Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Juanita Broaddrick to Chelsea Clinton: ‘Your parents are not good people’

The Washington Times ^ | September 28, 2016 | Jessica Chasmar 

Juanita Broaddrick, the woman who famously accused former President Bill Clinton of raping her during his 1978 gubernatorial campaign in Arkansas, took to Twitter Wednesday to address Chelsea Clinton’s downplaying of her father’s sexual misconduct.
“Here is my response to Chelsea Clinton’s statement about her father’s sexual misdeeds,” wroteMs. Broaddrick, a Donald Trump supporter who stepped back into the national spotlight recently after years of silence about the alleged rape.
“Chelsea you said you don’t remember a time in your life that your parents weren’t being attacked. There’s a very good reason for this — your parents are not good people,” she wrote in a series of tweets...
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Madness Swirls At House Judiciary Committee As Comey Attempts To Justify Hillary Innocence

zero hedge ^ | 9/28/16 | tyler durden 

Comey on Clinton email probe: ‘Don’t call us weasels’ … The normally-stoic FBI chief grew emotional as he rejected claims that the FBI was in the tank for Clinton.
James Comey appeared today before the House Judiciary Committee to answer questions about the FBI’s decision not to recommend prosecution of Hillary Clinton regarding misuse of classified emails – and in the process told members that once the politics stopped circulating, the FBI would again be seen as the institution “you know and love.”
This hyperbolic statement certainly set the tone for the larger hearing which saw Comey testifying with unusual emotionalism, adding at one point that people ought not to see those involved in the decision as “weasels.”
“You can call us wrong, but don’t call us weasels. We are not weasels,” he said. “We are honest people and….whether or not you agree with the result, this was done the way you want it to be done.”
Despite Hillary’s destruction of various phones with hammers (to mention only one issue), he spent several hours insisting, often querulously, that there was no evidence that she intended to obstruct justice or to hide evidence. His statements were mostly a repetition of already presented justifications. As they made little sense previously, they added neither clarity nor insight.
Republican congressmen – many of whom were increasingly incredulous – pressed him in startling ways. Several virtually demanded he reopen the case and others told him bluntly that “you blew it.”
“I would be in big trouble and I should be in big trouble if I did something like that,” said Rep. James Sensenbrenner (R-Wis.). “There seems to be different strokes for different folks. I think there’s a heavy hand coming from someplace else.”
Comey was confronted with new evidence
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Corrupt Lester Holt shows why Americans are sick of media

American Thinker ^ | September 28, 2016 | M. Catharine Evans 

Lester Holt's blatant bias against Donald Trump Monday night held to Hunter S. Thompson's brutal description of journalists and journalism:
Journalism is not a profession or a trade; it is a cheap catch-all for f---offs and misfits – a false doorway to the backside of life.
Holt just proved to tens of millions of Americans that absolute media power corrupts absolutely. If trust and confidence in the media have fallen to the lowest in history, as recently reported, Holt, in his total abandonment of any semblance of objectivity, has lowered both even more.
This bootlicking cog, beholden to his pro-Hillary media masters, didn't bring up Benghazi, the email scandals, the Clinton Foundation slush fund, Huma Abedin's ties to the Muslim Brotherhood, or Clinton's connections to the biggest female oppressors on the planet. With no pushback at all, Holt allowed Hillary to reference an irrelevant 1996 beauty pageant winner as an example of Trump's so-called misogyny.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Eight Years Later, Obama Has Learned Nothing About the Israeli-Palestinian Dispute

