Thursday, October 6, 2016

Luntz focus group: Yeah, we don’t care about Trump’s taxes, but Hillary’s emails…

Hot Air ^ | October 6, 2016 | Larry O'Connor 

According to pollster Frank Luntz and his famous “undecided focus group” extravaganzas he holds after every debate, American voters aren’t nearly as worked up about Donald Trump’s tax returns as the media and Clinton campaign appear to be. In fact, according to Luntz’ appearance on CBS Wednesday, voters might be interested in getting tax tips from the GOP nominee:
(VIDEO-AT-LINK)

“Nobody wants to pay taxes. As long as you don’t break the law, as long as you didn’t do anything unethical, tax payers are fed up with the tax code and they actually did not hold him responsible for that. What they don’t like is how his employees were treated. The goal for the average American is to find some way to reduce their taxes.”
Luntz also noted that the undecided voters “are more upset over Hillary Clinton’s emails than they are about Trump’s tax returns,” and he added “that email issue is going to continue, I think, into the next two debates.”
This cuts against what the media and the debate moderators have een focusing on. Lester Holt made absolutely no reference during last weeks debate to Hillary Clinton’s use of an unauthorized, non-secure, non-government email server to conduct her official business while Secretary of State. He did initiate a laborious exchange over Trump’s tax returns, though.
If the media and debate moderators really want to get these candidates to talk about issues the American voter cares about, they’d start probing deeper into the email issue.
Don’t hold your breath.

Obama Administration Is Quietly Delaying Thousands of Deportation Cases

The New York Times ^ | 06 October 2016 | CAITLIN DICKERSON 

The Obama administration is delaying deportation proceedings for recent immigrants in cities across the United States, allowing more than 56,000 of those who fled Central America since 2014 to remain in the country legally for several more years.
The shift, described in interviews with immigration lawyers, federal officials and current and former judges, has been occurring without public attention for months. It amounts to an unannounced departure from the administration’s widely publicized pronouncements that cases tied to the so-called surge of 2014 would be rushed through the immigration courts in an effort to deter more Central Americans from entering the United States illegally.
The delayed cases are those of nearly half of the Central Americans who entered the United States as families since 2014, and close to a quarter of the total number of Central Americans who entered during that period.
The delays are being made as a cost-saving measure, according to federal officials, because of a lapse in enforcement that allowed immigrants who were supposed to be enrolled in an electronic monitoring program to go free. Some of those affected had failed to report to government offices to be fitted with G.P.S. ankle bracelets, according to a February memo from the chief immigration judge, Print Maggard, in Arlington, Va.
Now that the government will not have to pay the daily fee of $4 to $8 a person that it costs to monitor such bracelets, the immigrants’ cases have been pushed back for years, some until 2023, judges and federal officials said. The cases of those who met their reporting obligations are still being expedited, with some cases moving faster than lawyers and judges had expected.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...

Hillary Will Deny It, But Ed Klein Has a Proven Record of Being Right

Townhall.com ^ | October 6, 2016 | Aryssa Damron 

When Ed Klein’s Guilty as Sin hit stands on October 4th, 2016, the Clinton “Slime Room” went into overdrive to try and convince the media that author Ed Klein is not to be trusted. Clinton cronies like David Brock, Brian Fallon, Sid Blumenthal and Philippe Reines paint Klein as a “discredited author,” blatantly ignoring Klein’s proven track-record of reporting.
Who is Ed Klein? He’s a #1 New York Times bestselling author, a seasoned investigative journalist, and a man who is not afraid to expose what Hillary has done in her quest for the White House. He has written numerous books on the Clintons have been heralded for their investigative qualities and, of course, have been downplayed by the Leftist mainstream media as lies. The Left cannot deny the numerous times Ed Klein proved to be right, though.
Ed Klein was the first journalist to uncover the true story behind Hillary Clinton’s fainting and concussion while she was Secretary of State. Since then, he has been reporting on Hillary’s serious health issues, which we all saw come to a head when a passerby filmed Hillary’s collapse and incriminating frailty at the 9/11 memorial service just weeks ago. After that, the media couldn’t ignore it anymore.
Ed Klein was also the first journalist to report on the jealous and antipathy that divided, and continues to divide, the Obamas and the Clintons, in his book, Blood Feud. The Left denied these claims, but the truth was revealed in September of 2016 when Colin Powell’s emails were leaked to the public.
In August of 2012, Klein broke the story that Obama had offered Hillary Clinton his vice-presidential spot, something no one else was talking about. A year later, Mark Halperin and John Heilemann further confirmed the fact in their book, Double Down.
It isn’t just Hillary Clinton that Ed Klein has been consistently correct about. He’s also been a major player in the journalism of Barack Obama’s presidency.
Klein coined the nickname “The Amateur”for Barack Obama, in a book by the same name, and since then, multiple journalists, including Pulitzer Prize-winning Charles Krauthammer, have adopted that name for the president.
In an op-ed for The Daily Caller, Klein unmasked Valerie Jarrett’s shadow presidency and her fighting with chief of staff Rahm Emanuel. More than three months later, the New York Times bit off from Klein’s work and published an article about Jarrett called “The Other Power in the West Wing.”
The Clinton “Slime Room” will try their hardest to keep the revelations of Guilty as Sin under wraps, but when the author has such a proven track record of being right, it will ultimately be for naught. Pick up Guilty as Sin: Uncovering New Evidence of Corruption and How Hillary Clinton and the Democrats Derailed the FBI Investigation and learn the secrets, scandals, and health scares that Hillary would love for you to never hear about. Then, watch live as Hillary Clinton’s candidacy confirms everything Klein has reported.

