Friday, September 30, 2016

Was the Fix in on FBI Investigation of Hillary Clinton’s Emails?

AIM ^ | September 30, 2016 | Roger Aronoff 

The more that details about the FBI’s investigation into Hillary Clinton’s email practices come to light, the more their efforts appear to have been a sham designed to exonerate her of wrongdoing from the very beginning. As we wrote, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) failure to indict Hillary, based on the recommendation of FBI Director James Comey, has moved the United States closer to banana republic status.
The Clinton family’s ongoing corruption and Hillary Clinton’s pay-to-play as secretary of state have also created a precedent which could encourage other politicians to enrich themselves at the expense of the integrity of their office. The FBI’s light touch also has created a double standard on national security, where high-profile figures such as Mrs. Clinton walk free while others lose their security clearance or are fined or jailed.
Yet some on the left are unhappy with Comey’s investigation because of the comments he made publicly characterizing Mrs. Clinton as “extremely careless” with classified information. “What Comey should have done…was handle the Clinton probe like any other routine inquiry: provide confidential recommendations to prosecutors, release a strictly factual statement noting that the investigation would be closed, and resist external pressures to inappropriately air the FBI’s findings outside a court of law,” argues Riley Roberts, former speechwriter for former Attorney General Eric Holder, in Politico Magazine.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Why Didn't the FBI Give Hillary Clinton Immunity and Spare Us the Drama? ^ | September 30, 2016 | David Harsanyi 

Rather than striking immunity deals with virtually every person who had intimate knowledge of Hillary Clinton's illegal private server and emails, the Justice Department would have saved everyone some time by offering Clinton protection instead.
FBI Director James Comey, who testified in front of two congressional committees this week, still maintains that he was unable to recommend that the DOJ charge Clinton with mishandling classified documents because of insufficient evidence proving "intent" -- although the actions themselves are irrefutably illegal.
Well, how exactly did he anticipate gathering this proof, when the DOJ had proactively shielded the five people tasked with setting up the private system and then destroying it? Was he hoping to extract a confession directly from Clinton?
Why would, for instance, a Clinton functionary like Cheryl Mills help prosecutors once she'd already secured safeguards against any criminal prosecution? While testifying in front of the House Judiciary Committee, Comey claimed that Mills was already "cooperative" and that the Justice Department had assured the FBI she had done nothing wrong.
If she were accommodating and completely innocent, why would she seek -- and be given -- immunity? A lawyer for Mills and Heather Samuelson, another one of the five, had already admitted the deal was struck to protect her clients from potential prosecution arising from "classification" on their laptops. Apparently, the DOJ was more convinced of their innocence than their lawyer was.
In the FBI's summary statement, Mills alleged that she didn't know about Clinton's email server until after the secretary of state's tenure was over. Emails since uncovered, however, show this to be untrue. Remember also that, President Obama claimed that he first learned about Clinton's illegal server through "news reports." If that's true, why did he email Clinton on her private server under a pseudonym?
Comey admitted Wednesday that one of Clinton's lawyers -- "it might have been Cheryl Mills" -- told Paul Combetta, Clinton's IT specialist, to delete email files from Clinton's secret server only days after Congress ordered them to be preserved. And Comey assures us that none of this is obstruction of justice.
Then, at another point, he told the committee that the DOJ agreed to give immunity because the FBI didn't feel like wrangling with lawyers for years. "The FBI judgment was we need to get to that laptop. We need to see what it is," he explained. "This investigation's been going on for a year."
So I guess Mills was less than cooperative. Yes?
And why is Comey, who doesn't "give a hoot about politics," concerned about timetables, rather than making the best case? If the laptop was important enough to hasten a deal that protected a potential witness from prosecution, why wasn't it important enough for the FBI to subpoena? If Mills' lawyer is worried about potential criminality, why take a plea bargain off the table? Is this how it works for everyone?
It was rather amazing to hear Comey concede that the DOJ's immunity spree was "unusual." More unusual, perhaps, was that three of the people with those deals still ended up taking the Fifth, and another didn't even bother showing up when Congress called him. It's also unusual that a high-profile case featuring numerous immunity deals resulted in no charges.
To Comey, it was also "very unusual" that the FBI would conduct an interview with the target of an investigation -- where wholly innocent Clinton was surrounded by nine lawyers -- with two of the immunized witnesses in the case present. That's something Comey admitted had never happened in his career.
Jonathan Turley, a law professor at George Washington University, who first defended the FBI's decision not to prosecute Clinton, put the decision in historical context: "Of all of the individuals who would warrant immunity, most would view Mills as the very last on any list. If one assumes that there may have been criminal conduct, it is equivalent to immunizing H.R. Haldeman and John D. Ehrlichman in the investigation of Watergate."
Comey claimed that it was not his purview to decide who people use as their lawyers. That is true. What he failed to mention was that he determined the parameters of the interview. He could have pressured Clinton to leave Mills home, by impelling the target of the investigation to appear rather than allowing it to be voluntary interview. In a deposition about the email scandal, Mills claimed client-attorney privilege, though she was chief of staff, not Clinton's lawyer, during her tenure at the State Debarment.
Comey attempted to distance himself from the immunity deals by pointing out that he had not personally struck them. "It's a decision made by the Department of Justice, I don't know at what level inside," Comey said in the House panel. He continued, saying, "In our investigations, any kind of immunity comes from the prosecutors, not the investigators."
Surely, the DOJ doesn't offer witnesses protection from prosecution in high-profile cases without asking FBI investigators. If they did, then it would suggest a politicized process -- something this case reeks of already.


Mononymous1/Wordpress ^ | 9/30/2016 | Mononymous1 

It’d seem to me that by now, the Trump campaign ought to be pinning the “desperate” label on the Clinton campaign, specifically, as follows:
HRC is “desperate” because:
She has no vision for the future of this country that is any different from the failed and extremist policies she and her party have offered for the last 50 years and those that have been implemented over the last 7 years by the Obama administration.
She has come to the realization that you cannot fool all of the people all of the time and that the farce that has been the Obama administration will not be given a third term.
With 90+ % of the media as her puppets, she will not win and has taken to wondering why she is not 50 points ahead.
Automatically disqualified herself by mishandling classified information and finally understands that the American people, the “deplorables,” will not support and promote a lying, crooked, lawless person to the highest office in the land.
Knows that absolute power corrupts absolutely, has craved it her entire life and sees her chance for it slipping away.
The President’s and her racist and sexist appeal to divisions along race and sexist lines is simply not working.
Bought and paid for, she will not be able to deliver to her donors, foreign and domestic and the Clinton Foundation may be bankrupted as a result. She’s on notice that America and the Oval Office are not for sale.
Because the only experience she has is in setting the world on fire, deleting emails and believing that servers can be protected by the Secret Service and that they can be wiped with “a cloth.”
Her only claims to success have been in containing “bimbo eruptions,” evading indictment for various criminal activities and defending a child rapist.
Realizes that airline staff who have flown to 113 countries are better qualified than she is.
Recognizes that the American people sees the utter hypocrisy in the argument that she’s the “most qualified” to run for President which suggests that Obama must have been the least qualified and yet by her and her party’s measure, the inexperienced one has done a terrific job.
Made a mistake by prematurely declaring her imperiousness by referring to Republicans and Conservatives as enemies worse than terrorists; they’ve come to understand that they will suffer the most if she wins.

