Cold Fury
Blog ^ | May 11, 2013 | Mike
The Benghazi Lie A failure of character of this magnitude corrodes the
integrity of the state.
That’s true, sure, but…the integrity of this State?
Really?
The State that rammed Obamacare straight up the ass of its subjects against
their will, clearly expressed in the 2010 anti-Ogabe landslide?
The State that jails dissident film makers for clumsily insulting the
not-quite-official-yet State religion?
The State that routinely pisses over its own Constitution, whose satraps and
autarchs merely laugh dismissively when questioned on their routine abuses of
power and attempt to provoke their opponents into violence (with the expected
complete impunity, it must be added) by taking a long walk through their very
midst brandishing a cartoonishly oversized prop gavel, laughing every step of
the way at the impotence of those opponents, rubbing their noses in their
absolute power?
The State whose satraps and autarchs lie, cheat, defraud, solicit bribery,
and swindle their way into power without the slightest fear of either legal
sanction or public disgrace?
The State even now engaging in a coverup of its obvious malfeasance in show
hearings on an act of war resulting in the murder of an ambassador, hearings
that will result in nothing of any real note or worth?
The State that has disbursed staggering sums of its subjects’ money to prop
up a global-warming bribery scam/power grab that has now been shown to be based
entirely on utter nonsense and fraud, with the real goal of manipulating the
global economy in the biggest socialistic transfer of wealth in history?
The State that continues a failed War On (Some) Drugs justified by falsehood
and manufactured hysteria not because it cares about its subjects’ health and
well-being–if it did, it wouldn’t jail untold millions of them, destroying their
lives for private, consensual behavior that harms no one in the overwhelming
majority of cases–but because of the opportunities it presents for corruption
and expanding its own power over them?
A State that seeks to control the smallest decisions its subjects make, while
still fatuously propagandizing about its being a “free” country, unique in all
the world–sanctimoniously repeating now-meaningless homilies about government
“of, by, and for the people,” and the sanctity of “democracy”? Whose minions
have audacity enough–presumption enough; sheer, coarse gall enough–to parrot
words uttered by far greater men than they in the service of their perverted
ambitions and greed…greater men whose grim and unmistakable warnings about the
inevitable tendency to tyranny are dismissed and pooh-poohed by the very pygmys
who have so debased the institutions those greater men founded in sweat, toil,
sacrifice, and blood?
A State that forcibly asserts control of its subjects’ children for the
formative years of their lives–not to educate them properly about the history of
the former Republic and the giants among men that were its Founders, but to
socialize them, training them in things like putting condoms on bananas,
brainwashing them about environmentalism, recycling, and PC groupthink
generally?
The State that uses the grief of subjects bereaved by the inevitable failure
of the State’s very own anti-gun policies as a prop to encroach even further on
those subjects’ natural rights, in what has to be one of the most disgustingly
cynical and outrageous exercises of misbegotten power and manipulation in human
history?
We’re even bothering to discuss the integrity of THAT State? Really?
No State ever really has much in the way of “integrity,” and this one far,
far less than most. Of course Steyn knows this, and contra my title, he
doesn’t really stumble at all with this column. In fact, it’s pretty much his
whole point.
Are murdered ambassadors like those 1.43 million cables she doesn’t read?
Just too many of them to keep track of? No. Only six had been killed in the
history of the republic — seven, if you include Arnold Raphel, who perished in
General Zia’s somewhat mysterious plane crash in Pakistan in 1988. Before that
you have to go back to Adolph Dubs, who died during a kidnapping attempt in
Kabul in 1979. So we have here a once-in-a-third-of-a-century event. And at 3
a.m. Libyan time on September 12 it’s still unfolding, with its outcome unclear.
Hicks is now America’s head man in the country, and the cabinet secretary to
whom he reports says, “Leave a message after the tone and I’ll get back to you
before the end of the week.” Just to underline the difference here: Libya’s head
of government calls Hicks, but nobody who matters in his own government can be
bothered to.