How the Clinton Foundation Got Rich off the Haitian Poor

National Review ^ | July 16, 2016 | Dinesh D'Souza 

Haitians like Andre may sound a bit strident, but he and the protesters had good reason to be disgruntled. They had suffered a heavy blow from Mother Nature, and now it appeared that they were being battered again — this time by the Clintons. Their story goes back to 2010, when a massive 7.0 earthquake devastated the island, killing more than 200,000 people, leveling 100,000 homes, and leaving 1.5 million people destitute.
(Excerpt) Read more at nationalreview.com ...

Obama shortens sentences for 102 more federal inmates!

Breitbart ^ | 6 Oct 2016 

The latest round brings to 774 the number of sentences Obama has commuted, including 590 this year. The White House says it’s more than the previous 11 presidents put together.
Almost all of those receiving commutations were convicted of drug-related offenses. Most are considered nonviolent offenders, although some were convicted of firearms charges in connection with drug crimes.
Many of the recipients had been serving life sentences.
(Excerpt) Read more at breitbart.com ...

Barbara Boxer & Chelsea Clinton join Bill Clinton in slamming ObamaCare!

Canada Free Press ^ | 10/06/16 | Robert Laurie 

Single Payer push!

On Tuesday, I talked about the real reason Bill Clinton and The New York Times had suddenly decided to attack ObamaCare as an expensive, confusing, unworkable mess. Far from being an off-the-cuff comment, I argued, Bill was doing exactly what he’d been ordered to do. The left is salivating over the federal power that would come with a single payer system, Hillary’s wanted one for decades, and they need to boost support in key liberal demos. This is their pivot moment.
As I wrote two days ago:
It’s time to pivot toward single payer. Of course, this was the plan all along. ObamaCare was designed to fail. It was, famously, a “step on the path” to a fully government-run system. Hillary has decided it’s time to move forward on the road to single-payer.

Police ordered to run away from armed criminals in Los Angeles

The Coach's Team | 10/6/16 | Doug Book 

In left-wing Los Angeles, where defending oneself with a firearm is strictly frowned upon by the upper crust (after all, that’s what highly paid body guards are for) it has now been decided that police officers must run away like frightened children rather than challenge anyone brandishing a deadly weapon. In short, officers of the Los Angeles Police Department—Angelino’s first and last line of defense in the MAY issue, concealed carry license State of California—have been instructed to allow armed lunatics to go their merry way, attacking defenseless citizens, before confronting and threatening them with potential harm!
Such was the decision last month of the Los Angeles Police Commission, a 5 member board appointed by the mayor. Composed of individuals with NO law enforcement experience, the Board of Police Commissioners "...is the head of the Los Angeles Police Department. They set the overall policy while the Chief of Police manages the daily operations of the Department and implements the Board’s policies and goals.”
The Board’s policy decision came about after “a female suspect, armed with an 8 to 9-inch knife, charged at officers, repeatedly ignored commands to stop, and was recorded yelling ‘shoot me’ as she swung her knife from side to side.” Both the officer whose life was being immediately threatened by the “suspect” and his partner, standing just a few feet away, shot her after she had rapidly closed the 70 foot distance between them and her blade to just 3 feet.
And no, there isn’t any dispute over the facts of the case. The Board agreed that videotaped evidence proved everything had happened in exactly the way officers had described.
So why would the Board demand that the officers involved be charged criminally, claiming quite incorrectly that they had violated department rules for the use of deadly...