7 Times Hillary Clinton Threatened, Smeared and Targeted Women

Daily Wire ^ | September 30, 2016 | Mark Levin 

Since Monday night’s presidential debate, Donald Trump’s alleged sexism has predictably become a focal point of the Hillary Clinton campaign. The former secretary of state accused Mr. Trump of being a sexist fat-shamer whose acts have disqualified him from holding the highest office in the land. Trump, politicking horrifically, only deepened the wound by vocalizing Hillary’s claim in his and his surrogates’ subsequent interviews.
But, unlike Trump was able to point out, Hillary is no “saint girl” either. Mrs. Clinton has been accused of threatening, smearing and targeting women her husband has sexually assaulted or carried out consensual affairs with.
1. Hillary smears Gennifer Flowers; allegedly calls her “trailer-trash.”
In an ABC News interview in 1992, Hillary smears Gennifer Flowers, a women Bill would later admit to having an affair with, as “some failed cabaret singer who doesn’t even have much of a résumé to fall back on.” Hillary also reportedly referred to Flowers as “trailer trash.”
2. Hillary allegedly slams former White House intern Monica Lewinsky as a “narcissistic loony toon” after she had consensual relations with her husband in the Oval Office.
CBS News reports: "According to the friend, Diane Blair -- a political science professor whose papers were donated to the University of Arkansas Special Collections library – Hillary Clinton credited Bill Clinton with trying to break away from Lewinsky, whom she called a 'narcissistic loony toon.'"
3. Hillary, defending an alleged rapist, smears his 12-year-old alleged rape victim, claiming the young girl had a "tendency to seek out older men." She also laughs on tape over the cunning way she had vital evidence dismissed, destroying the alleged rape victim's case. 
“I have been informed that the complainant is emotionally unstable with a tendency to seek out older men and engage in fantasizing,” Hillary wrote in the affidavit about the 12-year-old alleged rape victim of her client.
Hillary is even captured on tape laughing at the fact that she got the only piece of evidence against her client dismissed: “He took a lie detector test. I had him take a polygraph, which he passed, which forever destroyed my faith in polygraphs,” Hillary says, audibly laughing.
The alleged rape victim told The Daily Beast what she would say to Hillary if she ever has the chance: "‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.'"
4. Hillary disparagingly refers to the numerous women her husband was allegedly involved with as “bimbos."
In 1991, Mrs. Clinton called the onslaught of women accusing her husband of sexual misconduct or consensual infidelity as the “bimbo eruption.”The Daily Beast what she would say to Hillary if she ever has the chance: "‘You took a case of mine in ’75, you lied on me… I realize the truth now, the heart of what you’ve done to me. And you are supposed to be for women? You call that [being] for women, what you done to me? And I hear you on tape laughing.'"
4. Hillary disparagingly refers to the numerous women her husband was allegedly involved with as “bimbos."
In 1991, Mrs. Clinton called the onslaught of women accusing her husband of sexual misconduct or consensual infidelity as the “bimbo eruption.”
5. Hillary allegedly threatens Juanita Broaddrick, Bill's alleged rape victim, into silence at a political fundraiser after the accused rape. 
According to Broaddrick, Hillary threatened her while knowing her husband had raped her:
Hillary allegedly sought out Broaddrick at the political fundraiser after Bill had raped her; she grabbed her hand and “thanked her” for “everything” she had done for Bill. Feeling frightened, Broaddrick says she tried to turn around and leave, but Hillary allegedly squeezed her hand tighter and wouldn't let her go.
Broaddrick told The Daily Wire that there was "no way" Hillary did not intend for that interaction to be construed as a threat.
“So many people have said since then that, ‘Maybe she just knew that you had been with him, maybe he hadn’t told her the complete description of what he’d done to you,’” she said. “I still feel like she knew.”
6. “I mean, I would crucify her,” Hillary says of Gennifer Flowers.
Hillary "told Esquire magazine in 1992 that if she had the chance to cross-examine Flowers, 'I mean, I would crucify her,'" notes The Washington Post. 
7. "[W]e have to destroy her story," Hillary allegedly said of one woman state troopers allegedly sought out for her husband to have a sexual encounter with. 
As noted by National Review: "When a rock groupie alleged that a state trooper approached her on Governor Clinton’s behalf, Hillary said 'we have to destroy her story.'"​

The trick is up – Forget sleight of hand Hillary

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/30/16 | Dr. Laurie Roth 

Vote for America, yourself and freedom – Vote Trump and make Hillary pay for her greed, lies, crimes and failure in leadership…by voting her out
This is war and is the worldview clash of the century with Clinton and Trump.

Never forget this as you peer through the magic looking glass for debate 2 and 3 and see the smooth and lipstick laden Hillary doing what she does in her magic show. She distracts, she plays pretend with ‘fact checks’ attacking Trump with disjointed assaults that don’t exist in any real and fair context. She lies, cheats and steals as she arrogantly smiles away with bright red lipstick smeared on her teeth.

She is no ‘first woman’ anything but rather the last woman on earth any one of us should want in the White House running anything.

Never forget that Hillary is a political side show magician. She will always lie, maneuver with hopes people aren’t looking and deceive. Her long time and only agenda ever in her fraudulent career has been to gain and keep money and power – the end.

Obama administration may use obscure fund to pay billions to ACA insurers

Washington Post ^ | Sept 29, 2016 | Amy Goldstein 

The Obama administration is maneuvering to pay health insurers billions of dollars the government owes under the Affordable Care Act, through a move that could circumvent Congress and help shore up the president’s signature legislative achievement before he leaves office.

Justice Department officials have privately told several health plans suing over the unpaid money that they are eager to negotiate a broad settlement, which could end up offering payments to about 175 health plans selling coverage on ACA marketplaces, according to insurance executives and lawyers familiar with the talks.

The payments most likely would draw from an obscure Treasury Department fund intended to cover federal legal claims, the executives and lawyers said. This approach would get around a recent congressional ban on the use of Health and Human Services money to pay the insurers.
...A settlement probably would rely on Treasury’s Judgment Fund, a 1950s creation that is allowed as much money as it needs to satisfy valid claims against the government.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Despite economic gains, small businesses say, "What recovery?" ^ | September 29, 2016 | Ed Leefeldt 

Many small-business owners and academics aren’t buying into President Obama’s claim that the 5.2 percent rise in household income last year translates into an economic rebound. Truth be told, it could be the opposite.
On Sept. 13, the U.S. Census Bureau reported that median household income jumped $2,800 -- slightly more than 5 percent in 2015. While speaking at a rally in Philadelphia for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, President Obama called it a “big deal ... the single biggest one-year increase on record.”
But many Americans see it as a case of “been down so long it looks like up to me.” While household income may have gone up in 2015, “over the last decade there not only has been no growth ... it actually decreased slightly,” said the SBE. This compares unfavorably with the average 1.4 percent annual rise over the last 60 years.
One reason more people don’t feel wealthier is that the current gain has been “muted by sector-oriented inflation and taxes,” said Craig Lemoine, a professor of financial planning at the American College of Financial Services. “Families are now required to carry health insurance,” he pointed out, “and those premiums have been increasing.”
And then there are those who haven’t benefited at all. The census data shows that 43 million Americans remain in poverty.

Trump camp returns fire, targets Clintons’ treatment of women (victims speak-out!)

F O X News ^ | 09-30-16 

Donald Trump’s campaign is signaling that Bill Clinton’s history of affairs and alleged sexual misconduct – as well as Hillary Clinton’s treatment of the women involved – is now fair game, after his Democratic opponent took the first shot by calling out his own negative comments toward women at Monday’s debate.

The Republican nominee took a direct swipe at the former president during a New Hampshire rally on Thursday, in a sign of jabs to come.
"The American people have had it with years and decades of Clinton corruption and scandal," Trump said. "And impeachment for lying. … Remember that?"
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

He fought in World War II. He died in 2014. And he just registered to vote in Va.