Algemeiner ^ | 9-26-16 | Mitchell Bard 

President Obama’s failure to learn anything in the last eight years about the Palestinian-Israeli dispute was evident in his final speech to the UN General Assembly. In the mere 31 words that he devoted to the subject, he laid bare his ignorance: “Israelis and Palestinians will be better off if Palestinians reject incitement and recognize the legitimacy of Israel,” he said. “But Israel recognizes that it cannot permanently occupy and settle Palestinian land.”
Sounds reasonable enough, doesn’t it? Both sides have responsibility for the conflict — except they don’t.
First, the Palestinian side of the equation was severely understated. Yes, the Palestinians must reject incitement, but they must also actively prevent terrorism. They must stop using US and EU taxpayer money to pay terrorists and their families. Yasser Arafat said he recognized Israel, but it has been clear since that 1993 letter to Yitzhak Rabin that the Palestinians do not accept the legitimacy of Israel as the national home of the Jewish people.
Furthermore, the Palestinians are unwilling to make any territorial compromises that would lead to a two-state solution. They continue to show support for the strategy whereby they would accept a Palestinian state in the West Bank and Gaza only as a first stage in the eventual liberation of all of “Palestine” — a goal reflected in Palestinian media, maps, crossword puzzles, textbooks, Fatah insignias, and every other venue one can name.
Worse, the possibility of a political solution to the conflict has been eliminated not by Israeli actions, but by the ascendancy of radical Islam — best represented by Hamas — in Palestinian society. The Islamists, who have co-opted the “secular” Palestinian leadership, will never accept the existence of a Jewish state in what they consider the Muslim heartland, nor will they tolerate a situation whereby Jews “rule” over Muslims.
Obama still fails to see these truths. In fact, he reinforces the Palestinians’ bad behavior by continuing to make excuses for them and holding Mahmoud Abbas out as a partner for peace even though the Palestinian “president” has rejected Obama’s calls for negotiations for nearly eight years. In fact, there is no better example of how weak the US has become under Obama than the fact that a pipsqueak like Abbas, who is totally dependent on international aid for his survival, has repeatedly defied Obama by refusing to negotiate and going around the president and the Israelis to the UN in search of international sanctions to impose Palestinian terms on Israel.
President Obama also continues to make the sophistic comparison between Palestinian terrorism and Jewish settlements. He seriously believes that Jews establishing homes on land that has been part of Jewish history for thousands of years is equivalent to Palestinians murdering Jews. Even as rockets are falling on Israel, bombs are exploding, and people are being shot, stabbed, and run over, Obama finds fault only with Israel.
In fact, with all the violence in the Middle East, and now in the United States, it is mind-boggling that the White House and State Department remain obsessed with publicly chastising Israel over its housing policies.
Public opinion on the further development of West Bank communities is very controversial in Israel; however, in the absence of any Palestinian peace initiative, opponents have little ground to stand on. Left-wing critics in the US and Israel whine about the failure of the political system to produce a government that supports their minority views, ignoring the reality that the failure of prior peace efforts are responsible for the shift of Israeli voters to the right.
More than 20 years have passed since the Oslo agreement raised hopes for an end to the conflict. Yet Palestinian violence never ceased and the territorial compromises Israel made did not lead to pace. When Israel completely withdrew settlers and soldiers from Gaza and gave the Palestinians an opportunity to start to build the infrastructure of a state, they demonstrated the Israeli right was correct in predicting that the Palestinians would pocket any concessions, seek more without any reciprocity, and escalate terror. If the “occupation” ended tomorrow, the conflict would continue and Israelis would be in more serious danger because the terrorists would be unencumbered, and have the capability to threaten Israel’s airports, population centers, industrial heartland, and capital.
A case can be made against the expansion of settlements; for example, that it hurts Israel’s position internationally; that it diverts military resources away from more critical threats; that it is costly at a time when money might be better spent on domestic needs; that it makes a political solution — with the big caveat that the Palestinians must someday want one — more difficult; and that it puts Israel in a conundrum whereby it will be increasingly difficult to remain a Jewish and democratic state as the proportion of the Palestinian population becomes a significant minority, if not the majority, between the Mediterranean and the Jordan River.
Still, history cannot be ignored. No settlements existed prior to 1967 and there was no peace. The Palestinians were unwilling to make peace even when settlers numbered in the thousands. They were unwilling to stop the violence when Israel evacuated Gaza. Today, with a settler population of 350,000, the Palestinians can denounce Israel all they want, but they have only themselves to blame. Their chance for statehood will continue to dissipate the longer they refuse to negotiate and compromise. Today, it would be difficult, if not impossible, to relocate 50,000 or more Jews from outlying settlements if Palestinians agreed to a two-state solution. When the number of settlers grows, as expected, to 500,000 over the next several years, territorial compromise will probably be impossible.
There’s little hope for Obama to figure this out in his last months, and we can only hope he does not make the situation worse — as he has in Syria, Iraq, Afghanistan and Libya. It would be wiser for him to focus on those debacles and the continued rise of radical Islam. I’m not terribly optimistic given the candidates, but at least there is hope that the next president will have a better grasp of the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, and not repeat the mistakes of the last eight years.

Chelsea Clinton: Father’s infidelity talk just 'a distraction’!

Politico ^ | 9/27/2016 | Cristiano Lima 

Chelsea Clinton is in no rush to thank Donald Trump for not mentioning Bill Clinton’s infidelity during Monday night’s presidential debate.
The daughter of Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton pushed back against Trump’s claim that he was proud to not have resurfaced the former president’s past out of “respect” for her in an interview with Cosmopolitan on Tuesday, saying the Republican candidate is only seeking to sidestep real issues.
“It’s a distraction from his inability to talk about what’s actually at stake in this election and to offer concrete, comprehensive proposals about the economy, or our public school system, or debt-free college, or keeping our country safe and Americans safe here at home and around the world,” she said.
Chelsea, a friend of Trump’s daughter Ivanka, went on to attack Trump for his repeated attacks against women and minority groups, saying those are “far more troubling than whatever his most recent screed against my mom or my family [is].”
"What I find most troubling by far," she said, “are Trump’s continued, relentless attacks on whole swaths of our country and even our global community: women, Muslims, Americans with disabilities, [and] a Gold Star family.”
Read more: Follow us: @politico on Twitter | Politico on Facebook
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

EXCLUSIVE: Hillary Failed To Take Highest Security Training At State Dept In 2009!

Daily Caller ^ | September 27, 2016 | RICHARD POLLOCK 

Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton failed to complete the highest level of security training mandated by the Department of State for the proper handling of the government’s most secret documents when she entered the department in 2009, according to documents obtained by The Daily Caller News Foundation under the Freedom of Information Act.

The State Department released 46 pages of previously unseen documents Tuesday under a Sept. 20, 2016, order issued by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Leon.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Fact-Checking Lester Holt

WSJ Editorial
We told you Tuesday that Donald Trump was right when he pushed back on debate moderator Lester Holt over “stop and frisk” policing. But the story deserves a more complete explanation, not least because the media are distorting the record.
Mr. Trump invoked stop and frisk as a way to “take the gun away from criminals” in high-crime areas and protect the innocent. That provoked Mr. Holt, who said that “stop and frisk was ruled unconstitutional in New York.” Mr. Trump then noted that the ruling in the case came from a “very against police judge” who later had the case taken away from her. Mrs. Clinton then echoed Mr. Holt.
Here’s what really happened. The federal judge in the stop-and-frisk case was Shira Scheindlin, a notorious police critic whose behavior got her taken off the case by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. The appellate court put it this way:
“Upon review of the record in these cases, we conclude that the District Judge ran afoul of the Code of Conduct for United States Judges . . . and that the appearance of impartiality surrounding this litigation was compromised by the District Judge’s improper application of the Court’s ‘related case rule’ . . . and by a series of media interviews and public statements purporting to respond publicly to criticism of the District Court.”
The court then remanded the case to another judge who would not present an appearance of bias against the police. In a follow-up opinion, the appellate judges cited a New Yorker interview with Judge Scheindlin that included a quote from a former law clerk saying “what you have to remember about the judge is that she thinks cops lie.”
This is an extraordinary rebuke by a higher court and raises doubts that the merits of her ruling would have held up on appeal. As Rudolph Giuliani makes clear nearby, the judge’s ruling of unconstitutionality applied only to stop and frisk as it was practiced in New York at the time. Such police search tactics have long been upheld by higher courts.
In the end, the clock ran out on Mayor Mike Bloomberg, and new Mayor Bill de Blasio chose not to appeal. We rate Mr. Trump’s claim true and unfairly second-guessed by a moderator who didn’t give the viewing public all the facts.