BREAKING: BILL CLINTON...COMMITTED A CRIME SO HORRENDOUS THAT THE SENTENCE IS LIFE IN PRISON!

silenceisconsent.net/DailyMail ^ | Oct 5, 2010 | Shockwave 

BREAKING: BILL CLINTON JUST COMMITTED A CRIME SO HORRENDOUS THAT THE SENTENCE IS LIFE IN PRISON!
It has now become apparent that Bill Clinton committed one of the most horrific crimes in US History the same day he met with Loretta Lynch on her private jet.
One of Bill Clinton’s most trusted legal advisers leaked that the former President intentionally ambushed Lynch that day and blackmailed her into promising NOT to charge Hillary Clinton for her email servers.
The adviser revealed to legendary journalist Edward Klein: ‘BILL SAID, “I WANT TO BUSHWHACK LORETTA…”
The adviser revealed to legendary journalist Edward Klein:

‘BILL SAID, “I WANT TO BUSHWHACK LORETTA. I’M GOING TO BOARD HER PLANE. WHAT DO YOU THINK?”

‘AND I SAID, “THERE’S NO DOWNSIDE FOR YOU, BUT SHE’S GOING TO TAKE A POUNDING IF SHE’S CRAZY ENOUGH TO LET YOU ON HER PLANE”.’

Excerpt, read more at silenceisconsent.net

Hillary Caught Using Child Actor At Pennsylvania Town Hall

zero hedge ^ | Oct 5, 2016 4:50 PM | by Tyler Durden 


At a Hillary Clinton town hall yesterday in Haverford, Pennsylvania, a 15 year old girl was supposedly "chosen at random" to ask a question of the former Secretary of State.  But, the well-scripted performance raised some suspicion with a YouTuber named Spanglevisionwho decided to dig a little deeper.  And, wouldn't you know it, the "random" participant was none other than child actor,Brennan Leach, whose father just happens to be Pennsylvania democratic State Senator Daylin Leach.  Oh, and in case it wasn't obvious, Daylin supports Hillary for president...shocking.
So, here was the original question from Brennan:
Brennan:
"Hi Madam Secretary.  I'm Brennan and I'm 15 years old.  At my school, body image is a really big issue for girls my age.  I see with my own eyes the damage Donald Trump does when he talks about women and how they look.  As the first female president how would you undo some of that damage and help girls understand that they're so much more than just what they look like?"
And here was Hillary's attempt at knocking the soft ball out of the park...it's almost like she knew the question was coming.
Hillary:
"I'm so proud of you for asking that question. You are right -- my opponent has just taken this concern to a new level of difficulty and meanness.  And, it's shocking when women are called names and judged solely on the basis of physical attributes.

"My opponent insulted Miss Universe. I mean, how do you get more acclaimed than that?  But, it wasn't good enough. So we can't take any of this seriously any more. We need to laugh at it. We need to refute it. We need to ignore it. And we need to stand up to it."
Here is the full analysis from Spanglevision.  Among other things, he points out that Brennan is the only participant of the night who reads her question from a prepared script.


And, of course, as pointed out by Spanglevision, the mainstream media couldn't get enough of the adorable young girl and her "brave" question.  Here's coverage from the New York Times....


...and CNN...


In fact, pretty much everyone covered the story including The Washington PostNew York MagazineThe Chicago Tribune,Cosmopolitan...it's pretty hard to find a media outlet that didn't cover it actually.
But this isn't young Brennan's first acting gig in the political circus.  Turns out her dad, Daylin, utilized her acting skills in the following campaign video when he ran for Congress back in 2014.


And, just in case you would like to see more of her acting work, here is Brennan acting in a movie entitled "Once Upon A Time Trillium Vein."


Gov. Jerry Brown and Democrats Undermining Law and Order, Dismantling California

Canada Free Press ^ | 10/05/16 | Katy Grimes 

Democrats, Jerry Brown and now Gavin Newsom want more gun-control.

How will the Asians in South Sacramento react to that, since they've been left to fend for themselves?
California’s capital city of Sacramento has a big problem: violent criminals are terrorizing Asian immigrants. City officials pride themselves on tolerance and diversity, but have responded with little more than political appeasement, leaving Asian communities afraid and vulnerable, and forcing them to take matters into their own hands.
A recent report in the Sacramento Bee found a crime wave has swept over South Sacramento’s Asian neighborhoods. According to the city’s crime report database, robberies in daylight, muggings, and frequent home invasions have targeted 300-400 Chinese immigrants. “Some residents have become so fearful that they’ve packed up and left Sacramento, said Tom Phong, owner of Welco Supermarket, who brought 2,000 signatures to the council demanding action. “We have nearly a dozen families who have moved out, even selling their house below cost just to get the hell out,” said Phong, who has lived in Sacramento for 35 years.”