What was Secretary Clinton doing that was more important? What was the
president doing? Aside, that is, from resting up for his big Vegas campaign
event. A real government would be scrambling furiously to see what it could do
to rescue its people. It’s easy, afterwards, to say that nothing would have made
any difference. But, at the time Deputy Chief Hicks was calling 9-1-1 and
getting executive-branch voicemail, nobody in Washington knew how long it would
last. A terrorist attack isn’t like a soccer game, over in 90 minutes. If it is
a sport, it’s more like a tennis match: Whether it’s all over in three sets or
goes to five depends on how hard the other guy pushes back. The government of
the United States took the extremely strange decision to lose in straight sets.
Not only did they not deploy out-of-area assets, they ordered even those in
Libya to stand down. Lieutenant Colonel Gibson had a small team in Tripoli that
twice readied to go to Benghazi to assist and twice was denied authority to do
so, the latter when they were already at the airport. There weren’t many of
them, not compared to the estimated 150 men assailing the compound. But they
were special forces, not bozo jihadists. Back in Benghazi, Tyrone Woods and Glen
Doherty held off numerically superior forces for hours before dying on a rooftop
waiting for back-up from a government that had switched the answering machine on
and gone to Vegas.
Throughout the all-night firefight in Benghazi, Washington’s priority seems
to have been to do everything possible to deny that what was actually happening
was happening at all. To send “soldiers” on a “mission” to “fight” the “enemy”
was at odds with the entire Obama narrative of the Arab Spring and the broader
post-Bush Muslim world. And so the entire U.S. military was stood down in
support of the commander-in-chief’s fiction.
The grotesque parade of miscreants, reprobates, hacks, and out-and-out
criminals currently misruling us aren’t fit to govern, much less rule. Nearly
every last one of them should more properly be swinging from lampposts in the DC
streets until quite dead, their skulls later to be emptied, cleaned, and placed
permanently on the pikes of the White House fence, pour encourager les
autres…or more accurately, as a warning. It’s an indictment of our own
integrity that they haven’t been already. As Steyn says, they are depraved. And
so, apparently, are we. Mark knows this too:
As Mr. Hicks testified, his superiors in Washington knew early that night
that a well-executed terrorist attack with the possible participation of
al-Qaeda elements was under way. Instead of responding, the most powerful
figures in the government decided that an unseen YouTube video better served
their political needs. And, in the most revealing glimpse of the
administration’s depravity, the president and secretary of state peddled the lie
even in their mawkish eulogies to their buddy “Chris” and three other dead
Americans. They lied to the victims’ coffins and then strolled over to lie to
the bereaved, Hillary telling the Woods family that “we’re going to have that
person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.” And she did. The government
dispatched more firepower to arrest Nakoula Basseley Nakoula in Los Angeles than
it did to protect its mission in Benghazi. It was such a great act of
misdirection Hillary should have worn spangled tights and sawn Stevens’s casket
in half.
The dying Los Angeles Times reported this story on its homepage (as a
sidebar to “Thirteen Great Tacos in Southern California”) under the following
headline: “Partisan Politics Dominates House Benghazi Hearing.” In fact,
everyone in this story is a Democrat or a career civil servant. Chris Stevens
was the poster boy for Obama’s view of the Arab Spring; he agreed with the
president on everything that mattered. The only difference is that he wasn’t in
Vegas but out there on the front line, where Obama’s delusions meet reality.
Stevens believed in those illusions enough to die for them. One cannot say the
same about the hollow men and women in Washington who sent him out there
unprotected, declined to lift a finger when he came under attack, and in the
final indignity subordinated his sacrifice to their political needs by lying
over his corpse. Where’s the “partisan politics”? Obama, Clinton, Panetta,
Clapper, Rice, and the rest did this to one of their own. And fawning court
eunuchs, like the ranking Democrat at the hearings, Elijah Cummings, must surely
know that, if they needed, they’d do it to them, too. If you believe in politics
über alles, it’s impressive, in the same way that Hillary’s cocksure
dismissal — “What difference, at this point, does it make?” — is impressive.
