GOP The Daily Dose ^ | May 4, 2013 | Dr. Eowyn
British National Archives show a son was born to Obama Sr. in 1961 in Kenya 
Posted on 4 May, 2013 by Amy 
the-national-archives 
by Dr. Eowyn | 
The [British] National Archives (BNA) is an executive agency of the 
government of the United Kingdom. Based in Kew in southwest London, the BNA is 
the UK government’s official archive, containing 1,000 years of history from 
Domesday Book to the present, with records from parchment and paper scrolls to 
digital files and archived websites, including Foreign Office and Colonial 
Office correspondence and files. The collections held by the BNA can be searched 
using their online catalogue. Entrance to the Archives is free. 
On April 18, 2012, the BNA released the first batch of thousands of “lost” 
colonial-era files believed to have been destroyed, including files on Britain’s 
former colony of Kenya. Reporters at the UK’s The Guardian were among the first 
who looked at some of the newly released colonial files. They found that the 
name of Barack Obama (henceforth, Obama Sr.), the father of the POS in the White 
House, is on the top of a list of names revealed in a hitherto secret British 
colonial file of Kenyans studying in the United States. 
But it’s not just UK journalists who can access the British National 
Archives; anyone can. In May 2012, someone conducted a search of the Archives 
using the search term “Obama” and found that an unnamed son of Obama Sr. was 
born in Kenya in 1961. Since the POS in the White House is the only known son of 
Obama Sr. born after 1960 and before 1963 when Kenya became officially 
independent from the UK, it is reasonable for us to conclude that the POS is 
that unnamed son of Obama Sr. born in Kenya in 1961. And in fact, the claimed 
birth date of the POS is August 4, 1961. 
barack-sr-dunham 
Barack Hussein Obama Sr. (l); Stanley Ann Dunham (r). For a couple who 
supposedly married and had a child together, it is odd to say the least that 
there is not a single photo of Obama and Dunham together. Below are excerpts 
from Dan Crosby’s on-site report from Kew for The Daily Pen, “Obama’s Kenya 
Birth Records Discovered in British National Archives,” July 18, 2012: 
Evidence discovered shows British Protectorate of East Africa recorded 
Obama’s birth records before 1963 and sent returns of those events to Britain’s 
Public Records Office and the Kew branch of British National Archives. [...] 
It now appears the worst fears of the U.S. Constitution’s framers were well 
founded as investigators working on behalf of the ongoing investigation into the 
Constitutional eligibility of Barack Obama have found yet another lead in a 
growing mountain of evidence within the public records section of the British 
National Archives indicating the occurrence of at least four vital events 
registered to the name of Barack Obama, taking place in the British Protectorate 
of East Africa (Kenya) between 1953 and 1963, including the birth of two sons 
before 1963. 
Recall, investigative journalists working for Breitbart.com have already 
discovered biographical information published by Barack Obama’s literary agent 
in which he claimed he was born in Kenya. Prior to Obama’s ensconcement to the 
White House, many international stories also stated that Obama was Kenyan-born 
as did members of Kenya’s legislative assembly. Since then information on 
Obama’s ties has been curtailed by government officials as the Obama 
administration has coincidentally paid nearly $4 billion dollars for capital 
projects in Kenya. 
Also, the presence of Obama’s mother, Ann Dunham, cannot be accounted for 
from February, 1961, the alleged month of her marriage to Obama, until three 
weeks after the birth of Obama II in August, 1961 when she allegedly applied for 
college courses at the University of Washington. Theories about her whereabouts 
have included that she participated in the Air Lift America project as an 
exchange student and traveled to Nairobi as one of many recent high school 
graduates (see AASF Report 1959-1961). 
The record of birth of a second son prior to Kenyan independence is 
significant because biographical information about Obama’s family indicates 
Obama Sr. fathered only one other son prior to Obama II’s birth. 
The books containing hand written line records of vital events attributed to 
Obama [Sr.] are contained in Series RG36 of the Family Records section in the 
Kew branch of the BNA. The hand written line records first discovered in 2009, 
indicate several events were registered to the name Barack Obama (appears to be 
handwritten and spelled “Burack” and “Biraq”) beginning in 1953 and include two 
births recorded in 1958 and 1960, a marriage license registration in 1954 and a 
birth in 1961. Barack Obama [Sr.] is said to have died in 1982 and had married 
at least once more in Kenya and had at least one more child in 1968, but no 
record of these were found in the BNA because, according to the Archives’ desk 
reference, the events occurred after Kenya achieved independence from British 
colonial rule in 1963. 
To date, Barack Obama II is the only known alleged son of Obama Sr. born 
after 1960 and before the independence of Kenya became official in 1963. 