Bill Clinton takes a nostalgia tour through working-class Ohio and finds a rash of Trump signs!

Boston Globe ^ | Oct. 5, 2016 | By Annie Linskey 

Clinton took his legendary campaign skills on a tour this week through Mahoning Valley, hustling for small bunches of votes in tiny towns heavily populated with white Ohioans with relatively low levels of education and modest incomes.

In other words, in this election, Donald Trump country.

These are the voters Clinton won in 1992 and 1996, but who voted Republican in later years. As his bus rolled down two-lane roads and through towns with just a few stoplights but plenty of Trump signs, the trip was one part nostalgia tour, one part policy lecture, one part desperate bid to get his wife elected.
(Excerpt) Read more at bostonglobe.com ...

Bill Clinton rape accuser: Hillary ‘needs to be held accountable’

McClatchy DC ^ | October 4, 2016 | Anita Kumar 

Juanita Broaddrick, who accused former President Bill Clinton of assaulting her nearly four decades ago, said that Hillary Clinton needed to be held accountable for the comments she’d made about the women who had accused her husband of sexual misconduct.
“It’s degradable . . . she needs to be held accountable for all of the things she did to us,” Broaddrick told AM560 “The Answer” hosts Dan Proft and Amy Jacobson for Upstream Ideas.
Broaddrick, a former Arkansas nursing home administrator who worked on Bill Clinton’s gubernatorial campaign... said she’d decided to speak out about Hillary Clinton after the candidate tweeted last year that sexual abuse victims had a right to be believed.
“I did not set out to do this. I did not start out supporting Donald Trump,” Broaddrick said. “I was only responding to a tweet Hillary Clinton sent out about all victims of sexual abuse should come forward and be believed. . . . Shame on her. Her of all people should not make that comment.”
In January, Broaddrick tweeted: “I was 35 years old when Bill Clinton, Ark. Attorney General raped me and Hillary tried to silence me. I am now 73. . . . it never goes away.”
In 1999, Broaddrick alleged that Bill Clinton had raped her in her Little Rock hotel room in 1978.... Bill Clinton has denied Broaddrick’s allegations and those of others who have accused him of misconduct.
Broaddrick said in the interview that Hillary Clinton had pushed her to remain silent about what happened. “She grabs my arm, very deliberately, and looks at me very angrily” and reminds her that everything she does could have an impact on the campaign, Broadddrick said.
Clinton’s campaign did not immediately respond to Broaddrick’s comments.
(Excerpt) Read more at mcclatchydc.com ...

Situation normal in Ash Carter’s Pentagon: completely, totally, irrevocably, absolutely fouled up (SNAFU)