MSN Washington Post ^ | September 29, 2016 

The FBI and local police are investigating how at least 19 dead Virginians were recently re-registered to vote in this critical swing state. One case came to light after relatives of a deceased man received a note congratulating him for registering, Rockingham County Commonwealth’s Attorney Marsha Garst said Thursday. “His family members were very distraught,” said Garst, who confirmed the existence of the FBI and police investigation but said she could provide few details because the case is ongoing.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

U.S. Signed Secret Document to Lift U.N. Sanctions on Iranian Banks [same day Tehran released..]

Wall Street Journal ^ 

U.S. Signed Secret Document to Lift U.N. Sanctions on Iranian Banks
Administration backed measures on the same day Tehran released four American citizens from prison

By Jay Solomon and Carol E. Lee Sept. 29, 2016 8:02 p.m. ET

WASHINGTON—The Obama administration agreed to back the lifting of United Nations sanctions on two Iranian state banks blacklisted for financing Iran’s ballistic-missile program on the same day in January that Tehran released four American citizens from prison, according to U.S. officials and congressional staff briefed on the deliberations.
The U.N. sanctions on the two banks weren’t initially to be lifted until 2023, under a landmark nuclear agreement between Iran and world powers that went into effect on Jan. 16.
The U.N. Security Council’s delisting of the two banks, Bank Sepah and Bank Sepah International, was part of a package of tightly scripted agreements—the others were a controversial prisoner swap and transfer of $1.7 billion in cash to Iran—that were finalized between the U.S. and Iran on Jan. 17, the day the Americans were freed.
The new details of the delisting have emerged after administration officials briefed lawmakers earlier this month on the U.S. decision.
According to senior U.S. officials, a senior State Department official, Brett McGurk, and a representative of the Iranian government signed three documents in Geneva on the morning of Jan. 17.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

WOW: Trump Camp SHATTERS Fund raising Records Less Than 24 Hours After Debate

Conservative Tribune ^ | 09/28/16 

Americans must believe in Donald Trump, because just after the first presidential debate, Trump raised millions of dollars for his campaign.
According to The HillTrump’s campaign raised $18 million in less than 24 hours after that debate.

“As a result of Donald Trump’s huge debate win last night, we had a massive fundraising day, bringing in more than $18 million,” Trump finance chairman Steven Mnuchin said in a statement.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Black Lives Matter Leader: ‘We Will INCITE RIOTS Everywhere If Trump Wins’

US Chronicle ^ | 9/29/16 | Unknown 

Though the outcome of America’s presidential election is still up in the air, Black Lives Matter has made it clear that one outcome is certain. If Donald Trump is the victor, violence will erupt in the streets. This according to rapper and activist Tef Poe when he took to Twitter to say,

“Dear white people if Trump wins young niggers such as myself are fully hell bent on inciting riots everywhere we go. Just so you know.”

If you are unsure who ‘Tef Poe’ is, don’t worry, you are not alone. All you really need to know about him is that he is the co-founder of the Hands Up United organization out of Ferguson, Missouri. His organization chose its name based off of the false narrative that Michael Brown, a teenage thug, had his hands up and back turned to officer Darren Wilson when he was shot.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

The real reason why Trump won the debate

The Washington Times ^ | September 28, 2016 | Monica Crowley 

Four years ago, you could have almost seen Bill Clinton’s thought bubble as he watched Barack Obama’s weak and listless performance against Mitt Romney during the first presidential debate: “I can’t believe we lost to this guy.”
Mr. Clinton never would have mailed it in the way Mr. Obama did. He may have lost some of his old magic, but he’s still got the golden touch.
His wife, however, never had it — and clearly never will, as evidenced by her plodding and grating debate performance against Donald Trump this week. At the same time, Mr. Trump was aggressive, projecting authority even when he was on relatively shaky ground. Unlike others who have opposed her, he didn’t care that she was a Clinton or a Democrat or a woman. He didn’t defer to her, offer special treatment or allow her a wide berth for Clintonian parsing.
Relishing his outsider role, he positioned her squarely in her role of status quo incumbent. By doing so and by clearing the bar of appearing a reasonable man and plausible president, he lived to fight another day.
Because he’s never done this before, voters give him a lot more running room to make mistakes and find his bearings. The fact that he more than held his own on the biggest political stage on earth is astounding. The traditional metrics don’t apply to this candidate or this election year, which is why he was able to walk away not just intact but perhaps stronger....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Trump: Hillary Clinton Wants Power for One Reason, ‘To Protect Her Donors and Take Their Money’

Breitbart ^ | 29 Sep 2016 | MICHAEL PATRICK LEAHY 

Donald Trump addressed a packed house at a rally in Bedford, New Hampshire Thursday afternoon where he blasted Hillary Clinton, whom he said is “there for only one reason: to protect her donors and take their money.”
“Hillary Clinton is an insider fighting only for herself and her donors. I’m an outsider fighting for you,” Trump said, contrasting himself with his rival for the presidency.
“Follow the money,” he continued, hitting on a theme that has been central to his criticism of Clinton.
“The large corporations who support terrible trade deals… they’re donating to Hillary Clinton. It’s called follow the money,” Trump continued.
“The special interests who want open borders are donating to Hillary Clinton. Just follow the money,” he added.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Silent White Professionals Will Rally for Trump at Polls!

NewsMax ^ | September 29, 2016 

College-educated whites who've been quiet in their support for Donald Trump will emerge in droves to vote for the Republican presidential candidate on Election Day, veteran political analyst Dick Morris, a former adviser to President Bill Clinton, tells Newsmax TV.

"People who do not normally vote — high school-educated whites largely — and normally stay out of the process are now thronging into the electorate to vote for Trump," Morris, author of "Armageddon: How Trump Can Beat Hillary," said Thursday to J.D. Hayworth on "America Talks Live."

"To give you a feel of how extensive this could be, if you take the final days polling in every one of the primaries and you compare the vote share they predicted Donald would get with the vote share he actually got on the primary itself, it's a 5-point difference....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

U.S.: Wells Fargo illegally repossessed 413 armed service members' cars! ^ | September 29, 2016 | Jackie Wattles 

Wells Fargo will pay $24 million to settle allegations that it mistreated members of the military -- including illegally repossessing their cars.
The bank, already reeling from a scandal over fake accounts, will pay $4.1 million to settle Justice Department charges that it seized 413 cars owned by service members without a court order, a violation of federal law.
The Justice Department said the illegal repossessions took place from 2008 to 2015. The first complaint came from an Army National Guardsman in North Carolina who said the bank seized his car while he was preparing to deploy to Afghanistan.
Wells Fargo then auctioned his car and tried to collect a balance of $10,000 from his family, the Justice Department said.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Hillary Clinton Demands The US Build A Wall At The Mexican Border!

Common Sense Evaluation ^ 

Here is a video of Hillary Clinton saying the United States needs to secure their border and put a wall of to keep all the people from Mexico from coming over and deport those that are already here:

(Excerpt) Read more at here!