Two thirds of voters say they think Hillary is secretly in poor health!

Daily Mail UK ^ | September 27, 2016 | Chris Summers 

Two thirds of voters say they think Hillary is secretly in poor health despite her efforts to shrug off pneumonia concerns
AP-GfK poll found 51 per cent of voters have confidence in Trump's health But only 36 per cent feel Hillary Clinton is well enough to be president She collapsed at a 9/11 memorial service and spent several days at home Her doctor later said she had pneumonia, raising fears about her health At the first presidential debate she pointed out she had visited 112 nations On Tuesday she was seen coughing while speaking to press on her plane Two-thirds of American voters are worried about Hillary Clinton's health and agree with Donald Trump's suggestions that she has a lack of 'stamina,' a new poll suggests.
An Associated Press-GfK poll found that voters, especially men, have more confidence in Trump's health than Clinton's.
The result comes despite the Clinton campaign's attempts to calm the public fears that increased after she was diagnosed with pneumonia and had a public collapse on Sept. 11.
She has released about the same amount of medical information as Trump, and independent doctors who have looked at the available data say both candidates seem fine. But Wednesday's survey shows evidence of the political points Trump scored after her much-publicized pneumonia, which caused her to drop out of the campaign for several days after her collapse at a 9/11 memorial service in New York.
The AP-GfK poll found 51 per cent of voters were very or extremely confident that the 70-year-old Trump is healthy enough to be president.
But only 36 per cent had the same confidence in the health of Hillary, who turns 69 a few days before the November 8 election.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Obama ‘Conducting Conversations’ to Send More Money to Iran!

Breitbart ^ | September 27, 2016 | Edwin Mora 

The president of Iran, state-sponsor of terrorism, has said he is expecting more money from the United States in addition to the $1.7 billion in cash that President Barack Obama has already paid the Shiite Islamic Republic as part of his nuclear deal.

“There are still considerable sums of money in the United States that belong to our nation. And we’re currently conducting conversations and various dialogues in order to return this money to Iran. Some things that we could not agree upon, there are ways to address those in the international court system,” Shiite Iran’s President Hassan Rouhani told NBC News’s Chuck Todd in an exclusive interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Charlotte negro rioters don’t care if shooting was justified!

The National Post ^ | September 26, 2016 | Rich Lowry 

The Charlotte negro rioters didn’t know whether the controversial police shooting of Keith Scott was justified, and didn’t care.

They worked their mayhem — trashing businesses and injuring cops, with one protester killed in the disorder — before anything meaningful could be ascertained about the case except that the cops said Scott had a gun and his family said he didn’t.

Charlotte is the latest episode in the evidence-free Black Lives Matter movement that periodically erupts in violence after officer-involved shootings. The movement is beholden to a narrative of systematic police racism to which every case is made to conform, regardless of the facts or logic.

It doesn’t matter if the police officer is an African-American with an unblemished record and numerous character witnesses. This describes Brentley Vinson, the officer who fatally shot Keith Scott....

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Still Report #1218 - UPI Poll - Trump Takes Leads in Electoral College (333 Trump-205 Clinton)

Still Report ^ | 9/27/2016 | Bill Still 

For the first time this year, a major polling operation now says that Donald Trump has overtaken Hillary Clinton in the only race that matters – the Electoral College race.
The poll was conducted between Sept. 12 and 25th. It tracks 250 likely voters in each state every week. Results are tabulated every two weeks. Although the UPI’s national poll shows Clinton with a slight lead of 2/3rds of one percent, Trump tromps the ailing former Secretary of State by an Electoral College margin of 292 to 246 with 270 needed for victory. What’s changed? Trump is now leading in Florida by 1.8%, Iowa by 2%, North Carolina by 2.5%, and Ohio by 1%. But the two new surprises into the Trump camp are Pennsylvania where Trump now leads by 1.3% and Virginia where Trump leads by a whopping 3.4% margin.
Among the swing states, Clinton is ahead in Colorado (3.5%), Michigan (4.4%), Minnesota (4%), Nevada (0.5%), New Hampshire (0.9%) and Wisconsin (3.4%)...
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Media Bias is Alive and Well at the Presidential Debate

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/27/16 | Chip McLean 

Perhaps Donald Trump should coin a phrase, “doing the jobs that the American press won’t do.”

The first presidential debate between Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton has come and gone. So who won?

That’s a harder question to answer than “who lost?”

The loser in this case was journalistic integrity.

The “performance” by so-called moderator Lester Holt could be likened to that of the interfering third party in a pro wrestling event. Anytime Trump was pounding away on Hillary, Lester Holt was there to jump in the ring and hit Trump over the head with a metaphorical chair or other foreign object. Vince McMahon couldn’t have scripted a better two on one match – especially as this added the plot-twister of the referee being the one who interfered.

Earth to Democrats/media: All smart people try to minimize their tax liability

Canada Free Press ^ | 09/27/16 | Dan Calabrese 

Preferably to zero. You’re a fool if you don’t.

One of the reasons I hate politics is that political people exist in a world completely divorced from the reality in which normal people live. In the fantasy world of political people, the most wonderful and high-minded thing you can do is fork over an enormous chunk of your wealth to the federal government, because this is how you keep everyone else living, breathing, fat and happy.

