Wednesday, November 4, 2015
Beat the Elite
Townhall.com ^ | November 4, 2015 | John Stossel
We love to complain about elites, people who seem to have a special advantage, privileges in life.
I get annoyed by the Kardashians and other spoiled rich kids. They didn't work for their wealth. They don't contribute.
Still, those elites are mostly harmless.
But there's one group of truly dangerous elites: politicians. Spoiled party kids may have stupid ideas, but they can't impose them on the rest of us. Politicians can, and do. It's an important distinction to remember.
In Thomas Sowell's book "The Vision of the Anointed" (which should have been titled "(Conceit of the Self- Anointed", Sowell points out that politicians use "the word 'ask' -- as in 'We are just asking everyone to pay their fair share.' But of course governments do not ask, they tell. The IRS does not 'ask' for contributions."
A rare presidential candidate who understands the importance of that difference is Sen. Rand Paul, who will appear on my TV show Friday. Paul points out that free markets get people to create things without force, and markets are much more efficient than governments.
"The Soviet Union was brought down because they couldn't determine one simple thing -- the price of bread," says Paul. "They had all these planners, but nobody can determine the price of bread. Only the market can."
Sadly, Paul hasn't inspired voters with that message, while his fellow senator, self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders, draws huge, cheering crowds. Front-runner Hillary Clinton doesn't call herself a socialist -- but she often acts like one.
"There's an irony here," says Paul, "because many of these people say, I'm pro-choice. No -- they're very anti-choice when it comes to market decisions. Producing stuff, buying stuff, selling stuff -- you're not allowed to do it. They're the anti- choice party. That's what socialism is."
People defend government spending out of concern for the poor, but what we get from government often has little to do with helping those at the bottom. "We just discovered," says Paul, "that they spent $800,000 developing a televised cricket league for Afghanistan ... and they spent $150,000 for yoga classes for federal employees."
This habit of taking money and power from citizens all over America and letting Washington elites decide how to use it doesn't exist just among Democrats. Paul sees it among Republican supporters of Donald Trump, too. Their attitude, says Paul, is "nobody quite knows exactly what economic system that celebrity is for, but trust him because he's smart and all-powerful -- give him more power and he'll fix everything."
By contrast, Paul says, "I'm not running to run the economy or the country."
I worry that, to most people, that sounds like a politician not "doing his job." People do seem eager to vote for a politician who will "lead," and "take charge."
But I don't want to be led. I'm not a child. I don't need elites in Washington, D.C., to boss me around and then tax me for it.
I wish voters would read Matt Ridley's new book, "The Evolution of Everything." He points out that when it comes to the innovations that make the most difference in our lives -- medicine, smartphones, search engines, even language -- it's not the elite planners who bring progress.
"It comes from the bottom up," says Ridley. "What happens in technology or morality or culture or any other aspect of human life is that ordinary people interacting with each other is the source of most innovation, most change in the world."
These good things happen in a decentralized, unplanned way all around us -- and it's been that way since humans first evolved.
Ridley says, "We give far too much credit to the people who are in charge, the people who seem to be on top of things and running things. They're just taking the credit."
Politicians should admit that more often. But that would require them to be humble. Loudly pretending to be in charge is their specialty.
We love to complain about elites, people who seem to have a special advantage, privileges in life.
I get annoyed by the Kardashians and other spoiled rich kids. They didn't work for their wealth. They don't contribute.
Still, those elites are mostly harmless.
But there's one group of truly dangerous elites: politicians. Spoiled party kids may have stupid ideas, but they can't impose them on the rest of us. Politicians can, and do. It's an important distinction to remember.
In Thomas Sowell's book "The Vision of the Anointed" (which should have been titled "(Conceit of the Self- Anointed", Sowell points out that politicians use "the word 'ask' -- as in 'We are just asking everyone to pay their fair share.' But of course governments do not ask, they tell. The IRS does not 'ask' for contributions."
A rare presidential candidate who understands the importance of that difference is Sen. Rand Paul, who will appear on my TV show Friday. Paul points out that free markets get people to create things without force, and markets are much more efficient than governments.
"The Soviet Union was brought down because they couldn't determine one simple thing -- the price of bread," says Paul. "They had all these planners, but nobody can determine the price of bread. Only the market can."
Sadly, Paul hasn't inspired voters with that message, while his fellow senator, self-proclaimed socialist Bernie Sanders, draws huge, cheering crowds. Front-runner Hillary Clinton doesn't call herself a socialist -- but she often acts like one.