NON-CITIZEN MUSLIM MALL TERRORIST ILLEGALLY VOTED 3 TIMES! ^ | September 30, 2016 | Daniel Greenfield 

But remember, Voter ID is racist. It discriminates against illegal voters.
But first a step back. We're talking about the Turkish Muslim mall terrorist in Washington, not the Somali Muslim mall shooter in Minnesota. We're getting so much Muslim terror these days that it takes work to keep it all straight.
The Cascade Mall shooting suspect, Arcan Cetin, may face an additional investigation related to his voting record and citizenship status.
Federal sources confirm to KING 5 that Cetin was not a U.S. citizen, meaning legally he cannot vote. However, state records show Cetin registered to vote in 2014 and participated in three election cycles, including the May presidential primary.
Just the sort of fellow we want deciding the next president.
While voters must attest to citizenship upon registering online or registering to vote at the Department of Licensing Office, Washington state doesn't require proof of citizenship. Therefore elections officials say the state's elections system operates, more or less, under an honor system.
An honor system. Of course. Actually verifying citizenship would be discriminatory. It would, in Obama's words, not be who we are. And who we are, apparently, is a bunch of suckers who let Muslim terrorists illegally vote.
"We don’t have a provision in state law that allows us either county elections officials or the Secretary of State's office to verify someone’s citizenship," explained Secretary of State Kim Wyman. "So, we’re in this place where we want to make sure we’re maintaining people’s confidence in the elections and the integrity of the process, but also that we’re giving this individual, like we would any voter, his due process."
Actual due process would involve verifying the right to vote. But that would be bad for Democrats.



The Idea


Ghetto Bosses


De Liar


Our Greeter!






Double Team


F.A.C.T. Checker




What matters


Veto Override




Lipstick on a pig!


Wet Dreamers


The Plug!




Thursday, September 29, 2016

New Scandal: Hillary Caught Paying Off FBI Director? ^ | 9/28/16 | Adam Cambell 

It has come out that James Comey accepted positions and financial compensation for working as a general counsel for Lockheed Martin.
Comey worked for Lockheed and in one year, the first year Lockheed would become a major Clinton Foundation donor, Comey was paid $6 million in 2010.
The same year, Lockheed Martin won 17 private contracts from the State Department. Guess who ran the State Department in 2010? Hillary Clinton.
Lockheed Martin also joined the American Chamber of Commerce in Egypt and the group paid Bill Clinton $250,000 for a speech in the year, 2010.
To take it a step further, James allegedly made sure his brother got in the loop too.
Peter Comey, the brother of the FBI director works as Senior Director of Real Estate Operations for the Americas for a company named DLA Piper.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

For Your Friends Who Say It's Hillary's "Turn"

blueunicorn6 | 9/29/2016 | blueunicorn6 

We all know people who think that it's Hillary's "turn" to be President.
Usually, the concept of "turns" is found with children.

"It's Megyn's turn to be the goose!"
"It's Sheperd's turn to use the potty. We don't want another accident!"
Adults generally try to select the person for President who will squeeze the most efficiency and effectiveness out of every hard-earned American Taxpayer provided dollar.
But, for our friends who worry about "turns"......
It's official!
I, blueunicorn6, the acknowledged Universal Grandmaster of the One Potato - Two Potato Game, conducted an official game of One Potato - Two potato today between Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump and
There's no "do-overs" or crossing fingers behind backs.
It is officially, without a doubt, Donald Trump's turn to be President of The United States!
To be fair, I played another game of One Potato - Two Potato with Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama.
It is officially Hillary's turn to be first for Show And Tell.
She is going to show us her secret Internet server and explain how taking bribes from foreign governments work.
For your friends and neighbors who actually have brains and don't make decisions in a childish manner, point out that Donald Trump will squeeze the most efficiency and effectiveness out of every hard-earned American Taxpayer dollar.
Hey! There's no arguing with One Potato -Two Potato!

Yup, now the iPhone 7 is exploding

Boy Genius Report ^ | Sep 29, 2016 | Zach Epstein 

The world’s leading smartphone makers just can’t stop copying each other. While the company has certainly improved its image over the past few years, Samsung is likely most famous for being an Apple copycat. After all, the company was sued repeatedly by Apple for stealing its technology and designs. And as we all learned, things got so crazy at one point that Samsung even created a 132-page internal document to help its engineers copy the iPhone pixel by pixel. Of course, Apple is hardly innocent in all this. The iPhone maker has aped plenty of features from Android in recent years, and it probably never would have made iPhones with large displays if Samsung hadn’t paved the way.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Scandalous Behavior (Judicial Watch Panel On Clinton Corruption)

Judicial Watch ^ | Gerard Perry 

While the scrupulously impartial moderator of Monday’s presidential debate didn’t see fit to ask a single question about one candidate’s wanton disregard for the law, though she herself alluded to it obliquely, Judicial Watch is not in the habit of playing favorites. Criminality is criminality, even when the Director of the FBI refuses to deem it so.
That’s why it is holding a special presentation exploring both emailgate and the elaborate money laundering scheme known as the Clinton Foundation tomorrow afternoon. You’ll find all of the details about tomorrow’s event in their press release, and can watch the proceedings live. Perhaps you’ll do Lester Holt a favor and send him that link, just to refresh his memory for any future debates he might oversee.

ObamaCare, HillaryCare . . .they don't care!

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/29/16 | Herman Cain 

It's awful for you, but they're getting what they've been after all along.

Many voters don’t remember the failed predecessor of ObamaCare. It was called HillaryCare in the early 1990s. Hillary Clinton was an unelected, non-official put in charge of a commission to design a plan to hijack the U.S. health care system.

It failed when the public found out what was in it and pressured the Senate to abandon it, which they did.

In 2009, President Obama, then-Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid and then-Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi shoved ObamaCare down the throats of the American people.

They did it by lying to the American people about insurance premiums going down, and lying about people being able to keep their preferred doctors and health insurance providers.

Media lies can’t make a bad night for the newsroom’s goddess go away!

The Coach's Team ^ | 9/29/16 | Kevin "Coach" Collins 

To say the media is shell shocked at the results of the first debate would be a gross understatement. The media is clearly panicked and in a frenzy, not only by Hillary Clinton’s lackluster performance, but by the results of more than a dozen “Who won?” snap-polls conducted immediately after the last softball pitched to Hillary Clinton by the partisan hack masquerading as a moderator.

On Monday night The Charlotte Observer put together a focus group of 21 reportedly undecided potential voters from the Charlotte, North Carolina area which is a longtime Democrat stronghold. They had the group watch the debate and report their feelings and observations to the paper’s political reporters. By definition this means a group of largely liberal voters talked to two liberal reporters representing a liberal McClatchy news outlet.

The piece begins with a lie, “Indeed, while polls found that Clinton had won the first general-election debate with Donald Trump on Monday, she may not have won actual votes…”
There was not a single credible poll showing that Hillary Clinton came close to winning the tag team match where she and her partner, Moderator Lester Holt, attacked Trump throughout the evening.
A quick compilation of 14 of these online polls showed that Trump won each one except the laughable CNN (Clinton News Network) poll by an average of 71%/29%.
These fake reporters know that if someone is reading their article there is a good likelihood that he/she is not computer savvy and would not know how to vote in one of these polls even if they knew the poll existed.
The only place Clinton won was in the newsrooms where lies like this are...
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Ruth Ginsburg Threatens To “Resign From SCOTUS” If Trump Is Elected President! (yea!)