A request for information from the BNA on the specification of birth 
information contained in the series of thousands of logs indicates that only 
vital events registered in Kenya’s Ministry of Health offices were recorded in 
the registration returns and were placed in the National Archives care before 
they reached 30 years old (the law was amended to 20 years after creation in 
2010). 
The line records do not specify the identity or names of the children, only 
gender. However, the line records are associated with index numbers of actual 
microfilm copies of certificates, licenses and registration applications filed 
in the archives. According to researchers, Obama [Sr.]’s line records were 
discovered in Series RG36, reference books. Not surprisingly, when researchers 
specifically requested access to the relevant microfilm for the Obama [Sr.] 
birth registrations, they were told that the records were currently held under 
an outdated “privileged access” status, meaning researchers were denied access 
under Chapter 52, Sections 3 and 5 of the British Public Records Act of 1958. 
However, evidence shows these records were available for public access before 
August of 2009, the approximate date of arrival of Hillary Clinton in Great 
Britain during her trip to Africa that year. 
http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/information-management/access-to-public-records.pdf 
Several sources show that Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton made a sudden 
visit to the British Foreign and Commonwealth Office, the British agency which 
oversees Public Records Archives from colonial protectorates, to speak with the 
Chief Executive of the Archives in early August of 2009. African news agency 
expressed surprise at Clinton’s arrival since she did not announce her 
intentions of stopping in Great Britain before embarking on her two week trip to 
Africa. 
For someone who wanted to remain in America, it’s difficult to imagine any 
reason why Barack Obama’s alleged father, Barack the elder, would omit the birth 
of an “anchor baby” son on an application to extend his visa, just days after 
the birth occurred, unless… 
The American people were told by Barack Obama, unequivocally, that his father 
was a former goat herder from Kenya. However, INS documents filed in the very 
same month after Obama’s birth suggest the goat herding elder Obama didn’t “get 
the memo” that he was a daddy. 
On August 31st, 1961, just weeks after Obama’s birth was allegedly registered 
in a regional office of the Hawaiian Health Department, Obama the elder 
neglected to name his newborn son on an application for extension of his 
temporary visa to stay in the U.S. 
Obama’s omission of the birth is astonishing and illogical given the fact 
that the acknowledgement of the birth would have fortified Obama’s application 
for an extension. The INS has long been more willing to extend the visa of a 
foreign parent of children born in the U.S., especially when the other parent is 
an American citizen. 
Despite the recent release of a documentary film “Dreams From My Real Father” 
presenting evidence that Barack Hussein Obama is not the biological father of 
the younger Obama, the elder Obama is the man named as the father on the digital 
image of Obama’s alleged 1961 “Certificate of Live Birth” which was posted to 
the internet by the administration in April of 2011. The document image has 
since been forensically examined by law enforcement investigators and determined 
to be a digitally fabricated forgery using Adobe software. 
[...], in 2011, it was reported by The Daily Pen after an investigation of 
the State of Hawaii’s birth statistics collection protocols and vital records 
history that birth certificates are often amended after the birth while the 
original paper document is sealed under strict confidentiality rules when the 
identity of the father is either determined after birth or when the father named 
on the new version of the certificate has adopted or assumed paternal 
responsibility for the child. 
In the latter case, the original birth record may not contain the biological 
father’s name because the mother does not provide it, or it may list paternity 
as “unknown”, but this version is kept confidential under HRS 571. [...] 
Therefore, the paternity of the child at the actual time of the birth is not 
disclosed while the new amended certificate is upheld as the original version 
displaying the name of the newly identified or adoptive father as 
indistinguishable if different from the biological father. This law is meant to 
protect the child from stigmas resulting from illegitimacy, rape, incest or 
adultery. Under these circumstances it is not possible to know the paternal 
status of a child at birth unless the original birth record is made accessible 
by authorized persons under Hawaiian law. 
[...] If Obama [Sr.] is not the biological father, or if paternal information 
is listed on the original certificate as “unknown”, the state of Hawaii keeps 
this information secret until a court orders the documents to be released for 
discovery purposes in determining Obama’s eligibility. Thus far, courts have 
lacked courage to uphold the Constitution thereby propagating the greatest 
political fraud in American history. Judges are simply washing their hands of 
the issue by refusing to even consider actual evidence against Obama, denying 
citizens of justice and their Constitutional right to a redress of grievances, 
because they simply do not have the courage to face the legal crisis such a 
revelation would cause. 
[...] Despite evidence indicating that Obama was simultaneously married to a 
woman in Kenya, it is suspected that he claimed to be married to Dunham in order 
to use the marriage as leverage to remain in the U.S. There is no evidence or 
testimony that Obama [Sr.] ever loved Dunham or that the two had ever been 
engaged. The two did not live together before or after being married and there 
were no letters, no ring, no announcement or, most importantly, no legal 
marriage registration with the State of Hawaii. 
