Conservative HQ
^ | 2/26/14 | CHQ Staff
We don’t usually flak for The Washington Post, but every so often the
Washington elite’s liberal “paper of record” gets something right, or at least
asks the right question.
Such was the case on Monday, February 24, when the Post published an opinion
piece by Richard Cohen entitled “Susan Rice and the retreat of American power,”
that detailed a bill of particulars against President Obama’s national security
advisor, Susan Rice, and the President himself, for the treasonous squandering
of American lives, treasure and influence in the world’s affairs.
While what happened at Benghazi, Libya and how the events there led to the
deaths of four Americans receives some treatment in Cohen’s column what
interests us is Cohen’s drilldown on the favorite tactic used by Rice and Obama
to sell their foreign policy failures as success: the false choice or straw man
of “American boots on the ground” versus doing nothing, or at least nothing
effective.
As Cohen so correctly observed: “An increasingly messy world is looking for
guidance. But not only does the United States refuse to be its policeman, it
won’t even be its hall monitor. The utterly false choice in Syria articulated by
Rice — America can do nothing because it won’t do everything — is noticed by the
rest of the world. Obama threatened ‘consequences’ if someone stepped ‘over the
line’ in Ukraine. Ah, another line. Is it red?”
Cohen, however, misses the opportunity to ask the final, and most important,
question: How would Obama enforce “consequences” even if he had the inclination
to impose them?
The President and his Secretary of Defense have just announced that the
United States military will but cut back to the lowest level it has been since
before World War II, which was the last time the dangerous threat of
super-nationalism that concludes Cohen’s article stalked Europe.
And along with the announcement of the cuts came this statement from Defense
Secretary Chuck Hagel, “we are entering an era where American dominance on the
seas, in the skies, and in space can no longer be taken for granted.”
The reason, said Hagel, is that the current force is “larger than we can
afford to modernize and keep ready.”
Translation: We blew the money we should be spending to protect America and
defend western civilization on Nancy Pelosi’s “shovel ready” stimulus program,
green energy, doubling food stamps and other Democratic Party vote-buying
schemes. So the only way we can use economic influence or expand our military
capability is to borrow more trillions from the Chinese.
The result of this is, as retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas G. McInerney put
it to Bill Gertz in an interview for The Washington Free Beacon, the Obama
administration is “continuing on its path of unilateral disarmament that was
started by Defense Secretary Robert Gates in April 2009.”
“This action,” said McInerney, “will escalate the demise of our military
unilaterally and we still have no strategy for defeating radical Islam after
9/11. This is very dangerous.”
Through the peculiar combination of lies, arrogance and ignorance that is the
hallmark of almost all Obama foreign policy actions the President has squandered
the legacy left to him by conservative Republican President Ronald Reagan, and
his anti-communist Democratic predecessors, such as President Harry Truman.
It took sixty-nine years to build America into the world's only superpower;
it has taken Obama less than six to flippantly throwaway America’s national
influence and unilaterally disarm America through a conscious and treasonous
hollowing-out of America’s military capability.
DIOGENES invites you to pull up a chair on this fine day and read posts from around the world. The writing may lean to the right...but that's the way Diogenes wants it! You may leave your opinion, but Diogenes rarely changes his! WELCOME!
-
Free Government ^ | 1997 | Sraff Free government assisted cell phone programs have become more popular, in part, due to the poor economy ...
-
The Dems went down to Georgia They was looking for a seat to steal They were in a bind, 'cause they were way behind They were willing t...