NOS Communications ^ 

The Supreme Court is in recess for the summer, but Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg took some time to reflect on its future composition, which will chiefly depend on who is elected president in November. Asked on Thursday about the prospect of Donald Trump being handed the job of selecting the next crop of justices, she seemed uneasy at the thought.
“I don’t want to think about that possibility, but if it should be, then everything is up for grabs,” she told The Associated Press in a wide-ranging interview that also touched on the loss of her dear friend Antonin Scalia and some of the court’s biggest rulings in the term that ended in late June.
“I really dislike that man for a number of reasons, and although I am not supposed to put forth my personal views because of my position, I still feel obligated to do whatever I can in order to let the public know that there’s still time to make the right choice,” she added.
“Donald Trump is a man who has accumulated his vast wealth not because of his business prowess, but because of the fact that much of it was inherited from his father and grandfather. In fact, when it comes to making important decisions, I don’t recall him ever making the right one, and that’s not the type of man that should be at the head of this country.” After opening fire at the presumptive Republican presidential candidate, Ginsberg turned to her own plans should Donald Trump actually become the new President of the United States.
“There’s no need to beat around the bush, so I’m just going to go ahead and say it – I will resign my position as a Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States if that happens. I cannot imagine performing my duties under the constant pressure of waking up in the morning and having to go to work knowing that every ruling we as an institution make will be viewed through the prism of a Trump presidency. I can tolerate this charade of a presidential campaign, but I could not live with him as president,” she said.
“I am a woman who has lived long enough, and I am proud to say I’ve had a prosperous and fulfilled life,” Justice Ginsberg argued.
However, I am too old and too far gone to be forced to put up with the idiotic and surreal presidency of a man who up until yesterday cared for no one else but his own deep pocket. I fear that kind of situation would go against the very principles that are the building blocks of the Constitution of the United States. I see no purpose in continuing to perform my professional duties when I’m aware that everything I say and do will most likely be shot down by a man so ignorant he probably requires GPS just to find his belly button while taking a shower

NBC Donated $5.6 Million To Democratic Party, Provided First Debate’s Moderator ^ | 28 Sep 2016 

NBC parent company Comcast donated $5.6 million to the Democratic Party during its convention in Philadelphia, and NBC provided Monday night’s presidential debate moderator.

The Democratic Party released a comprehensive list of donors right before the momentous debate, according to The Intercept.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Believe It!


Racial Expert




Not Good!


The Debate


Stronger Together


Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Juanita Broaddrick to Chelsea Clinton: ‘Your parents are not good people’

The Washington Times ^ | September 28, 2016 | Jessica Chasmar 

Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who famously accused former President Bill Clinton of raping her during his 1978 gubernatorial campaign in Arkansas, took to Twitter Wednesday to address Chelsea Clinton’s downplaying of her father’s sexual misconduct.
“Here is my response to Chelsea Clinton’s statement about her father’s sexual misdeeds,” wroteMs. Broaddrick, a Donald Trump supporter who stepped back into the national spotlight recently after years of silence about the alleged rape.
“Chelsea you said you don’t remember a time in your life that your parents weren’t being attacked. There’s a very good reason for this — your parents are not good people,” she wrote in a series of tweets...
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Madness Swirls At House Judiciary Committee As Comey Attempts To Justify Hillary Innocence

zero hedge ^ | 9/28/16 | tyler durden 

Comey on Clinton email probe: ‘Don’t call us weasels’ … The normally-stoic FBI chief grew emotional as he rejected claims that the FBI was in the tank for Clinton.
James Comey appeared today before the House Judiciary Committee to answer questions about the FBI’s decision not to recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton regarding misuse of classified emails – and in the process told members that once the politics stopped circulating, the FBI would again be seen as the institution “you know and love.”
This hyperbolic statement certainly set the tone for the larger hearing which saw Comey testifying with unusual emotionalism, adding at one point that people ought not to see those involved in the decision as “weasels.”
“You can call us wrong, but don’t call us weasels. We are not weasels,” he said. “We are honest people and….whether or not you agree with the result, this was done the way you want it to be done.”
Despite Hillary’s destruction of various phones with hammers (to mention only one issue), he spent several hours insisting, often querulously, that there was no evidence that she intended to obstruct justice or to hide evidence. His statements were mostly a repetition of already presented justifications. As they made little sense previously, they added neither clarity nor insight.
Republican congressmen – many of whom were increasingly incredulous – pressed him in startling ways. Several virtually demanded he reopen the case and others told him bluntly that “you blew it.”
“I would be in big trouble and I should be in big trouble if I did something like that,” said Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.). “There seems to be different strokes for different folks. I think there’s a heavy hand coming from someplace else.”
Comey was confronted with new evidence
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Corrupt Lester Holt shows why Americans are sick of media

American Thinker ^ | September 28, 2016 | M. Catharine Evans 

Lester Holt's blatant bias against Donald Trump Monday night held to Hunter S. Thompson's brutal description of journalists and journalism:
Journalism is not a profession or a trade; it is a cheap catch-all for f---offs and misfits – a false doorway to the backside of life.
Holt just proved to tens of millions of Americans that absolute media power corrupts absolutely. If trust and confidence in the media have fallen to the lowest in history, as recently reported, Holt, in his total abandonment of any semblance of objectivity, has lowered both even more.
This bootlicking cog, beholden to his pro-Hillary media masters, didn't bring up Benghazi, the email scandals, the Clinton Foundation slush fund, Huma Abedin's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, or Clinton's connections to the biggest female oppressors on the planet. With no pushback at all, Holt allowed Hillary to reference an irrelevant 1996 beauty pageant winner as an example of Trump's so-called misogyny.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Eight Years Later, Obama Has Learned Nothing About the Israeli-Palestinian Dispute

Algemeiner ^ | 9-26-16 | Mitchell Bard 

President Obama’s failure to learn anything in the last eight years about the Palestinian-Israeli dispute was evident in his final speech to the UN General Assembly. In the mere 31 words that he devoted to the subject, he laid bare his ignorance: “Israelis and Palestinians will be better off if Palestinians reject incitement and recognize the legitimacy of Israel,” he said. “But Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land.”
Sounds reasonable enough, doesn’t it? Both sides have responsibility for the conflict — except they don’t.
First, the Palestinian side of the equation was severely understated. Yes, the Palestinians must reject incitement, but they must also actively prevent terrorism. They must stop using US and EU taxpayer money to pay terrorists and their families. Yasser Arafat said he recognized Israel, but it has been clear since that 1993 letter to Yitzhak Rabin that the Palestinians do not accept the legitimacy of Israel as the national home of the Jewish people.
Furthermore, the Palestinians are unwilling to make any territorial compromises that would lead to a two-state solution. They continue to show support for the strategy whereby they would accept a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza only as a first stage in the eventual liberation of all of “Palestine” — a goal reflected in Palestinian media, maps, crossword puzzles, textbooks, Fatah insignias, and every other venue one can name.
Worse, the possibility of a political solution to the conflict has been eliminated not by Israeli actions, but by the ascendancy of radical Islam — best represented by Hamas — in Palestinian society. The Islamists, who have co-opted the “secular” Palestinian leadership, will never accept the existence of a Jewish state in what they consider the Muslim heartland, nor will they tolerate a situation whereby Jews “rule” over Muslims.
Obama still fails to see these truths. In fact, he reinforces the Palestinians’ bad behavior by continuing to make excuses for them and holding Mahmoud Abbas out as a partner for peace even though the Palestinian “president” has rejected Obama’s calls for negotiations for nearly eight years. In fact, there is no better example of how weak the US has become under Obama than the fact that a pipsqueak like Abbas, who is totally dependent on international aid for his survival, has repeatedly defied Obama by refusing to negotiate and going around the president and the Israelis to the UN in search of international sanctions to impose Palestinian terms on Israel.
President Obama also continues to make the sophistic comparison between Palestinian terrorism and Jewish settlements. He seriously believes that Jews establishing homes on land that has been part of Jewish history for thousands of years is equivalent to Palestinians murdering Jews. Even as rockets are falling on Israel, bombs are exploding, and people are being shot, stabbed, and run over, Obama finds fault only with Israel.
In fact, with all the violence in the Middle East, and now in the United States, it is mind-boggling that the White House and State Department remain obsessed with publicly chastising Israel over its housing policies.
Public opinion on the further development of West Bank communities is very controversial in Israel; however, in the absence of any Palestinian peace initiative, opponents have little ground to stand on. Left-wing critics in the US and Israel whine about the failure of the political system to produce a government that supports their minority views, ignoring the reality that the failure of prior peace efforts are responsible for the shift of Israeli voters to the right.
More than 20 years have passed since the Oslo agreement raised hopes for an end to the conflict. Yet Palestinian violence never ceased and the territorial compromises Israel made did not lead to pace. When Israel completely withdrew settlers and soldiers from Gaza and gave the Palestinians an opportunity to start to build the infrastructure of a state, they demonstrated the Israeli right was correct in predicting that the Palestinians would pocket any concessions, seek more without any reciprocity, and escalate terror. If the “occupation” ended tomorrow, the conflict would continue and Israelis would be in more serious danger because the terrorists would be unencumbered, and have the capability to threaten Israel’s airports, population centers, industrial heartland, and capital.
A case can be made against the expansion of settlements; for example, that it hurts Israel’s position internationally; that it diverts military resources away from more critical threats; that it is costly at a time when money might be better spent on domestic needs; that it makes a political solution — with the big caveat that the Palestinians must someday want one — more difficult; and that it puts Israel in a conundrum whereby it will be increasingly difficult to remain a Jewish and democratic state as the proportion of the Palestinian population becomes a significant minority, if not the majority, between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River.
Still, history cannot be ignored. No settlements existed prior to 1967 and there was no peace. The Palestinians were unwilling to make peace even when settlers numbered in the thousands. They were unwilling to stop the violence when Israel evacuated Gaza. Today, with a settler population of 350,000, the Palestinians can denounce Israel all they want, but they have only themselves to blame. Their chance for statehood will continue to dissipate the longer they refuse to negotiate and compromise. Today, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to relocate 50,000 or more Jews from outlying settlements if Palestinians agreed to a two-state solution. When the number of settlers grows, as expected, to 500,000 over the next several years, territorial compromise will probably be impossible.
There’s little hope for Obama to figure this out in his last months, and we can only hope he does not make the situation worse — as he has in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. It would be wiser for him to focus on those debacles and the continued rise of radical Islam. I’m not terribly optimistic given the candidates, but at least there is hope that the next president will have a better grasp of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and not repeat the mistakes of the last eight years.