"There's an irony here," says Paul, "because many of these people say, I'm pro-choice. No -- they're very anti-choice when it comes to market decisions. Producing stuff, buying stuff, selling stuff -- you're not allowed to do it. They're the anti- choice party. That's what socialism is."
People defend government spending out of concern for the poor, but what we get from government often has little to do with helping those at the bottom. "We just discovered," says Paul, "that they spent $800,000 developing a televised cricket league for Afghanistan ... and they spent $150,000 for yoga classes for federal employees."
This habit of taking money and power from citizens all over America and letting Washington elites decide how to use it doesn't exist just among Democrats. Paul sees it among Republican supporters of Donald Trump, too. Their attitude, says Paul, is "nobody quite knows exactly what economic system that celebrity is for, but trust him because he's smart and all-powerful -- give him more power and he'll fix everything."
By contrast, Paul says, "I'm not running to run the economy or the country."
I worry that, to most people, that sounds like a politician not "doing his job." People do seem eager to vote for a politician who will "lead," and "take charge."
But I don't want to be led. I'm not a child. I don't need elites in Washington, D.C., to boss me around and then tax me for it.
I wish voters would read Matt Ridley's new book, "The Evolution of Everything." He points out that when it comes to the innovations that make the most difference in our lives -- medicine, smartphones, search engines, even language -- it's not the elite planners who bring progress.
"It comes from the bottom up," says Ridley. "What happens in technology or morality or culture or any other aspect of human life is that ordinary people interacting with each other is the source of most innovation, most change in the world."
These good things happen in a decentralized, unplanned way all around us -- and it's been that way since humans first evolved.
Ridley says, "We give far too much credit to the people who are in charge, the people who seem to be on top of things and running things. They're just taking the credit."
Politicians should admit that more often. But that would require them to be humble. Loudly pretending to be in charge is their specialty.
Tuesday, November 3, 2015
Feds Send Man to Jail for Overfishing as 6,000 Drug Convicts are Freed!
Judicial Watch ^ | NOVEMBER 02, 2015
These are embarrassing times for the nation's criminal justice system; as the Obama administration executes the nation's largest mass release of federal prisoners, it's sending a Long Island fisherman to jail for reeling in too many...
Back in 2010 resident Obama signed a measure that for the first time in decades relaxed drug-crime sentences he claimed discriminated against poor and minority offenders. This severely weakened a decades-old law enacted during the infamous crack cocaine epidemic that ravaged urban communities nationwide in the 1980s.
As part of the movement the U.S. Sentencing Commission lowered maximum sentences for drug offenders and made it retroactive. Last week the administration started releasing the first wave of 6,000 drug convicts who will get out of jail early. In all, about 50,000 prisoners are eligible for early release ... Federal prosecutors have warned that drug trafficking is inherently violent and therefore the phrase "non-violent drug offenders" is a misnomer. The nation's prosecutors also caution that reducing prison sentences for drug offenders will weaken their ability to bring dangerous drug traffickers to justice.
...
Last week the New York fisherman got sentenced to seven months in prison, a $603,000 fine and three years of supervised release following incarceration ... Is it possible that the country is safer because a fish fraudster is in jail ... while drug convicts roam freely?
These are embarrassing times for the nation's criminal justice system; as the Obama administration executes the nation's largest mass release of federal prisoners, it's sending a Long Island fisherman to jail for reeling in too many...
Back in 2010 resident Obama signed a measure that for the first time in decades relaxed drug-crime sentences he claimed discriminated against poor and minority offenders. This severely weakened a decades-old law enacted during the infamous crack cocaine epidemic that ravaged urban communities nationwide in the 1980s.
As part of the movement the U.S. Sentencing Commission lowered maximum sentences for drug offenders and made it retroactive. Last week the administration started releasing the first wave of 6,000 drug convicts who will get out of jail early. In all, about 50,000 prisoners are eligible for early release ... Federal prosecutors have warned that drug trafficking is inherently violent and therefore the phrase "non-violent drug offenders" is a misnomer. The nation's prosecutors also caution that reducing prison sentences for drug offenders will weaken their ability to bring dangerous drug traffickers to justice.
...
Last week the New York fisherman got sentenced to seven months in prison, a $603,000 fine and three years of supervised release following incarceration ... Is it possible that the country is safer because a fish fraudster is in jail ... while drug convicts roam freely?
(Excerpt) Read more at judicialwatch.org ...
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
-
Army Times ^ | May 7, 2017 | Todd South After carrying the M16 or one of its cousins across the globe for more than half a century, sol...