And in this fantasy world, anyone who would not want to do this is a greedy pig, beneath contempt and unworthy of a place in polite society.

Voting For Hillary Clinton Equals Accelerating Muslim Killings Of Americans

US Defense Watch ^ | September 27, 2016 | Frosty Wooldridge 

“Islam isn’t in America to be equal to any faith, but to become dominant. The Qur’an should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth.” Omar Ahmed, director of Council on American Islamic Relations.
By reading that statement by one of the BIG Muslim leaders for CAIR in America, you face an uneasy feeling he means business. And, as his Muslim immigrant friends grow in number, he enjoys greater power to institute his intentions onto the American people.
Islam Is All About Power Through Numbers
One of those American citizens, presidential candidate Hillary Clinton promises to import 110,000 Syrian refugees as soon as she reaches the White House. If the American people vote her into office, you can expect Muslim violence to escalate with the added numbers of refugees. Example: look at Europe’s bombings, violence, rapes and riots from Muslim immigrants.
On Saturday, September 24, 2016, in a Washington State mall, Turkish immigrant Arcan Cetin stabbed 10 and gunned down 5 people in yet another Muslim terrorist attack on American citizens.
Last week, September 20, 2016, in St. Cloud, Minnesota, a 20-year-old Muslim immigrant, Dahir Ahmed Adan, stabbed ten Americans in a shopping mall before being shot dead by a policeman.
Please realize this fact: Muslims follow the Quran. That book proves itself a terrorist’s handbook for violence. It stands against everything in our U.S. Constitution. It brooks no other laws. Its followers intend to conquer every country they invade. When someone like Cetin, Adan or the pressure cooker bomber in New York, 28-year-old Ahmad Khan Rahami—grow up reading the Quran, they follow its single mandate: “Convert or kill all non-believers.”
ABC anchor David Muir, Wednesday, September 14, 2016, reported that Barack Obama successfully imported 11,000 Syrian refugees into America this year. He expects to import a total of 110,000 in 2017 with Hillary’s election to the White House.
This fact remains: you cannot ‘vet’ the mind of a Muslim.
“Diversity within a nation destroys unity and leads to civil wars,” said social scientist Garret Hardin. “Immigration, a benefit during the youth of a nation, can act as a disease in its mature state. Too much internal diversity in large nations has led to violence and disintegration. We are now in the process of destabilizing our own country. The magic words of destabilizers are ‘diversity’ and ‘multiculturalism’.”
The Koran promotes violence in virtually every chapter of the book: Sura 5, verse 84 states: “Strongest among men in enmity to the believers will thou find the Jews and Pagans (Christians). Fight and slay the Pagans wherever you find them, in every stratagem of war. Instill terror in the hearts of unbelievers. Cut off their heads and cut off their tips of their fingers.”
We Americans enjoy a clear mandate in this coming election in November 2016 for the presidency. If you want more Muslims and their violence and ultimately, their subverting our laws and Constitution—vote for Hillary Clinton. Her 20-year personal assistant, Muslim Huma Abedin, works fervently for Sharia Law in America. Hillary WILL import 110,000 Muslims in her first year alone. She expects to give amnesty to as high as 31 million illegal aliens. If she gains power, you will see your community overrun by Muslims, illegal aliens, crime, violence and total usurpation of your American culture.
By voting for Trump, you at least give our country a chance to survive this immigration invasion. Can you imagine another 100,000,000 (million) more immigrants in the next 30 years? Those immigrants will undermine and destroy the fabric, culture, language and ethos of America. They will overwhelm our water, energy and resources. They will turn this country into a third world hellhole. Trump will stop the refugee flooding, stop illegal aliens, deport illegal aliens already here by enforcing our current employment laws—and, he will build a wall to stop further influx not only of illegal migrants, but the drugs that tear up every community in our country. Trump will renegotiate trade laws in our favor instead of China’s. He’ll bring back jobs for African-Americans, Hispanic-Americans and all Americans, especially our teens for summer jobs—by cutting off the flow of immigrants.
‪The Obama Immigration Policy Timeline Wrecking Ball: Summary
After watching that video, you realize that you, your family and community stand in the cross-hairs of history. Vote for your country, for your community and for your family. Vote Donald J. Trump for president of the United States.

The Nuclear Option: Trump Was Very Good — And Will Be Even Better ^ | 27 Sep 2016 | CHARLES HURT 

Monday night’s debate here was a tremendous victory for Donald Trump, but his performance left plenty of room for improvement.

Big picture: Polls show support for Hillary Clinton is collapsing, and she desperately needed to stanch the bleeding. She did nothing during the debate to change the trajectory of those increasingly bleak polls. SIGN UP FOR OUR NEWSLETTER
With states like Pennsylvania and Colorado in play this week, we could be talking about states like Michigan and Wisconsin in play next week. That would put the race away early for Mr. Trump.
Mrs. Clinton’s primary charge against Mr. Trump is that he lacks the “temperament” to be president. In an easy glide Monday night, Mr. Trump demonstrated otherwise.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Donald Trump Could Have a ‘Ronald Reagan 1980 Kind of Blowout’! ^ | 27 Sep 2016 | John Hayward 

Ed Cox, chairman of the New York Republican State Committee and son-in-law of late President Richard Nixon, offered his review of Monday night’s presidential debate on Tuesday’s Breitbart News Daily. “I thought that Donald Trump really presented a broad vision for what he wanted, which is what a president has to do,” Cox told SiriusXM host Alex Marlow.
As for Hillary Clinton, he said she offered a “very detailed, lots of words, very lawyerly kind of brief, but you fall asleep when you listen to that.”
Cox said:
When Donald Trump spoke, you really watch it because he’s going to say something significant, and he did. He’s a real leader, and that’s what came across. She’s not. He’s gotten there on his own. He has amazing political ability, so he couldn’t have gotten to where he is with, really, not raising any funds, no organization – and that ability showed itself on that stage.
“He’s a leader, and he has the ability to make decisions like a leader should make them. I’ve been with him when he has done that, and he knows how to do it,” he continued. “She’s always ridden on someone else’s coattails, either her husband’s, or now on Barack Obama’s, so she comes across as a good adviser who’s got a brief, but not as a leader.”
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Because her lips were moving: Why Hillary lost the debate!