Chelsea Clinton: Father’s infidelity talk just 'a distraction’!

Politico ^ | 9/27/2016 | Cristiano Lima 

Chelsea Clinton is in no rush to thank Donald Trump for not mentioning Bill Clinton’s infidelity during Monday night’s presidential debate.
The daughter of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton pushed back against Trump’s claim that he was proud to not have resurfaced the former president’s past out of “respect” for her in an interview with Cosmopolitan on Tuesday, saying the Republican candidate is only seeking to sidestep real issues.
“It’s a distraction from his inability to talk about what’s actually at stake in this election and to offer concrete, comprehensive proposals about the economy, or our public school system, or debt-free college, or keeping our country safe and Americans safe here at home and around the world,” she said.
Chelsea, a friend of Trump’s daughter Ivanka, went on to attack Trump for his repeated attacks against women and minority groups, saying those are “far more troubling than whatever his most recent screed against my mom or my family [is].”
"What I find most troubling by far," she said, “are Trump’s continued, relentless attacks on whole swaths of our country and even our global community: women, Muslims, Americans with disabilities, [and] a Gold Star family.”
Read more: Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Failed To Take Highest Security Training At State Dept In 2009!

Daily Caller ^ | September 27, 2016 | RICHARD POLLOCK 

Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton failed to complete the highest level of security training mandated by the Department of State for the proper handling of the government’s most secret documents when she entered the department in 2009, according to documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation under the Freedom of Information Act.

The State Department released 46 pages of previously unseen documents Tuesday under a Sept. 20, 2016, order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Fact-Checking Lester Holt

WSJ Editorial
We told you Tuesday that Donald Trump was right when he pushed back on debate moderator Lester Holt over “stop and frisk” policing. But the story deserves a more complete explanation, not least because the media are distorting the record.
Mr. Trump invoked stop and frisk as a way to “take the gun away from criminals” in high-crime areas and protect the innocent. That provoked Mr. Holt, who said that “stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York.” Mr. Trump then noted that the ruling in the case came from a “very against police judge” who later had the case taken away from her. Mrs. Clinton then echoed Mr. Holt.
Here’s what really happened. The federal judge in the stop-and-frisk case was Shira Scheindlin, a notorious police critic whose behavior got her taken off the case by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court put it this way:
“Upon review of the record in these cases, we conclude that the District Judge ran afoul of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges . . . and that the appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation was compromised by the District Judge’s improper application of the Court’s ‘related case rule’ . . . and by a series of media interviews and public statements purporting to respond publicly to criticism of the District Court.”
The court then remanded the case to another judge who would not present an appearance of bias against the police. In a follow-up opinion, the appellate judges cited a New Yorker interview with Judge Scheindlin that included a quote from a former law clerk saying “what you have to remember about the judge is that she thinks cops lie.”
This is an extraordinary rebuke by a higher court and raises doubts that the merits of her ruling would have held up on appeal. As Rudolph Giuliani makes clear nearby, the judge’s ruling of unconstitutionality applied only to stop and frisk as it was practiced in New York at the time. Such police search tactics have long been upheld by higher courts.
In the end, the clock ran out on Mayor Mike Bloomberg, and new Mayor Bill de Blasio chose not to appeal. We rate Mr. Trump’s claim true and unfairly second-guessed by a moderator who didn’t give the viewing public all the facts.

Two thirds of voters say they think Hillary is secretly in poor health!

Daily Mail UK ^ | September 27, 2016 | Chris Summers 

Two thirds of voters say they think Hillary is secretly in poor health despite her efforts to shrug off pneumonia concerns
AP-GfK poll found 51 per cent of voters have confidence in Trump's health But only 36 per cent feel Hillary Clinton is well enough to be president She collapsed at a 9/11 memorial service and spent several days at home Her doctor later said she had pneumonia, raising fears about her health At the first presidential debate she pointed out she had visited 112 nations On Tuesday she was seen coughing while speaking to press on her plane Two-thirds of American voters are worried about Hillary Clinton's health and agree with Donald Trump's suggestions that she has a lack of 'stamina,' a new poll suggests.
An Associated Press-GfK poll found that voters, especially men, have more confidence in Trump's health than Clinton's.
The result comes despite the Clinton campaign's attempts to calm the public fears that increased after she was diagnosed with pneumonia and had a public collapse on Sept. 11.
She has released about the same amount of medical information as Trump, and independent doctors who have looked at the available data say both candidates seem fine. But Wednesday's survey shows evidence of the political points Trump scored after her much-publicized pneumonia, which caused her to drop out of the campaign for several days after her collapse at a 9/11 memorial service in New York.
The AP-GfK poll found 51 per cent of voters were very or extremely confident that the 70-year-old Trump is healthy enough to be president.
But only 36 per cent had the same confidence in the health of Hillary, who turns 69 a few days before the November 8 election.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Obama ‘Conducting Conversations’ to Send More Money to Iran!

Breitbart ^ | September 27, 2016 | Edwin Mora 

The president of Iran, state-sponsor of terrorism, has said he is expecting more money from the United States in addition to the $1.7 billion in cash that President Barack Obama has already paid the Shiite Islamic Republic as part of his nuclear deal.

“There are still considerable sums of money in the United States that belong to our nation. And we’re currently conducting conversations and various dialogues in order to return this money to Iran. Some things that we could not agree upon, there are ways to address those in the international court system,” Shiite Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani told NBC News’s Chuck Todd in an exclusive interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Charlotte negro rioters don’t care if shooting was justified!