But the embassy security chief, Eric Nordstrom, had the best answer to that:
It matters because “the truth matters” — not least to the Libyan president, who
ever since has held the U.S. government in utter contempt. Truth matters, and
character matters. For the American people to accept the Obama-Clinton lie is to
be complicit in it.
It’s perhaps Steyn’s harshest and most bitter column yet, and also one of his
best. Despite the fact that I’ve excerpted a larger chunk than usual, probably
more than fair use allows, you really want to read all of it–and gird your
loins. Because trouble is coming, as surely as the sunrise–bad trouble, and in
some ways at least, it’s going to be a very good thing. The tree of liberty will
soon be refreshed. Not because we wish it, but, as American patriots going all
the way back to Jefferson have always known, because it must be.
There will be blood. We can only pray it’s enough to wash us clean of the
stain left by our acquiescence in allowing such contemptible vermin to flout
decency by ruling over us in such a profoundly despicable way.
Update! More from Steyn at the Corner:
As Andy writes in his column, the Libyan president had publicly condemned the
terrorist attack in Benghazi, and was therefore stunned to switch on CNN
International and find Susan Rice insisting that it was all to do with a movie
protest – in other words, the US Government was lying to its own citizenry as
shamelessly as the Gaddafi or Assad regime would. What would you do in President
Magarief’s shoes? He knows the YouTube story is false, and he knows that
Washington knows it’s false, and knew it on the very night of the Benghazi
assault. And, quite reasonably enough, he has never trusted the Americans since.
One very immediate consequence of this is that the FBI were prevented from
getting into Libya – again entirely reasonably: Magarief knows Obama, Clinton
and Rice are peddling a fraud with no basis in reality, so it would seem prudent
to assume that any US agents he lets in are not there to find out the truth but
to prop up the fraud. So he kept them well away from Benghazi, for weeks.
The changes the State Department demanded in order not to undermine the FBI
investigation wound up undermining it (and US/Libyan relations) profoundly.
No matter, as long as the Ogabe shitweasels were enabled to hang onto their
illegitimate power. Elsewhere, Peter Kirsanow says this:
Shortly after the terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in
Benghazi, a local Denver television personality asked President Obama what
actions he took upon learning of the assault. The president asserted, “I gave
three very clear directives. Number one, make sure we are securing our personnel
and that we are doing whatever we need to. Number two, we are going to
investigate exactly what happened and make sure it doesn’t happen again. Number
three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice.”
As to the first directive, we now know from Greg Hicks’s testimony that
special forces were ordered to stand down rather than provide assistance.
Furthermore, we learned months ago from Jennifer Griffin’s reporting that former
Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods requested and was denied backup three times, and was told
to stand down. Who, then, gave the orders that flatly rejected the president’s
“very clear directive?” Was that person disciplined for flagrantly disobeying
the commander in chief?
Isn’t it far more likely that no directive was given than such directive was
repeatedly disobeyed?
Of course it is. In fact, the only time Ogabe would ever be likely to issue
such directives in the first place would be when the context is a struggle with
his domestic political opposition; he’ll never do any such thing to our enemies
abroad. He knows who his real enemies are–and, to quote Pogo, they are us.
DIOGENES invites you to pull up a chair on this fine day and read posts from around the world. The writing may lean to the right...but that's the way Diogenes wants it! You may leave your opinion, but Diogenes rarely changes his! WELCOME!
-
Free Government ^ | 1997 | Sraff Free government assisted cell phone programs have become more popular, in part, due to the poor economy ...
-
The Dems went down to Georgia They was looking for a seat to steal They were in a bind, 'cause they were way behind They were willing t...