US Defense Watch ^ | October 5, 2016 | Ray Starmann 

It was another stellar week inside the Pentagon social engineering maelstrom. Inside Ash Carter’s laboratory, the final stitches are being sewn on the feminized Frankenstein monster that calls itself the US military, but is nothing more than a Bob Fosse musical with weapons.
Once upon a time, when the military was actually a functioning fighting machine, transsexuals, cross dressers, aka, the Corporal Klingers of the world were kicked out and given Section 8 discharges for being mentally ill. Of course Klinger’s biggest problem was that everyone knew he really wasn’t a cross dresser, but was using it as a scheme to escape the hell of Korea. Hence, his indefinite stay on the 38th Parallel.
Flash forward to Looneyland, aka the US military in 2016, when the mentally ill are now being welcomed with open arms. In fact, the Pentagon recently issued a new handbook for transgenders and their commanders.
Transgenders are going to receive gender reassignment surgery courtesy of Aunt Samantha, who was once Uncle Sam. Furthermore, millions have been put in the Pentagon piggy bank for these services, money that could have been used to treat vets and active duty personnel with real medical issues.
As reported in the Weekly Standard this week:
The Department of Defense issued its official implementation handbook for transgender service members and their commanders on Friday, just days before a Pentagon deadline for the military to provide gender transition medical care to members of the armed forces.
According to a Pentagon spokesman, “Service members are able to get the full gamut now. Counseling, hormone therapy, surgery—the whole deal.”
Vets die in line for health care and the Pentagon makes this a priority. What a disgrace.
As “an administrative management tool,” the handbook is the core policy guide on which each of the services will base its own implementation plan. The handbook defines key terms, such as “gender dysphoria,” the clinical designation for individuals who feel that their sex and gender do not match. And in an introductory section titled “The Basics,” the handbook explains the differences between sex and gender identity, an understanding of which is now necessary for all military personnel:
The Pentagon sure has been churning out a lot of tool kits lately. There’s the commander’s tool kit for brainwashing yourself and your fellow troopers that Buffy, the cute little cheerleader next door is going to be able to go toe to toe with Joe Habibi from ISIS in a K Bar fight to the death. There are commander’s tool kits on lactation in the field, your new commander Colonel Liberace, how female Rangers can urinate while standing, the Bible as a racist, sexist document and Diversity as a Combat Multiplier.
Of course there’s no commander’s tool kit on how to set up a mortar, or how to stop a wounded soldier from bleeding to death, or how to put a hole in Ivan at 300 meters. Those things, those military type things are passé in the Chorus Line military. What matters is diversity and political correctness.
“Every person has the right to have their gender identity recognized and respected, and all Service members who receive a diagnosis that gender transition is medically necessary will be provided with support and management to transition, within the bounds of military readiness.”
The Pentagon is making it more than clear that their priorities are not fighting wars, but instead focusing on a plethora of social engineering fiascos that are wasting the military’s time and burning through taxpayer money, while real defense issues are completely ignored.
Onward diverse soldiers, marching us to disaster…
Meanwhile, that maestro of disaster, Secretary of the Navy Ray Mabus decided to scrap the Navy’s 240 year old job titles and replace them with generic sounding terms. The decision has been met with outrage by sailors who have already had enough of Mabus and the New Navy.
As reported by the Washington Free Beacon:
The U.S. Navy’s decision to scrap its 240-year-old enlisted ranking system has roiled service members and prompted tens of thousands of dissenters to petition the White House to reverse the change.
The Navy announced last Thursday that it would do away with its 91 enlisted ratings titles, unveiling new rules under which sailors are no longer identified by their job title and are instead subject to job classification similar to the Army, Marine Corps, and Air Force.
The decision ignited immediate backlash on social media and led over 47,000 critics to petition President Obama to restore the retired enlisted ranking system.
“For 241 Years Navy personnel have been identified by their Job specialty, known as a ‘Rating.’ The oldest rates such as Boatswain Mates, and Gunners Mate predate the founding of this country. Being known by your job title was a sense of pride. A sign of accomplishment,” said the petition, which faults Navy Secretary Ray Mabus and Adm. John Richardson, chief of naval operations, for “senselessly” erasing the centuries-old tradition.
In modernizing our enlisted rating system we are not only giving our sailors increased opportunities within the Navy, such as a higher level of flexibility in training and detailing, but also increasing their opportunities when they transition out of the service,” Mabus said Thursday. “In aligning the descriptions of the work our Sailors do with their counterparts in the civilian world, we more closely reflect the nation we protect while also making it easier for our Sailors to obtain the credentials they’ll need to be successful in the private sector.”
Mabus is going to go down as the most hated and most incompetent Secretary of the Navy in history. He is a walking, talking, politically correct train wreck.
While the military focuses on its main mission of feminizing itself to a point of absolute weakness and ineptitude, our enemies across the world are on the move. Tensions between the US and Russia have risen to a level not seen since the height of the Cold War.
This week, the Army Chief of Staff, General Mark Milley issued a warning to our enemies:
“I want to be clear to those who wish to do us harm….the United States military – despite all of our challenges, despite our [operational] tempo, despite everything we have been doing – we will stop you and we will beat you harder than you have ever been beaten before. Make no mistake about that,” said Milley.
You can’t have your cake and eat it too, general. You can’t feminize yourself to the point of no return and spend all of your training time on sensitivity and then talk tough. No one believes your fake John Wayne swaggering; the Russians don’t, the Chinese don’t, the Iranians don’t, the North Koreans don’t, vets certainly don’t, for we know how you and your fellow senior leaders have sat by and watched as the military has been decimated by traitors and cowards and Marxists. Vets know more than anyone what the US military is capable of doing and what it isn’t and right now, the US military isn’t capable of taking the fight to Aunt Bee and the Little Sisters of the Poor.
And, last night, in a harbinger of an unimaginable horror to come, Democratic Vice Presidential nominee, Senator Tim Kaine, with eyebrows stolen from the Grinch and a look on his face from Freddy Krueger was firing point blank rounds at his foot all night; stating that terrorism is on a decline, the military has no problems and the Iran Deal will bring peace in our time.
For God’s sake, if Trump isn’t elected, we really are doomed, aren’t we?