The National Post ^ | September 26, 2016 | Rich Lowry 

The Charlotte negro rioters didn’t know whether the controversial police shooting of Keith Scott was justified, and didn’t care.

They worked their mayhem — trashing businesses and injuring cops, with one protester killed in the disorder — before anything meaningful could be ascertained about the case except that the cops said Scott had a gun and his family said he didn’t.

Charlotte is the latest episode in the evidence-free Black Lives Matter movement that periodically erupts in violence after officer-involved shootings. The movement is beholden to a narrative of systematic police racism to which every case is made to conform, regardless of the facts or logic.

It doesn’t matter if the police officer is an African-American with an unblemished record and numerous character witnesses. This describes Brentley Vinson, the officer who fatally shot Keith Scott....

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Still Report #1218 - UPI Poll - Trump Takes Leads in Electoral College (333 Trump-205 Clinton)

Still Report ^ | 9/27/2016 | Bill Still 

For the first time this year, a major polling operation now says that Donald Trump has overtaken Hillary Clinton in the only race that matters – the Electoral College race.
The poll was conducted between Sept. 12 and 25th. It tracks 250 likely voters in each state every week. Results are tabulated every two weeks. Although the UPI’s national poll shows Clinton with a slight lead of 2/3rds of one percent, Trump tromps the ailing former Secretary of State by an Electoral College margin of 292 to 246 with 270 needed for victory. What’s changed? Trump is now leading in Florida by 1.8%, Iowa by 2%, North Carolina by 2.5%, and Ohio by 1%. But the two new surprises into the Trump camp are Pennsylvania where Trump now leads by 1.3% and Virginia where Trump leads by a whopping 3.4% margin.
Among the swing states, Clinton is ahead in Colorado (3.5%), Michigan (4.4%), Minnesota (4%), Nevada (0.5%), New Hampshire (0.9%) and Wisconsin (3.4%)...
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Media Bias is Alive and Well at the Presidential Debate

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/27/16 | Chip McLean 

Perhaps Donald Trump should coin a phrase, “doing the jobs that the American press won’t do.”

The first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has come and gone. So who won?

That’s a harder question to answer than “who lost?”

The loser in this case was journalistic integrity.

The “performance” by so-called moderator Lester Holt could be likened to that of the interfering third party in a pro wrestling event. Anytime Trump was pounding away on Hillary, Lester Holt was there to jump in the ring and hit Trump over the head with a metaphorical chair or other foreign object. Vince McMahon couldn’t have scripted a better two on one match – especially as this added the plot-twister of the referee being the one who interfered.

Earth to Democrats/media: All smart people try to minimize their tax liability

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/27/16 | Dan Calabrese 

Preferably to zero. You’re a fool if you don’t.

One of the reasons I hate politics is that political people exist in a world completely divorced from the reality in which normal people live. In the fantasy world of political people, the most wonderful and high-minded thing you can do is fork over an enormous chunk of your wealth to the federal government, because this is how you keep everyone else living, breathing, fat and happy.

And in this fantasy world, anyone who would not want to do this is a greedy pig, beneath contempt and unworthy of a place in polite society.

Voting For Hillary Clinton Equals Accelerating Muslim Killings Of Americans

US Defense Watch ^ | September 27, 2016 | Frosty Wooldridge 

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” Omar Ahmed, director of Council on American Islamic Relations.
By reading that statement by one of the BIG Muslim leaders for CAIR in America, you face an uneasy feeling he means business. And, as his Muslim immigrant friends grow in number, he enjoys greater power to institute his intentions onto the American people.
Islam Is All About Power Through Numbers
One of those American citizens, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton promises to import 110,000 Syrian refugees as soon as she reaches the White House. If the American people vote her into office, you can expect Muslim violence to escalate with the added numbers of refugees. Example: look at Europe’s bombings, violence, rapes and riots from Muslim immigrants.
On Saturday, September 24, 2016, in a Washington State mall, Turkish immigrant Arcan Cetin stabbed 10 and gunned down 5 people in yet another Muslim terrorist attack on American citizens.
Last week, September 20, 2016, in St. Cloud, Minnesota, a 20-year-old Muslim immigrant, Dahir Ahmed Adan, stabbed ten Americans in a shopping mall before being shot dead by a policeman.
Please realize this fact: Muslims follow the Quran. That book proves itself a terrorist’s handbook for violence. It stands against everything in our U.S. Constitution. It brooks no other laws. Its followers intend to conquer every country they invade. When someone like Cetin, Adan or the pressure cooker bomber in New York, 28-year-old Ahmad Khan Rahami—grow up reading the Quran, they follow its single mandate: “Convert or kill all non-believers.”
ABC anchor David Muir, Wednesday, September 14, 2016, reported that Barack Obama successfully imported 11,000 Syrian refugees into America this year. He expects to import a total of 110,000 in 2017 with Hillary’s election to the White House.
This fact remains: you cannot ‘vet’ the mind of a Muslim.
“Diversity within a nation destroys unity and leads to civil wars,” said social scientist Garret Hardin. “Immigration, a benefit during the youth of a nation, can act as a disease in its mature state. Too much internal diversity in large nations has led to violence and disintegration. We are now in the process of destabilizing our own country. The magic words of destabilizers are ‘diversity’ and ‘multiculturalism’.”
The Koran promotes violence in virtually every chapter of the book: Sura 5, verse 84 states: “Strongest among men in enmity to the believers will thou find the Jews and Pagans (Christians). Fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them, in every stratagem of war. Instill terror in the hearts of unbelievers. Cut off their heads and cut off their tips of their fingers.”
We Americans enjoy a clear mandate in this coming election in November 2016 for the presidency. If you want more Muslims and their violence and ultimately, their subverting our laws and Constitution—vote for Hillary Clinton. Her 20-year personal assistant, Muslim Huma Abedin, works fervently for Sharia Law in America. Hillary WILL import 110,000 Muslims in her first year alone. She expects to give amnesty to as high as 31 million illegal aliens. If she gains power, you will see your community overrun by Muslims, illegal aliens, crime, violence and total usurpation of your American culture.
By voting for Trump, you at least give our country a chance to survive this immigration invasion. Can you imagine another 100,000,000 (million) more immigrants in the next 30 years? Those immigrants will undermine and destroy the fabric, culture, language and ethos of America. They will overwhelm our water, energy and resources. They will turn this country into a third world hellhole. Trump will stop the refugee flooding, stop illegal aliens, deport illegal aliens already here by enforcing our current employment laws—and, he will build a wall to stop further influx not only of illegal migrants, but the drugs that tear up every community in our country. Trump will renegotiate trade laws in our favor instead of China’s. He’ll bring back jobs for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans and all Americans, especially our teens for summer jobs—by cutting off the flow of immigrants.
‪The Obama Immigration Policy Timeline Wrecking Ball: Summary
After watching that video, you realize that you, your family and community stand in the cross-hairs of history. Vote for your country, for your community and for your family. Vote Donald J. Trump for president of the United States.

The Nuclear Option: Trump Was Very Good — And Will Be Even Better ^ | 27 Sep 2016 | CHARLES HURT 

Monday night’s debate here was a tremendous victory for Donald Trump, but his performance left plenty of room for improvement.