The Hill ^ | September 27, 2016 | Kenneth R. Timmerman, contributor 

There was a popular saying among intelligence officers during the Iran-contra affair: How do you know an Iranian is lying? Because his lips are moving.
It was applied to Manucher Ghorbanifar, the mercurial intermediary; and to his boss, the so-called “moderate” Parliament speaker, Akbar Hashemi-Rafsanjani, who told Ghorbanifar he wanted to make a deal with America all the while he helped organize hostage-takings and terrorist attacks against Americans.
Hillary’s debate performance reminded me of that saying, because every time she opened her mouth to lay out her opposition research on Donald Trump, she lied or misrepresented the truth to such an extent it became unrecognizable.
American voters aren’t quite as stupid as Clinton (or the “insiders” at Politico) think, and as a slew of after-event polls showed, they weren’t falling for her lies about Trump, her phony statistics, or her breath-taking claim that life in America’s inner-cities has improved over the past twenty years. Or that her plan to raise taxes on the middle class and businesses will help the middle class and create jobs.
They recognized her slick talking points for what they were: carefully crafted attacks, scripted by pollsters and political consultants, aimed at appealing to specific demographics she felt were “must win” for her flailing and divisive campaign.
Need to increase her share of the “women’s vote?” Why, call Trump a sexist because of his comments about Rosie O’Donnell’s pig-like appearance and behavior. (As Trump acknowledged, most people who have watched Rosie O’Donnell agree with him).
Need to increase her share of the “black vote?” Why, call out Trump for inventing “the racist lie that our first black president was not an American.”
Trump garnered nation-wide attention for being the only Republican who persisted in demanding that Obama release his long-form birth certificate to put the “birther racist lie” (Clinton's term) to rest. Unlike Clinton — who launched the “birther” movement during her 2008 primary campaign against Obama then conveniently forgot about it after Obama beat her — Trump succeeded.
Need to get the “union vote?” Why, claim without batting an eyelash that you believe in “smart, fair trade deals” when Clinton called the Trans Pacific Partnerships the “gold standard of trade deals” and has never called for modifying NAFTA which her husband signed into law, to correct its enormous flaws. (Even the normally left-wing PolitiFact concluded in its ‘Truth-o-meter:’ “Trump is right, Clinton flip-flopped on TPP.”)
Trump is a boxer, not a politician. And by jabbing at his opponents, countering their every blow, he put away sixteen skilled politicians in the GOP primary. And he put away Clinton last night.
Clinton clearly thought she could deflect his jabs and land a knock-out punch near the end, by countering Trump’s critique of the failed Iran deal she helped to craft as secretary of state.
In a set piece clearly written ahead of time by consultants, she pretended to address America’s friends and allies abroad as a statesman, speaking on behalf of her country. “I know this [i.e. Trump’s] campaign has caused some questioning and some worries with many leaders around the globe. I know. I’ve talked with a number of them. But I want to, on behalf of myself and I think on the behalf of a majority of the American people, say that our word is good.”
Sounds great. I’m sure her consultants told her (and keep telling her now), it was a “presidential” moment.
But once again, Trump the boxer hit back. “All of the things she is talking about could have been taken care of in the last ten years when she had power. And if she comes to power, she won’t take care of them.”
And again: “Hillary, she’s got experience, but it’s bad experience … This country can’t afford to have another four years of this bad experience.”
So, programmatic politician, versus the boxer. The emperor in her birthday suit of lies, versus the boy in the street proclaiming her nakedness.
Anyone who was expecting Donald Trump to lay out programs and statistics and proposals on Monday night understands nothing about this candidate, or about the movement he incarnates.
That would have been to behave as a traditional politician — like Clinton. Instead, Trump remained Trump and spoke the truth. And because he remains a truth-teller, he will win big in November. The American people are fed up with the politicians lies.

Donald J. Trump for President Celebrates Massive $18 Million Haul After Debate Win!

Donald J Trump ^ | September 27, 2016 

NEW YORK, NY – Less than 24 hours after winning last night’s debate, the Donald J. Trump Campaign (in conjunction with the RNC) has officially brought in a massive fundraising haul of $18 million, signaling momentum of historic proportions.
“As a result of Donald Trump’s huge debate win last night, we had a massive fundraising day bringing in more than $18 million. This is a movement to Make America Great Again. We are grateful for the support of millions of Americans across the country. With this kind of energy and generous support behind us, we are going to have President Donald J. Trump in the White House,” Steven Mnuchin, Finance Chairman, Donald J. Trump for President.
"The National Call Day was a tremendous success. Many donors came on board as Donald J. Trump rolls on to victory," Lew Eisenberg, Finance Chairman, Trump Victory.
Leading Team Trump’s national fundraising push was:
Team YUUUGE: Lew Eisenberg, Cara Mason, Woody Johnson, Carie Bock and Allison Macintosh
Team MAGA: Steven Mnuchin, Elliott Broidy, Ray Washburne, Brandi Marks and Amanda Ober
Team IRREDEEMABLES: Michael Cohen, Anthony Scaramucci and Lindsey Reynolds
Team DEPLORABLES: Roy Bailey, Gentry Beach, Tommy Hicks, Alden Wood, Rachel Kelley and Mallory Hunter
Team Trump Digital Fundraising: Brad Parscale
Team Trump: Governor Mike Pence, Chairman Reince Priebus, Donald Trump Jr., Eric Trump, Ivanka Trump and Eli Miller
The Donald J. Trump for President campaign is a national grassroots movement representing the desire to break up Washington’s rigged system and Make America Great Again.

