whose eagerly-issued “journalist’ visa by the Communist regime makes it easy for her to often “interview” Gail Reed on location in Havana for NBC cameras, describes her as: “international director of the nonprofit group Medical Education Cooperation.”
During the 1990s Reed also functioned as executive producer for NBC News Havana bureau--a pretty plum position for a communist intelligence apparatchik, no? Not that NBC revealed Gail Reed’s genuine “credentials.”
Because you see, amigos: for the past 36 years Havana resident Gail Reed has been married to an officer of Cuba’s Directorio General de Intelligencia (spy service) named Julian Torres Rizo. This KGB-trained apparatchik recruited Reed back in 1969 when she visited Cuba as a member of the (DGI-created) Venceremos Brigades of “starry-eyed” U.S. college kids. Obama’s future “neighbors” Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dohrn, by the way, served as recruiters for these Venceremos Brigades. This was an important function as leaders of the terrorist group Weather Underground.
“Your society must be destroyed!” the KGB-trained Rizo coached his eager hippie recruits in Cuba. “It is now your duty to help destroy your society!” Reed was so enchanted with Stalinist, terror-sponsoring Cuba that she moved there and became a top writer for Cuba’s Communist party press.
Not that any American viewers imbibing her reports on the marvels of Cuba’s healthcare and the wickedness of the U.S. “Blockade” of her adopted country in those “mainstream” media organs might have guessed any of Gail Reed’s background. For such illuminating (to most of us) and infuriating (to the Castro regime and its multitude of U.S.-based agents) disclosures it greatly helps to go here.
As luck would have it, the farce of Cuba’s “healthcare” as spread by Democrats and their Fake News media auxiliaries was the topic of a rollicking presentation at a Young Americas Foundation conference just last week.

U.S. Military Infiltrated By Alien Recruits?

Frontpagemagazine ^ | August 3, 2017 | Michael Cutler 

Pentagon investigators discover fatal flaws in vetting process.

On August 1, 2017, Fox News reported the worrying headline, "Pentagon investigators find ‘security risks’ in government's immigrant recruitment program, ‘infiltration’ feared."
Military bases are among the most sensitive facilities to be found in the United States. Classified materials, weapons and, of course, our members of the armed forces, can all be found on every military base. Time and again, we have seen terrorists in the Middle East carry out “Insider Attacks” by joining the military or police and then, when the opportunity presents itself, turn their weapons on their trainers and other soldiers.
Military training is highly prized and sought after by terrorists and criminals. Many terrorists travel around the world to attend terror training camps. Undoubtedly, the training our military recruits receive is a quantum leap above anything that terror training camps provide. Additionally, our soldiers learn the “playbook” employed by our military forces on the battlefield.
The thought that foreign terrorists may have successfully infiltrated our military and gained access to all of the above is highly disturbing, to put it mildly. One recruitment program, known as MAVNI (Military Accessions Vital to National Interest), has especially raised serious concerns in this context. Under this program, according to the Defense Department:
The Secretary of Defense authorized the military services to recruit certain legal aliens whose skills are considered to be vital to the national interest. Those holding critical skills – physicians, nurses, and certain experts in language with associated cultural backgrounds – would be eligible. To determine its value in enhancing military readiness, the limited pilot program will recruit up to 5,200 people in Fiscal Year 2016, and will continue through September 30, 2016.
The Fox News report on MAVNI began with this excerpt:
EXCLUSIVE: Defense Department investigators have discovered “potential security risks” in a Pentagon program that has enrolled more than 10,000 foreign-born individuals into the U.S. armed forces since 2009, Fox News has learned exclusively, with sources on Capitol Hill and at the Pentagon expressing alarm over “foreign infiltration” and enrollees now unaccounted for.
After more than a year of investigation, the Pentagon’s inspector general recently issued a report – its contents still classified but its existence disclosed here for the first time – identifying serious problems with Military Accessions Vital to the National Interest (MAVNI), a DOD program that provides immigrants and non-immigrant aliens with an expedited path to citizenship in exchange for military service.
Defense Department officials said the program is still active but acknowledged that new applications have been suspended.
First of all, it is extremely important to not forget the honorable and dedicated service of many foreign nationals who have served in our nation’s military.   Many have made the ultimate sacrifice to safeguard America and Americans, while others have suffered grievous injuries. Those are facts that we must never lose sight of.
However, I ask that you stop and take notice that none of the aliens who participated in MAVNI were illegal aliens. All of the aliens in this program -- among whom are those who have apparently gone missing and may have used this program to infiltrate the United States and gain access to military bases and military training -- were, as a requirement, legally present in the United States.
Nevertheless, even as you read this, Congress is considering the creation of a similar program for illegal aliens under the auspices of the ENLIST Act (H.R. 60) The term “ENLIST” is an acronym for: “Encourage New Legalized Immigrant to to Start Training.” This dangerous and wrong-headed program would provide illegal aliens who, in the parlance of the open borders/immigration anarchists, entered the United States “Undocumented.”
The cold, hard, irrefutable truth is that these are illegal aliens who entered the United States surreptitiously, without inspection. In other words, they are undocumented. And you cannot tell a “good guy” from a “bad guy” without a scorecard.  Undocumented aliens have no scorecards.
If there is a serious problem in vetting aliens who entered the United States with passports and visas, how in the world could our officials begin to vet aliens who evaded the inspections process conducted at ports of entry to prevent the entry of criminals, fugitives and terrorists?