Small business says Trump is their pick for president!

CNBC ^ | October 5, 2016 | Lori Ioannou 

The jury is still out on how the presidential candidates will fare during the next debate, on Oct. 9, in the eyes of a key voter constituency: the small-business sector. The group that is composed of 28 million business owners is a major voting block in the upcoming election.
Yet if the last presidential debate is any guide, the Republican ticket has an advantage. According to an exclusive nationwide poll with Manta, a social network for small businesses, Trump won the first debate in the eyes of small businesses on Main Street.
Manta's survey, which polled a diverse group of 834 small-business owners nationwide between Sept. 26 and Sept. 28 revealed that Republican candidate and business mogul Donald Trump was the winner, with 58.7 percent. Democratic candidate Hillary Clinton garnered 41.3 percent of their vote....
(Excerpt) Read more at cnbc.com ...

The 'Quiet Catastrophe' Of Men Choosing To Not Seek Work

Investors Business Daily ^ | 10/06/2016 | GEORGE F. WILL 

The "quiet catastrophe" is particularly dismaying because it is so quiet, without social turmoil or even debate. It is this: After 88 consecutive months of the economic expansion that began in June 2009, a smaller percentage of American males in the prime working years (ages 25 to 54) are working than were working near the end of the Great Depression in 1940, when the unemployment rate was above 14%.
If the labor force participation rate were as high today as it was as recently as 2000, nearly 10 million more Americans would have jobs.
The work rate for adult men has plunged 13 percentage points in a half-century. This "work deficit" of "Great Depression-scale underutilization" of male potential workers is the subject of Nicholas Eberstadt's new monograph "Men Without Work: America's Invisible Crisis," which explores the economic and moral causes and consequences of this:
Since 1948, the proportion of men 20 and older without paid work has more than doubled, to almost 32%. This "eerie and radical transformation" -- men creating an "alternative lifestyle to the age-old male quest for a paying job" -- is largely voluntary.
Men who have chosen to not seek work are two and a half times more numerous than men that government statistics count as unemployed because they...
...Only about 15% of men 25 to 54 who worked not at all in 2014 said they were unemployed because they could not find work.
For 50 years, the number of men in that age cohort who are neither working nor looking for work has grown nearly four times faster than the number who are working...
...The "economically inactive" have eclipsed the unemployed...
...Eberstadt does not say that government assistance causes this...
...America ranks 22nd, ahead of only Italy, in 25 to 54 male labor force participation...
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