WikiLeaks CONFIRMS Hillary Sold Weapons to ISIS… Then Drops Another Bomb

Political Insider ^ 

Julian Assange, the founder of WikiLeaks, is a controversial character.

But there’s no denying the emails he has picked up from inside the Democrat Party are real, and he’s willing to expose Hillary Clinton.
Now, he’s announcing that Hillary Clinton and her State Department were actively arming Islamic jihadists, which includes the Islamic State (ISIS) in Syria.

Clinton has repeatedly denied these claims, including during multiple statements while under oath in front of the United States Senate.

(Excerpt) Read more at ...

WHOA! Medical Expert Watching Debate Exposes ANOTHER Telltale Sign Hillary Likely Has PARKINSON’S

100 Percent Fed Up ^ | 9/27/2016 

How many more symptoms need to be uncovered before Hillary comes clean? Why would anyone want to take on the position of Commander In Chief if they aren’t even well enough to walk without assistance?

In the tunnel to Clinton’s vehicle after the debate, Secret Service used pointer flash lights pointing at the ground in front of Clinton’s feet (watch carefully) in order to guide Hillary through the tunnel to/into her vehicle.
Hillary entered the opposite (hidden side) of vehicle so the camera cannot see her entry.

Pointer or Laser lights are used for Parkinson’s patients.
Dr. Ted Noel discussed pointers used for Parkinson’s patients in a recent video:
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Trump Comes Out On Top! Billionaire Pulls Ahead In Electoral College Poll

Radar Online ^ | September 27, 2016 | Staff 

The newly released poll reveals Hillary Clinton could lose the presidency.

Donald Trump is riding high after Monday night’s debate performance! A new UPI/CVoter’s state tracking poll released the day after the big event shows that Trump could amass enough votes to win the presidency.
According to UPI current numbers suggest that Trump would earn “292 votes and Clinton would get 246 with 270 needed to secure the oval office.”
But Trump’s lead still remains narrow. “If the battleground states are not counted, the race would be tied 191-191,” UPI reported.
Florida is one of the key swing states that could shift the election in Clinton’s favor. The state holds 29 electoral votes. If Clinton won those, she could win the election 275-263.
Clinton’s biggest leads against Trump are currently in the District of Columbia and Hawaii, while Trump’s largest leads are in Utah and Wyoming.
This poll was conducted from September 12-September 25, so the effects from last night’s fiery presidential debate have yet to be seen.

Post Debate Poll: Clinton Won on Performance, Trump Won Votes

People's Pundit Daily ^ | September 27, 2016 | Staff 

A Post Debate Poll conducted after the presidential showdown at Hofstra University finds Hillary Clinton put on the best performance, but Donald Trump won votes. While voters 47% to 44% think that Mrs. Clinton “won the first presidential debate,” Mr. Trump won over undecided voters who changed their mind by nearly a 3 to 1 margin.
Nine percent (9%) were undecided on the question of who won the debate.
Among those who were undecided (5%) before the debate, 31% changed their mind and now say they’ll support the New York businessman. By comparison, only 11% of previously undecided voters said they will now vote for the former secretary of state.
The results were noteworthy, considering more voters than not thought Mrs. Clinton gave a better debate performance. Authenticity, honesty and trustworthiness played and will continue to play a big role in voters’ preferences ahead of November.
“Voters are looking for Donald Trump to basically give them permission to vote for him, fair or not,” says PPD’s senior analyst Richard Baris. “If he improves in the next two debates, which he did during the primary, things could get really ugly really fast for Hillary Clinton.”
Regarding the debate, which most mainstream pundits gave to Mrs. Clinton, most voters expected her to be polished on stage. But they were watching to see if Mr. Trump could pass the presidential bar.
“He was restrained, He came off much more natural,” said Shaun Ellis, an independent voter from Hopington, New Hampshire. “Hillary looked weak on the economy,” adding he decided “we need new blood.”
Of course, not everyone agreed he met that bar. The good news for Mr. Trump and his supporters: the vast majority of those who don’t think he met that threshold are Democratic partisans.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

 I hope Trump pays nothing in taxes.
9/26/16 | AzJoe 

I hope Trump pays little or nothing in taxes. In fact, I wish the federal government would take less from him than they already do.

The money Trump save on taxes he then uses to create businesses that employ 10s of thousands of workers. These workers all pay federal taxes and will continue to pay taxes far, far,...FAR in excess of any money the federal government would have confiscated from Trump.

Trump may or may not pay taxes, but he most certainly creates significant tax revenues.

What would be smart is for the federal government to invest in Trump, allow him to keep more of what he earns & create even more jobs....instead of spending millions on studying cow flatulence, resettling terrorists into the United States, sending money to Islamic regimes and dictatorships and providing sex change operations for federal prisoners.


Frontpage Mag ^ | September 28, 2016 | Matthew Vadum 

Leaked document reveals the staggering breadth of domestic terrorist activity -- and the administration's cover-up!