Of course my question is not a really a question in search of an answer, but a rhetorical question. The answer should be self-evident.  There is no easy or effective means of vetting such aliens.
I addressed the threats that these aliens pose to national security and public safety in my recent article, When "Compassion" Endangers National Security. The lack of integrity to the vetting process for aliens who are admitted into the United States has created a deadly nightmare for America and for those who fall victim to crimes and terror attacks that these failures facilitated.
It is this lack of integrity to this vetting process that prompted President Trump to attempt to suspend the entry of aliens into the United States who are citizens of six countries associated with terrorism and whose identities and backgrounds cannot be determined with certainty. Incredibly, the Supreme Court has decided against the President’s law-based Executive Order that the media has described as a “Travel Ban,” refusing to use the actual name of that Executive Order, Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States.
That very title of that Executive Order makes its purpose crystal clear.  It is a purpose that the vast majority of American’s would undoubtedly accept and, indeed, support. Because of the de-facto censorship of “journalists”, many Americans have likely never heard the actual title of President Trump’s Executive Order. The term “Travel Ban” for citizens of “Six Muslim Majority Countries” has evoked an emotional response from many Americans who have been snookered by the media. Those six “Muslim Majority” countries have been properly identified as having an association with the threat of terrorism.
President Trump has stated that because of his concerns about the entry of potential terrorists and criminals into the United States, he has called for subjecting aliens seeking entry into the United States to “extreme vetting” when they are citizens of certain countries.
Given the unsettling findings of the Pentagon investigators -- along with many other findings in the investigations conducted by a long list of other investigative agencies -- the entire vetting process for aliens seeking visas and entry into the United States needs to be tightened dramatically.
This problem is not a new one. Back on May 20, 1997, I participated in my first Congressional hearing on the topic of Visa Fraud And Immigration Benefits Application Fraud. That hearing was conducted by the House Immigration Subcommittee and was predicated on two deadly terror attacks carried out in 1993 at the CIA Headquarters in Virginia in January of that year, followed the next month by the deadly bombing at the World Trade Center.
All of the perpetrators of those terror attacks were aliens who had, in one way or another, gamed the immigration system by securing visas through fraud, including the use of aliases and/or counterfeit and altered passports, by making false claims to political asylum or by committing fraud in applications for participation in the massive amnesty program that was an integral part of the Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA).
Many terror attacks in the years after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001 involved aliens who had entered the United States through ports of entry and then embedded themselves in communities around the United States as they went about their deadly preparations.
Today, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce is far more concerned with head counts on airliners than body counts at the morgue. Consequently, they and their allies in industry, special interest groups, government and the media, have been pushing hard to dismantle our nation’s borders, expand the Visa Waiver Program and flood America with cheap foreign labor, foreign students and foreign tourists.
That Visa Waiver Program, incidentally, should have been terminated, not expanded, after the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.
The sobering report about possible foreign malevolent infiltrators in our military must serve as a warning and a reminder that, if our leaders err, they must err on the side of caution, putting national security and public safety first.

All Fake News, All The Time: This Is CNN

DB Daily Update ^ | 8.3.2017 | David Blackmon 

Jim Acosta voids his bladder at yet another White House Press Briefing, hilarity ensues. – The Fake News Network’s petulant and preening Jim Acosta provided yet another prime example of why he and CNN should be banned from future White House press briefings yesterday. As Senior Policy Adviser Stephen Miller was discussing the details of the Raise Act, a piece of legislation that would modify the terms of legal immigration into the U.S., Acosta, without being called upon, constantly interrupted the speaker and engaged him in a debate in which he implied that the poem on the Statue of Liberty is the law of the land, and claimed that implementing a preference for English-speaking immigrants would limit legal immigration to “those from Britain and Australia.” Acosta wasn’t even fazed when Miller correctly point out that English is the main language spoken in more than 60 nations around the world, and that the poem has no legal gravitas. Naturally, Acosta appeared on CNN after the press conference and declared victory. No one else gave him that credit.
Their next study will prove Donald Trump has poopy pants. – The Center For American Progress (CAP) announced on Wednesday that it will issue a report today that proves – PROVES, I say – that the Trump Campaign “colluded” with the Russians to interfere with the U.S. election process in 2016. Fake news outlets Buzzfeed and The Hill reported on the announcement, identifying CAP only as “a progressive think tank.” What neither of those two fake outlets tell their readers is that CAP was in fact founded by… wait for it…JOHN PODESTA, the goat-sacrificing campaign manager for Hillary Clinton, and that Mr. Podesta remains active in the group’s leadership today. Fake News at its finest.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...



Your fault


One Day


Cutting it off


Little Debbie


One Good Thing!


He means business!


The Three Stooges




Democrat Party


Global Warming is Born


Just Repeal It