Liberal Attempts To Silent Dissenters Will Not End Well

Townhall.com ^ | October 6, 2016 | Kurt Schlichter 


So, that man in “Freedom of Speech,” the famous Norman Rockwell painting of an America exercising one of the liberals’ least favorite rights, stands up in 2016 to say his peace and … it will not end well. You see, to liberals, what our guy has to say isn’t important – what’s important to liberals is to shut him up. It’s to punch down upon him with cheap mockery so he’s beaten into submission. It’s to use shame to silence him and every other irredeemable deplorable in order to consolidate their progressive death grip upon America’s throat.
This will not end well.
See, a republic with democratic features like the United States can’t function without the possibility of discussion. It needs citizens to have the ability to rationally debate the issues, to be heard so that they can perceive the process as fair and one where they are equal participants. But that’s exactly what liberals, with tactics like political correctness, Jon Stewarty snark, and the outright lies of their vinyl-body-suited mainstream media chorus, seek to prevent. Discussion can only exist where customs and norms demand that all voices be heard, that the points of the opposition are at least characterized as something resembling what they are, and that no one is excluded from participation by the fact that they possess views of which the majority – or a powerful minority – disapproves. But instead of that, today we have a liberal elite that gleefully bludgeons people with opposing views into silence, and then pats itself on its collective back for its enlightenment.
This will not end well.
Take our guy in the painting. He stands and says, “Well, I don’t know about this idea of letting men into ladies rooms with little girls.” And, of course, the freakshow left doesn’t address the very real problems that come with allowing grown men into restrooms with little girls. Facts merely enrage them. So there won’t be any discussion of the problem of weirdos and perverts taking advantage of this idiotic liberal nonsense that this normal guy – like any normal person – would worry about. No, instead he’ll get berated by some screaming genderfreak activist with a half-shaved head and looming daddy issues bellowing “Hate criminal!” and demanding our guy be fired from his job down at the plant for felony wrongthinking.
Then maybe whoever that loser is who replaced Jon Stewart, that pioneer of E-Z snark masquerading as comedy, will get a clip of our guy speaking and play it on his show. There’s nothing funnier than a rustic presuming to speak out as if his views matter! Then the host will make a funny face – I mean, how can anyone be so insane and stupid to think that maybe having grown men lurking around little girls as they use the potty could go wrong? – and that goofy smirk will cue the skinny-jeaned audience to go into paroxysms of laughter. Not laughter because it’s funny or clever, mind you, but laughter that demonstrates social solidarity among the kind of smug people who drink pretentious, awful craft beers and think the “P” in “IPA” stands for “pumpkin spice.”
Maybe John Oliver will do a 10 minute rant about him and how Jesus probably told him that dudes shouldn’t be alone with little girls in toilets. Maybe Samantha Bee will scrunch up her tired, sour apple doll face and point out how this guy probably didn’t even go to Yale and where did he get that jacket anyway, at Wal-Mart?
And maybe our guy will sit down and hold his tongue. And then maybe he’ll remember how he went to a Tea Party to politely register his dissent and how he was dumped on for daring to try and be heard. Then maybe he’ll vote for Donald Trump because maybe if he’s a little louder and a little ruder then perhaps someone will listen to him about not turning his little girl’s bathroom into a social experiment, about the illegal aliens like the one who ran into his truck and didn’t have insurance, and about the rumor going around that his job down at the plant may be moving to Juarez next year.
But then, those concerns apparently aren’t worthy of attention. The news covers, day in and day out, some overeating foreigner and drug lord baby mama who Donald Trump was mean to a couple decades ago, but no reporter ever asks our guy about his problems. And they don’t merely ignore him. They come after him, jamming things down his throat like gender neutral bathrooms and murderous Muslim refugees and Wall Street scams that mean he gets about .001% interest on that money he saved just like the experts told him to. And he’s expected to just take it.
This will not end well.
Our guy was in Fallujah as a Marine, and when he wakes up shivering and calls the VA for help no one answers. President Faily McWorsethancarter hasn’t had time to fix that travesty in eight years, yet he somehow found plenty of time to party at the White House with Leonardo DiCaprio.
Leonardo has a jet and the president’s private email. Our guy has an F-150 with a smashed-in quarter panel and a busy signal. When he dares complain, they call him stupid, racist, and obsolete. He’s struggling to pay his mortgage yet they call him “privileged” because his great-great-great-great-great grandfather came from Glasgow. And he takes it, for now.
But this will not end well.
When the combined weight of the D.C. establishment and the media and Hollywood defeats Donald Trump, progressives face a decision point. They can change their ways and return America’s culture to how it was, where everyone gets a chance to participate, or they can double down on the new rules of mockery and exclusion to consolidate their own power.
But they are likely too foolish to realize the danger to our country as we know it, too blindly confident that they can play by one set of rules while forcing everyone else to play by another. Instead of seeking unity, they will do the opposite – more exclusion, more ostracism from self-determination for the people they consider unworthy. Despite a narrow win, they will claim a massive victory over people like our guy, a mandate to complete the subjugation of Americans like him. After all, he’s deplorable. He’s irredeemable. He’s unworthy of respect. His interests are unworthy of representation. The elite will heave a sigh of relief that the threat has passed, that with Felonia von Pantsuit in the Oval Office our guy and those like him can be safely ignored.
But this will not end well.
Our guy and millions upon millions of others will get angry. Not merely miffed as with the Tea Party, not a bit perturbed as with Trump. Angry. Coldly furious not only that they have been exiled from their own republic but because they have been relentlessly insulted, abused, humiliated – and forced to pay for it all.
Because the elite will have made it clear that the system really is rigged against those outside their caste, and that there is no way for people like our guy to be heard merely by trying to be part of the existing political system. And instead of meekly submitting, millions and millions of people may begin to look to step outside of the system as currently constituted.

Are They Planning to call The Election a Fraud if Trump Wins?