The Obama administration has been concealing the staggering breadth of terrorist activity in the United States – quantified as close to 8,000 terrorist encounters in a recent year -- a leaked government report suggests.
There are disturbing parallels between the Obama administration’s ongoing cover-up of the true extent of terrorist operations in the U.S. and its election season cover-up four years ago of the real causes of the Benghazi, Libya terrorist attack on Sept. 11, 2012.
Remember that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton publicly lied four years ago, saying the Benghazi attack was carried out by an angry mob of Muslims that had been inflamed by an obscure anti-Islam video on YouTube. It has since been established that Clinton advised her daughter Chelsea by email on the very night of the assault that cost four American lives that Muslim terrorists from an al-Qaeda-like group were the actual perpetrators.
The Obama administration participated in the ruse because Election Day 2012 was only weeks away at the time and the White House didn’t want information getting out that countered the official narrative that al-Qaeda was on the run and that Obama’s policies were decimating the nation’s terrorist enemies.
The lie got Obama past the finish line in 2012, so it’s not hard to conclude that he is following the same playbook right now to make it seem like the homeland is safe and secure on his watch. If the public knew that terrorists were running wild all across the fruited plain it might be difficult for Obama to carry Clinton, his preferred would-be successor and a fellow radical left-wing Alinskyite, into the winner’s circle this Nov. 8.
This is because word of fresh Obama administration misconduct or incompetence imperiling national security and putting innocent Americans at risk could hurt Clinton, a former member of his cabinet and therefore the candidate of the status quo, at the polls.
The government report itself is chilling.
“Known or Suspected Terrorist (KST) Encounters,” a Terrorist Screening Center (TSC) document obtained by Brandon Darby, editor-in-chief of Breitbart Texas, states that there were an astounding 7,712 encounters between terrorists and law enforcement officials from July 20, 2015 through July 20, 2016. The report is labeled, “UNCLASSIFIED/LAW ENFORCEMENT SENSITIVE.”
The TSC maintains the U.S. government’s consolidated Terrorist Watchlist, which is a single database of identifying information about, in the words of the Justice Department, those “known or reasonably suspected of being involved in terrorist activity.” The multi-agency organization is administered by the FBI and provides operational support for federal, state, local, and foreign governments.
The report breaks down encounters by category but only for the state of Arizona. The sixth page of the TSC report contains a pie chart showing that the majority of encounters in Arizona were with known or suspected Islamic terrorists, both Sunni and Shi’a. There were 89 encounters with Sunni Muslims and 56 with Shi’a Muslims. Seventy were categorized as “Other International Terrorist Groups or Affiliates,” and 52 as “Domestic Terrorism.”
Many of those terrorist encounters took place near the nation’s southern border. Others happened at ports-of-entry, or in-between, suggesting that suspected terrorists used stealth to enter U.S. territory. The most affected states were the border states of California, Michigan, New York, and Texas, along with Florida, Illinois, and the District of Columbia.
The news comes as communities in Minnesota, New York, and Washington State are reeling from recent Islamic terrorist attacks.
There have been 92 Muslim terrorist plots in the U.S. since Sept. 11, 2001. The overwhelming majority of those plots took place during Barack Obama’s presidency.
Here is where the figure of 92 comes from: the Heritage Foundation hasn’t updated its list of all the post-9/11 Muslim terrorist plots in the U.S. since a July 2 terrorist event, but as of that date the figure was 89. Of those 89, only 27 took place during George W. Bush’s presidency.
Number 90 since Sept. 11, 2001 would be the Sept. 17 bombing in New York’s Chelsea neighborhood allegedly carried out by Ahmad Khan Rahami. Number 91 took place the same day at Crossroads Mall, in St. Cloud, Minnesota when Dahir Adan stabbed nine people. Number 92 was the Sept. 23 Cascade Mall shooting spree in Burlington, Washington allegedly carried out by Arcan Cetin.
News of the TSC report also came as FBI Director James Comey testified the U.S. will become a victim of its own counter-terrorism success in coming years as Islamic State (a.k.a. ISIS, ISIL, Daesh) loses control of its territory in Syria and Iraq. He told the Senate Homeland Security Committee on Tuesday that the anticipated exodus of fighters will be larger than that which flowed out of post-war Afghanistan in the 1980s.
"The so-called caliphate will be crushed. The challenge will be: through the fingers of that crush are going to come hundreds of very, very dangerous people," Comey said, repeating a similar warning he offered in July.
Committee Chairman Sen. Ron Johnson (R-Wis.), who is locked in a tough reelection battle with former Sen. Russ Feingold (D), took Comey’s testimony with a grain of salt.
He acknowledged that the territory held by Islamic State has shrunk, but said efforts against it have been so slow that the terrorist group that claims to be an Islamic caliphate is reconstituting elsewhere.
"We haven’t reduced their capability. The diaspora has already begun," Johnson said. "We're poking the hive. We've done some damage to it but the killer bees are leaving the hive. They’re setting up new hives."
Comey said Islamic State fighters “will not all die on the battlefield in Syria and Iraq. There will be a terrorist diaspora sometime in the next two to five years like we've never seen before."
"We must prepare ourselves and our allies particularly in western Europe to confront that threat because when ISIL is reduced to an insurgency and those killers flow out they will try to come to western Europe and try to come here to kill innocent people," he said.
Of course Comey is assuming America’s war against Islamic terrorism – as modest as it may be – will continue in coming years.
That is not a reasonable assumption.

ANALYSIS: @HillaryClinton’s #AliciaMachado Definitely Had Anchor Baby With Mexican Drug Kingpin

GotNews ^ | 9/27/16 | Charles Johnson 

GotNews has already exposed Hillary Clinton’s Alicia Machado as a lying attempted murderess and porn star with a Mexican drug kingpin’s anchor baby.
The Mexican Attorney General and GotNews’ unnamed federal law enforcement source both agree that Machado’s baby daddy is locked-up drug trafficker Gerardo Alvarez-Velazquez.
Alicia Machado herself has variously claimed it’s her “best friend” Rafael Hernandez Linares and that “she’s kept quite about his identity because he isn’t involved in the entertainment world and she’d like to respect his privacy.”
Does Alicia Machado’s daughter Dinorah look like she could be the drug kingpin’s kid? Yep.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Post Debate Surge:Florida Rally, Thousands Turned Away

Breitbart ^ | 9-27-2016 | Jen Lawrence & Justin Stockman 

In his first public appearance after the Presidential debate at Hofstra University on Monday, Donald Trump was welcomed by tens of thousands of enthusiastic supporters to a Florida airplane hanger.