Despite a complete void of documented proof of the marriage, it appears 
Dunham was granted a statutory divorce from Obama in 1964. However, images 
posted of the court documents from the decree contain no original documented 
proof of a marriage or legal documents showing that Obama was the father of 
Dunham’s child. A review of the court documents shows that at least one 
document, perhaps an original birth certificate for baby Obama, was missing from 
the numbering sequence. 
Being legitimately married to a U.S. citizen would be a benefit toward 
allowing a foreign spouse to remain the U.S. However, no marriage license 
application or public announcement has ever been found to indicate that Obama 
and Dunham were ever married or that Obama [Sr.] had even divorced his Kenyan 
wife prior to an alleged wedding with Dunham. This fact supports the contents of 
memos from college and INS officials who expressed doubts about the legitimacy 
of Obama’s relationship with Dunham, even questioning the motive of such a union 
between a teenage woman and a foreign student facing visa expiration just days 
after the birth of her child. 
[...] Government officials in Hawaii, including Governor Neil Abercrombie, 
Lt. Governor Brian Schatz and former Hawaiian elections official, Tim Adams have 
all indicated that they could find no original record of Obama’s alleged birth 
in any hospital in Hawaii in the course of their duties to verify his 
eligibility. The absence of verifiable birth documentation was so apparent that 
Schatz, serving as the chairman of the Democrat Party of Hawaii in 2008, refused 
to certify that Obama was indeed constitutionally eligible to hold the office of 
presidentwhen he submitted the Official Certification of Nomination of Obama. 
Schatz deferred the responsibility to Nancy Pelosi and DNC, and then Chair of 
the Hawaiian Elections Commission, Kevin Cronin. Cronin resigned suddenly after 
controversy surrounding his decision began to strain his relationship with the 
commission. 
[...] Liars and abettors in media and government, drudging on behalf of the 
Obama administration, have anchored their Alinsky-style ridicule of those 
questioning Obama’s eligibility in a delusion that he must be legitimate because 
his birth was announced in two Hawaiian newspapers. 
[...] Hawaii has a long history of allocating foreign births to the mother’s 
claimed Hawaiian residence regardless of the actual location of the birth, which 
was in compliance with guidelines established by the National Center for Health 
Statistics in order to accurately attribute data from births with decadal Census 
figures. [...] The impact of population figures on the Hawaii’s economy and 
agency resources was very significant in 1961. The accuracy of the Census takes 
precedence over the accuracy and veracity of vital statistics in the U.S. [...] 
According to Dan Crosby, the specific sources of information pertaining to 
births of Kenyan nationals under British jurisdiction can be researched in the 
following BNA files (Courtesy: British National Archives): 
General Register Office SERIES RG36 Registers and Returns of Births, 
Marriages and Deaths in the Protectorates etc of Africa and Asia Legal status: 
Public Record(s) Language: English Creator names: General Register Office, 
1836-1970 Covering Birth Registration dates: 1895-1965 Physical description: 15 
volume(s) Access conditions: Available in microform only Held by: The National 
Archives, Kew Scope and content: Notifications forwarded by officials 
responsible for civil registration under administrative ordinances in Nyasaland, 
Kenya, Somaliland, Uganda, Sudan, Palestine, Sarawak, Malaya, including Johore 
and Selangor, and British North Borneo, commencing at varying dates. Publication 
note: Geoffrey Yeo ‘The British Overseas, A Guide to Records of Their Births, 
Baptisms, Marriages, Deaths and Burials Available in the United Kingdom’, 
London, 2nd edn, 1988. Related material: Some earlier returns from the East 
African territories in the period during which they were under Foreign Office 
control are in the consular registers retained in the custody of the registrar 
general. Place: Kenya, Africa (Territory Thereof): 1920 – 1963 Subjects: Birth: 
registration 
Read more at 
http://fellowshipofminds.wordpress.com/2012/08/24/british-national-archives-show-a-son-was-born-to-obama-sr-in-1961-in-kenya/
DIOGENES invites you to pull up a chair on this fine day and read posts from around the world. The writing may lean to the right...but that's the way Diogenes wants it! You may leave your opinion, but Diogenes rarely changes his! WELCOME!
- 
Today Dispatch ^ Oops! Apparently, the state of Rhode Island had 150,000 people incorrectly placed on their voter rolls and nobody not...
- 
Army Times ^ | May 7, 2017 | Todd South After carrying the M16 or one of its cousins across the globe for more than half a century, sol...
 
