One of the strongest arguments that shows how much Hillary hates women is her effort to ensure that a man who raped a 12-year-old girl got off with a one-year sentence.
But liberals say Hillary was just doing what she was supposed to do: use any legal trickery to ensure that the guilty walk.
This is the corrupted vision of what a fair trial is. It is what liberals have been foisting on America since the Warren Court made up rights to protect criminals.
A fair trial is one where the innocent are found innocent and the guilty are found guilty. But to liberals, a "fair" trial is one where the rules are followed irrespective of whether or not justice is served.
Clearly, police beating confessions out of defendants or breaking into houses without a warrant are not acceptable policies, but the restrictions put on the justice system by the über-liberal Warren Court go far beyond that by excluding evidence based on clerical errors.
Liberals show their true colors by constantly worrying about unjust convictions and being quite happy with unjust acquittals. We know that unjust acquittals happen because we know that critical evidence is often excluded for purely frivolous reasons. For example, a judge issues a search warrant, and the clerk accidentally puts the wrong date on the search warrant. All the evidence found in the search is excluded because of that clerical error.
By supporting the exclusion of physical evidence, liberals show that they support defense lawyers who are eager to use any trick to eliminate evidence that damages their clients' case, no matter how guilty their clients are revealed to be by that evidence.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...