Trump’s supporters waited in long lines in the rain and lightning for hours to cheer on Trump. Even after the hanger had filled up, it took more than six minutes to video the whole line.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Undecided Voters Seemed To Like Trump's Debate Pitch ^ | September 28, 2016 | Daniel Greenfield 

The media hated Trump's pitch. But then it was going to hate anything he said. Among undecideds, particularly those who just watched it unprompted, it seemed to resonate.

Letosky entered the evening undecided in a town that is heavily Democratic in registration. Her sister and father are on opposite sides of the political aisle. Donald “Trump had the upper hand this evening,” she said, citing his command of the back-and-forth between him and Hillary Clinton.
Reed, 35, is a registered Democrat and small businessman. “By the end of the debate, Clinton never said a thing to persuade me that she had anything to offer me or my family or my community,” he said, sitting at the same bar that has boasted local icons as regulars, such as the late Fred Rogers, and Arnold Palmer, who had his own stash of PM Whiskey hidden behind newer bottles of whiskey for his regular visits.
“Have to say Trump had the edge this evening, he came out swinging but also talked about specifics on jobs and the economy,” Reed said.
Reed said Clinton came across as either smug or as though she was reading her résumé, adding there was nothing on her résumé that touched on his life. “I am a small businessman, a farmer, come from a long line of farmers and coal miners. The policies she talked about tonight ultimately either hurt me or ignore me,” he said.
“I’ve been a Democrat all of my life, but when Clinton mentions her husband and the jobs he brought to the country in the ’90s, it’s not a fair assessment. She is no moderate Democrat the way he was, her policies would not bring back jobs,” said Nathan Nemick.
It burns Nemick when Clinton references her husband, like she did in the debate on trade and jobs. “She is nothing like him,” he said of the Democrat he admired in his youth.
The McClatchy lineup isn't too favorable to Trump, but it's Hillary who loses big.
Kae Roberts and Jay Eardly were leaning toward Hillary Clinton before Monday night’s debate.
By the end, they had both pulled away.
John Kokos and Hank Federal were undecided going in, potential Clinton backers.
By the end, they’d ruled her out.
Indeed, while polls found that Clinton had won the first general-election debate with Donald Trump on Monday, she may not have won actual votes. And she may even have lost some, at least in the battleground state of North Carolina.
In a focus group of 21 voters from around Charlotte conducted by McClatchy and The Charlotte Observer, four who had been up for grabs before the debate had moved away from her by the end.
The media is calling it a win, but as usual with Hillary, it's not a win if you don't appeal to anyone.

Attack, Don't Defend,Should Be Debate Strategy ^ | September 28, 2016 | Daniel Greenfield 

The first debate was a disgrace. NBC's moderator, Lester Holt, hurled attack after attack at Trump. Not only was the entire debate defined by a left-wing perspective, but Holt repeatedly threw character attacks at Trump and none at Hillary. Trump performed best when he turned those attacks around, whether on emails or on Libya. That should be the strategy for future debates.

Trump would be well advised not to waste time defending himself from attacks about his past. The only thing this accomplishes is to give the scandal airtime while making him appear defensive.
Since the moderators are likely to follow Holt's lead and refuse to discuss any of Hillary's many issues, the only way to incorporate them into the debate is to bring them up. Any attacks on Trump should be immediately redirected to questions about Hillary. This will make them an issue. Focusing on them will leave a biased moderator working to help Hillary with only two options. Either he can escalate the confrontation with Trump or pivot to actually discussing the issue out of the conviction that Hillary will do better in a discussion of more serious topics.
What the moderators cannot be allowed to do is conduct another one-sided inquisition as Lester Holt did last night.
Mainstream media moderators should never have been allowed to helm the debates. But presumably that is not about to change for this series of debates. (Though it could and ought to.) But moderators should be forced to choose between discussing Hillary's scandals and discussing issues. What they cannot be allowed to do is to repeat Holt's performance of allowing Hillary to discuss issues and Trump's scandals... and then insisting on limiting Trump to discussions of his scandals.
Romney made the mistake of trying to play the game. And he lost. Trump should not make the same mistake.

Why Yellen may quit if Trump wins

Market Watch | Sept 27, 2016 12:33 p.m. ET | Steve Goldstein 

Even with two years remaining in her term, Federal Reserve Chairwoman Janet Yellen may quit if Donald Trump is elected president, an economist argued on Tuesday.
Paul Ashworth, chief U.S. economist at Capital Economics, said in a note to clients that Trump doubled down on criticism of the Fed during his debate with Hillary Clinton.
Trump said the U.S. economy is in a “big, fat, ugly bubble” and specifically called out Yellen.
“And we have a Fed that’s doing political things. This Janet Yellen of the Fed,” he said. “The day Obama goes off, and he leaves, and goes out to the golf course for the rest of his life to play golf, when they raise interest rates, you’re going to see some very bad things happen, because the Fed is not doing their job...
...he would continue with his public criticisms of the Fed in the run-up to that meeting, arguing that a rate hike would be a political attempt to damage the economy ahead of his presidency. The main reason for believing that Yellen would resign almost immediately is that falling on her sword would take some of the political heat off the rest of the FOMC...
...Trump would in turn be more likely to nominate someone who would bow to political pressure — and leave interest rates lower for even longer than the Yellen-led Fed would have done.

11 hours lying!


Obama's Legacy


"with a cloth?"


I believe...


Idiot Logic




We demand...






The difference




I can live with that!


You might be a liberal if...