MArtin Armstrong blog ^ | Oct 3, 2016 | Martin Armstrong 

There is a very interesting rumor from behind the curtain. What they are concerned about is that Trump has raised more from small donors under $200 than any previous Republican in history. Even John McCain in 2008 and Mitt Romney in 2012 collected less than $64 million. They are concerned that more small people are donating to Trump and that means it is the small people who vote, whereas hedge fund managers and bankers can give her millions, but one vote.
They are starting to set the stage for calling the entire election a FRAUD and pinning the blame on Putin. That’s right. They are saying already in preparation that Russia is hacking into the voting systems to make sure Trump wins. There have been rumors for years that Obama would declare Martial Law and suspend the election process. Interestingly enough, mow it is not the lunatic fringe who are starting to say that would be appropriate if Obama can claim the election was a FRAUD. Even Ben Carson, a black neurosurgeon and a former 2016 Republican presidential candidate, has publicly stated that Obama may declare Martial Law concerning the elections. This is probably a stretch, but the core of the issue is not to prevent an election, only to prevent someone from taking office claiming FRAUD should they win. I doubt Obama could pull this off peacefully. These people not only believe their own bullshit, they often drown in it.
The most troublesome part of this rumor from behind the curtain is that should the President declare Martial Law claiming the election is a FRAUD being hacked by Russia, this would then allow Obama to bypass the two-term max and remain as president until it is considered “safe.” It is common knowledge Obama does not like the Clintons. It is not likely that Obama would halt the entire 2016 election as many speculate. However, he could halt the swearing-in claiming it’s a sham orchestrated by Putin. You already have 99% of the press endorsing Hillary so they will put that story on the headlines and support such a move.
This is not a battle between two great candidates. This is a battle between the corruption on Capitol Hill and it happens to be Trump on the other side. The same result would unfold with anyone who was an outsider even if Trump was not making stupid comments here and there. So once again; It ain’t over til the fat lady sings.

NEWSBREAKING: Fraudulent Clinton Votes Discovered By The “Tens Of Thousands”

http://donaldtrumpnews.co ^ | 6OCT16 | Via ILMF 

Election officials in Franklin County, Ohio are reportedly stumped over what one maintenance worker found in a dilapidated downtown Columbus warehouse earlier this week.
According to sources, Randall Prince, a Columbus-area electrical worker, was doing a routine check of his companies wiring and electrical systems when he stumbled across approximately one dozen black, sealed ballot boxes filled with thousands of Franklin County votes for Hillary Clinton and other Democrat candidates.
“No one really goes in this building. It’s mainly used for short-term storage by a commercial plumber,” Prince said.
So when Prince, who is a Trump supporter, saw several black boxes in an otherwise empty room, he went to investigate. What he found could allegedly be evidence of a massive operation designed to deliver Clinton the crucial swing state.
Early voting does not begin in Ohio until October 12, so no votes have officially been castin the Buckeye state. However, inside these boxes were, what one source described as, “potentially tens of thousands of votes” for Hillary Clinton.
Christian Times Newspaper has not yet been able to obtain a photocopy of one of the ballots found inside the box, but an affiliate in Ohio passed along a replica of what was found.
It is important to note that the above replica coincides with a ballot that a Franklin County voter would cast at the polling place on Election Day, meaning the Clinton campaign’s likely goal was to slip the fake ballot boxes in with the real ballot boxes when they went to official election judges on November 8th.
Ohio, a perennial swing state in the presidential election, has been a challenge for Clinton and her Democrat counterparts in 2016. Many national Democrat groups have pulled funding from the state entirely, in order to redirect it to places in which they are doing better.
Clinton herself has spent less time in Ohio, and spent less money, in recent weeks as it has appeared that Trump will carry the crucial state.
With this find, however, it now appears that Clinton and the Democrat Party planned on stealing the state on Election Day, making any campaigning there now a waste of time.
This story is still developing, and CTN will bring you more when we have it.

Obama Administration Is Willing to Break the Law to Save Obamacare!

Daily Signal ^ | / October 04, 2016 | Paul Winfree 

President Barack Obama’s signature health care law is failing and his administration will go to seemingly any length to prop it up.

You know the famous quote from “Animal Farm” that “all animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others?” This was George Orwell’s attempt to point out the hypocrisy that many politicians preach equality, but then give favors to only a few.

Well, for the Obama administration, it turns out that the health insurance companies participating in Obamacare happen to be “more equal” than taxpayers—even to the point where the administration is willing to break the law to help them stay in Obamacare.
(Excerpt) Read more at dailysignal.com ...

Oppressed?

BrCIfzH.jpg

MASTER!

Goragu6.jpg

Laughing

Honest.jpg

Final Ride

zzi4hV7.jpg

No Leadership

MjcSZ7L.jpg

LOOK!

185631_600.jpg

Criminal Minds

ceXaHSd.jpg