By Mark Finkelstein
Effete: affected, overrefined, and ineffectual; see
"Chris Hayes." the name of the MSNBC host to the dictionary
definition. But if ever you wanted to see the human embodiment of the adjective
in action, have a look at the video from his MSNBC show this morning of the
too-refined-by-half Hayes explaining why he is "uncomfortable" in
calling America's fallen military members "heroes."
Hayes is worried that doing so is "rhetorically proximate" to justifications for more war. Oh, the rhetorical proximity! View the video
.
Hayes is worried that doing so is "rhetorically proximate" to justifications for more war. Oh, the rhetorical proximity! View the video
.
CHRIS HAYES: Thinking today and observing Memorial Day,
that'll be happening tomorrow. Just talked with Lt. Col. Steve Burke [sic,
actually Beck], who was a casualty officer with the Marines and had to tell
people [inaudible]. Um, I, I, ah, back sorry, um, I think it's interesting
because I think it is very difficult to talk about the war dead and the fallen
without invoking valor, without invoking the words "heroes." Um, and, ah, ah,
why do I feel so comfortable [sic] about the word "hero"? I feel comfortable,
ah, uncomfortable, about the word because it seems to me that it is so
rhetorically proximate to justifications for more war. Um, and, I don't want to
obviously desecrate or disrespect memory of anyone that's fallen, and obviously
there are individual circumstances in which there is genuine, tremendous
heroism: hail of gunfire, rescuing fellow soldiers and things like that. But it
seems to me that we marshal this word in a way that is problematic. But maybe
I'm wrong about that.
Read more: http://newsbusters.org/blogs/mark-finkelstein/2012/05/27/chris-hayes-im-uncomfortable-calling-fallen-military-heroes#ixzz1w5tXRLX2