Townhall.com ^ | June 9, 2013 | Mark Baisley
I’d say it’s official; President Obama’s Watergate has arrived. And
the witty question originally formed for Nixon’s big scandal can now be
re-applied to President Plausible Deniability, “What did he not know and
when did he not know it?” While I do think that IRS-Gate spells the end
of this President’s ability to effectively advance the liberal agenda, I do not
see an impeachment on the horizon; at least not for Barack Obama – but perhaps
for the Sixteenth Amendment.
The recent parade of citizen witnesses to congressional hearings has laid
bare the raw suffering that inevitably comes from tolerating the existence of a
despotic government agency. To gain an appreciation for the IRS scandal,
one need only hear the eight minute statement
from citizen Becky Gerritson before the House Ways and Means Committee.
Gerritson’s elocution should be required viewing for every citizen and immigrant
over the age of 16, perhaps set to an inspirational John Williams
soundtrack. Juxtaposed to Ms. Gerritson are the strained testimonies
from IRS employees where I keep expecting to hear that fast paced Benny Hill music
welling up in the background.
The righteous momentum against IRS arrogance creates an opportunity for
righting a 100–year-old wrong. This past February 3rd marked exactly one
century since the Sixteenth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution was ratified,
giving Congress the “power to lay and collect taxes on incomes.”
This disastrous decision ultimately reversed the positions of servant and master
between America’s citizens and their federal government.
The accounting nightmare created by today’s 50,000 pages of tax law and
regulations has produced a natural hostility between citizens and government,
acted out on annual and quarterly cycles. Misinterpretations and
non-compliance result in fines, property seizure, and criminal prosecution. The
enforcement power given to the agency strikes fear in taxpayers, businesses,
charities, and churches, and the temptation has proven to be too much.
Politicians and bureaucrats have leveraged this position to influence desired
behaviors.
The institutional corruption of government cruelty toward political advantage
has placed Washington, DC on a crash course with Mount Rushmore. But
while Democrats and Republicans fight over the control stick, National Review
correspondent Kevin Williamson has
been unbuckling his seatbelt and strapping on a wingsuit.
Williamson’s new book arrives with the most appealing (albeit lengthy) title of
any political commentary that I have ever seen: “The End Is Near and It's
Going to Be Awesome: How Going Broke Will Leave America Richer, Happier, and
More Secure.”
Williamson is right, of course, that the current arrangement is completely
unsustainable. And rather than scream all the way into the mountainside,
I agree with Williamson that we should prepare to step in with solutions
that reflect the Founding Fathers’ pre-Sixteenth-Amendment wisdom. And in
an attempt to out-play us, watch for liberals to begin supporting a flat tax
solution.
The IRS is appropriately being criticized by both major parties.
Releasing the Commissioner into an early retirement does not equal the crime. A
systemic change must come to the collection of taxes for the federal
government. But the Democrats will soon realize that too much of a change will
ruin their ability to control the masses on an individual basis. And by
modifying the current complexity to a flat tax, Democrats would trade short term
manipulations for maintaining their long term position of control over the
individual.
A flat tax would merely simplify the fiasco. It would not resolve
anything. Taxing income is the problem. Republicans should move to repeal the
Sixteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution.
There are two worthy alternatives on the table right now; the Liberty
Amendment and the Fair Tax. In 1998 Congressman Ron Paul (R-TX) first
introduced the Liberty Amendment, a
straightforward proposal that repeals the ability to tax income and restricts
the federal government to programs specifically enumerated in the Constitution.
In 1999 Congressman John Linder (R-GA) first introduced legislation known as the
Fair
Tax Act. The Fair Tax has received more congressional member support
than both the Liberty Amendment and flat tax schemes.
The Liberty Amendment does not attempt to provide solutions to the lost
revenues for the federal government. For me, the wisdom in this approach
is a forced reduction in the size of the federal government along with
re-thinking revenue sources.
The Fair Tax begins with a national sales tax as a replacement for income
tax. The IRS is eliminated and the economy would receive a certain
boost. It also attempts to replace welfare, unemployment, and other government
social involvements with a unified monthly cash payment to every legal
resident. The idea here is to collect enough sales tax to fund the government
and to send a minimal subsistence payment to everyone, no matter how rich or
poor they happen to be.
Ron Paul said of the Fair Tax, “We don’t need to replace the income tax at
all. I see a consumption tax as being a little better than the personal income
tax, and I would vote for the Fair Tax if it came up in the House of
Representatives, but it is not my goal. We can do better.” There is a lot
to like about the Fair Tax and a lot to be concerned about, especially the
opportunity for liberal mischief in developing dependencies with the cash
payments.
But regardless of the final revenue solution, we need to head Rahm Emanuel’s advice
that, “You never want a serious crisis to go to waste.” It has now been
proven beyond any reasonable doubt that the existence of an agency such as the
IRS is too great of a temptation for ambitious politicians. The Sixteenth
Amendment must be repealed. Further, the very purpose of taxation should
be refined to funding government operations. It should never be allowed
for social engineering, redistributions, punishment, or spying.
Or as Becky Gerritson bravely told the government in person, “It’s not your
right to assert an agenda.”
DIOGENES invites you to pull up a chair on this fine day and read posts from around the world. The writing may lean to the right...but that's the way Diogenes wants it! You may leave your opinion, but Diogenes rarely changes his! WELCOME!
-
Free Government ^ | 1997 | Sraff Free government assisted cell phone programs have become more popular, in part, due to the poor economy ...
-
The Dems went down to Georgia They was looking for a seat to steal They were in a bind, 'cause they were way behind They were willing t...