Big picture: Polls show support for Hillary Clinton is collapsing, and she desperately needed to stanch the bleeding. She did nothing during the debate to change the trajectory of those increasingly bleak polls. SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
With states like Pennsylvania and Colorado in play this week, we could be talking about states like Michigan and Wisconsin in play next week. That would put the race away early for Mr. Trump.
Mrs. Clinton’s primary charge against Mr. Trump is that he lacks the “temperament” to be president. In an easy glide Monday night, Mr. Trump demonstrated otherwise.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Donald Trump Could Have a ‘Ronald Reagan 1980 Kind of Blowout’! ^ | 27 Sep 2016 | John Hayward 

Ed Cox, chairman of the New York Republican State Committee and son-in-law of late President Richard Nixon, offered his review of Monday night’s presidential debate on Tuesday’s Breitbart News Daily. “I thought that Donald Trump really presented a broad vision for what he wanted, which is what a president has to do,” Cox told SiriusXM host Alex Marlow.
As for Hillary Clinton, he said she offered a “very detailed, lots of words, very lawyerly kind of brief, but you fall asleep when you listen to that.”
Cox said:
When Donald Trump spoke, you really watch it because he’s going to say something significant, and he did. He’s a real leader, and that’s what came across. She’s not. He’s gotten there on his own. He has amazing political ability, so he couldn’t have gotten to where he is with, really, not raising any funds, no organization – and that ability showed itself on that stage.
“He’s a leader, and he has the ability to make decisions like a leader should make them. I’ve been with him when he has done that, and he knows how to do it,” he continued. “She’s always ridden on someone else’s coattails, either her husband’s, or now on Barack Obama’s, so she comes across as a good adviser who’s got a brief, but not as a leader.”
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Because her lips were moving: Why Hillary lost the debate!

The Hill ^ | September 27, 2016 | Kenneth R. Timmerman, contributor 

There was a popular saying among intelligence officers during the Iran-contra affair: How do you know an Iranian is lying? Because his lips are moving.
It was applied to Manucher Ghorbanifar, the mercurial intermediary; and to his boss, the so-called “moderate” Parliament speaker, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, who told Ghorbanifar he wanted to make a deal with America all the while he helped organize hostage-takings and terrorist attacks against Americans.
Hillary’s debate performance reminded me of that saying, because every time she opened her mouth to lay out her opposition research on Donald Trump, she lied or misrepresented the truth to such an extent it became unrecognizable.
American voters aren’t quite as stupid as Clinton (or the “insiders” at Politico) think, and as a slew of after-event polls showed, they weren’t falling for her lies about Trump, her phony statistics, or her breath-taking claim that life in America’s inner-cities has improved over the past twenty years. Or that her plan to raise taxes on the middle class and businesses will help the middle class and create jobs.
They recognized her slick talking points for what they were: carefully crafted attacks, scripted by pollsters and political consultants, aimed at appealing to specific demographics she felt were “must win” for her flailing and divisive campaign.
Need to increase her share of the “women’s vote?” Why, call Trump a sexist because of his comments about Rosie O’Donnell’s pig-like appearance and behavior. (As Trump acknowledged, most people who have watched Rosie O’Donnell agree with him).
Need to increase her share of the “black vote?” Why, call out Trump for inventing “the racist lie that our first black president was not an American.”
Trump garnered nation-wide attention for being the only Republican who persisted in demanding that Obama release his long-form birth certificate to put the “birther racist lie” (Clinton's term) to rest. Unlike Clinton — who launched the “birther” movement during her 2008 primary campaign against Obama then conveniently forgot about it after Obama beat her — Trump succeeded.
Need to get the “union vote?” Why, claim without batting an eyelash that you believe in “smart, fair trade deals” when Clinton called the Trans Pacific Partnerships the “gold standard of trade deals” and has never called for modifying NAFTA which her husband signed into law, to correct its enormous flaws. (Even the normally left-wing PolitiFact concluded in its ‘Truth-o-meter:’ “Trump is right, Clinton flip-flopped on TPP.”)
Trump is a boxer, not a politician. And by jabbing at his opponents, countering their every blow, he put away sixteen skilled politicians in the GOP primary. And he put away Clinton last night.
Clinton clearly thought she could deflect his jabs and land a knock-out punch near the end, by countering Trump’s critique of the failed Iran deal she helped to craft as secretary of state.
In a set piece clearly written ahead of time by consultants, she pretended to address America’s friends and allies abroad as a statesman, speaking on behalf of her country. “I know this [i.e. Trump’s] campaign has caused some questioning and some worries with many leaders around the globe. I know. I’ve talked with a number of them. But I want to, on behalf of myself and I think on the behalf of a majority of the American people, say that our word is good.”
Sounds great. I’m sure her consultants told her (and keep telling her now), it was a “presidential” moment.
But once again, Trump the boxer hit back. “All of the things she is talking about could have been taken care of in the last ten years when she had power. And if she comes to power, she won’t take care of them.”
And again: “Hillary, she’s got experience, but it’s bad experience … This country can’t afford to have another four years of this bad experience.”
So, programmatic politician, versus the boxer. The emperor in her birthday suit of lies, versus the boy in the street proclaiming her nakedness.
Anyone who was expecting Donald Trump to lay out programs and statistics and proposals on Monday night understands nothing about this candidate, or about the movement he incarnates.
That would have been to behave as a traditional politician — like Clinton. Instead, Trump remained Trump and spoke the truth. And because he remains a truth-teller, he will win big in November. The American people are fed up with the politicians lies.

Donald J. Trump for President Celebrates Massive $18 Million Haul After Debate Win!

Donald J Trump ^ | September 27, 2016 

NEW YORK, NY – Less than 24 hours after winning last night’s debate, the Donald J. Trump Campaign (in conjunction with the RNC) has officially brought in a massive fundraising haul of $18 million, signaling momentum of historic proportions.
“As a result of Donald Trump’s huge debate win last night, we had a massive fundraising day bringing in more than $18 million. This is a movement to Make America Great Again. We are grateful for the support of millions of Americans across the country. With this kind of energy and generous support behind us, we are going to have President Donald J. Trump in the White House,” Steven Mnuchin, Finance Chairman, Donald J. Trump for President.
"The National Call Day was a tremendous success. Many donors came on board as Donald J. Trump rolls on to victory," Lew Eisenberg, Finance Chairman, Trump Victory.
Leading Team Trump’s national fundraising push was:
Team YUUUGE: Lew Eisenberg, Cara Mason, Woody Johnson, Carie Bock and Allison Macintosh
Team MAGA: Steven Mnuchin, Elliott Broidy, Ray Washburne, Brandi Marks and Amanda Ober
Team IRREDEEMABLES: Michael Cohen, Anthony Scaramucci and Lindsey Reynolds
Team DEPLORABLES: Roy Bailey, Gentry Beach, Tommy Hicks, Alden Wood, Rachel Kelley and Mallory Hunter
Team Trump Digital Fundraising: Brad Parscale
Team Trump: Governor Mike Pence, Chairman Reince Priebus, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump and Eli Miller
The Donald J. Trump for President campaign is a national grassroots movement representing the desire to break up Washington’s rigged system and Make America Great Again.

WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS… Then Drops Another Bomb

Political Insider ^ 

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character.

But there’s no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he’s willing to expose Hillary Clinton.
Now, he’s announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.

Clinton has repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

WHOA! Medical Expert Watching Debate Exposes ANOTHER Telltale Sign Hillary Likely Has PARKINSON’S

100 Percent Fed Up ^ | 9/27/2016 

How many more symptoms need to be uncovered before Hillary comes clean? Why would anyone want to take on the position of Commander In Chief if they aren’t even well enough to walk without assistance?

In the tunnel to Clinton’s vehicle after the debate, Secret Service used pointer flash lights pointing at the ground in front of Clinton’s feet (watch carefully) in order to guide Hillary through the tunnel to/into her vehicle.
Hillary entered the opposite (hidden side) of vehicle so the camera cannot see her entry.

Pointer or Laser lights are used for Parkinson’s patients.
Dr. Ted Noel discussed pointers used for Parkinson’s patients in a recent video:
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Just be right