Saturday, May 6, 2017

How Liberals Use Compassion to Hurt People

Townhall.com ^ | May 6, 2017 | John Hawkins 


Of course, most conservatives are well aware of the damage liberals do to minorities with their supposed compassion. Liberal “compassion” toward minorities consists of treating them like incompetents who can’t do anything for themselves, fish-hooking them through the jaw with government assistance, and encouraging them to nurse grievances and feel like victims.

That is not compassionate and, as I note in my new book, “101 Things All Young Adults Should Know,” it doesn’t make anyone’s life better over the long haul.

Oh, but what about the government? Do you really want its help? Do you want to feel all those eyes burning into your back when you whip out those food stamps? Do you want to live in crummy government housing?
Do you want to jump through whatever hoops some dead-eyed bureaucrat comes up with so you can get just enough help to stay poor and miserable? Is that the sort of person you admire? Is that the one you grew up wanting to be? You should want more out of life than what the government is willing to give to you in return for your pride.
What’s more compassionate? Encouraging and helping people to pull themselves up by their own bootstraps, or trapping them in poverty, anger and misery long-term?
However, there is a much more insidious way liberals use “compassion” to hurt others that slips past many people.
If you pay attention, what you’ll notice is that the liberals who assure you that they are endlessly compassionate, sensitive, and tolerant only feel those emotions toward certain groups. In other words, their supposed compassion is incredibly selective.
So, the death of Harambe the Gorilla? It’s a terrible tragedy. A baby whose continued existence would cut into Planned Parenthood’s profit margins? They feel nothing.
A black thug who attacks a cop and gets shot to death? No justice, no peace! A police officer who gets murdered in the line of duty? They feel nothing.
Rioting students who disrupt a speaker and smash windows? Poor dears! They were triggered and their response was understandable. The conservative who was invited to campus to speak and the audience that was stopped from hearing him? They feel nothing.
Attacking the children of a Democrat? Scandalous! Outrageous! Whatever happened to decency in politics? Attacking the children of a Republican? Hahaha! Those late night comedians are so funny!
This is the ultimate liberal lie: weaponized compassion.
Once you choose which groups matter and which groups don’t, then you control the conversation, the culture, and politics. Woe be unto you if you’re in a group that liberals have no “compassion” for, because your problems will be treated as absolutely irrelevant by the school system, mainstream media, and Hollywood.
This is why liberals get so upset when someone says “All lives matter” instead of “Black lives matter.” It’s because they desperately need to control whom we have compassion for and whom we don’t. Since black Americans vote monolithically for the Democrat Party and falsely convincing them that they’re in grave danger of being shot by a cop at any moment might spur them to vote, liberals feel “compassion” over the issue. Do they care about police officers getting killed? Black on black violence? The victims of violent crime? No, because that doesn’t benefit them.
Is “compassion” really compassion if it’s based almost entirely on political gain and virtue signaling? Apparently liberals think so.
Don’t underestimate the impact of this tactic. Deciding which people in society we are supposed to all empathize with and which we are indifferent to is a powerful tool.
Take Jimmy Kimmel’s recent speech about his baby nearly dying shortly after he was born. It’s certainly a sad situation, and no one wants to see someone’s child become seriously ill. However, here we have a man worth 35 million dollars who wants other people to pay for his child’s health care. That’s obnoxious. Worse yet, Kimmel falsely indicated that babies like his son that were born ill weren’t covered before Obamacare. That’s simply not true. Sure, anybody can understand Kimmel’s emotional reaction to his son’s illness, but that doesn’t mean it’s okay for him to lie or exploit his child’s illness to push his grubby political agenda.
Furthermore, the coverage of Kimmel’s comments were fawning because we’re all supposed to feel infinite compassion for his situation and thus must do whatever liberals want us to do -- which in this case is to continue to support Obamacare despite the fact that it’s falling apart and hurting a lot of people.
As my friend Mary Katharine Ham noted (edited slightly), "To many, it only matters when people are potentially hurt by changes to Obamacare, not actually hurt by Obamacare."
Why does a celebrity like Jimmy Kimmel deserve our compassion for his admittedly difficult situation while tens of millions of ordinary Americans have lost plans, lost doctors and have seen their deductibles and premiums skyrocket into the stratosphere aren’t given the same courtesy? The number of people hurt by Obamacare vastly outnumber the people who have been helped, so why don’t they deserve some compassion? Why don’t their struggles matter too?
It’s because liberals only feel “compassion” when they think it benefits them and in their minds; no one else deserves an ounce of sympathy, compassion or even human decency. That’s not real compassion. That’s a sickness masquerading as compassion.

Unlike ObamaCare, The GOP Health Bill Wasn't Built On Lies And False Promises

Investor's Business Daily ^ | 5/5/2017 | Staff 

Health Reform: While everyone is busy picking apart the flaws of the Republican ObamaCare replacement bill, one inconvenient truth is being overlooked: ObamaCare itself has been a colossal disaster.

Remember how ObamaCare was sold to the public: If you like your plan, you can keep your plan. It will lower premiums by $2,500, increase choice and competition, make health care affordable, create jobs, cut the deficit.

None of those promises came true. In 2013, millions discovered that the "keep your plan" promise was a lie — PolitiFact gave it the "Lie of the Year" award — when they started getting cancellation notices from their insurers. The Obama administration scrambled to minimize the political fallout by letting some keep those plans.

While Obama repeatedly promised a premium cut thanks to improved efficiency in the health care system, the opposite occurred. Workplace premiums for family plans jumped 9.4% the year after ObamaCare became law, and rose $4,767 from 2009 to 2006. ObamaCare premiums are going up at double-digit rates.
(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...

HILLARY CLINTON, SOREST LOSER IN HISTORY

Canada Free Press ^ | 05/06/17 | Jeff Crouere 

Obviously, Hillary Clinton prefers fantasy to the harsh political reality of her disastrous campaign.

It has been six months since the political world was rocked to its core with the upset election of Donald Trump as President. One person who has not gotten over Trump’s victory is his opponent, Hillary Clinton.

Of course, in the days before the election, almost every pollster and commentator predicted a Clinton victory. She was overconfident and believed the media spin. Incredibly, she was outperformed by a political novice, who won 306 electoral votes in 31 states, an unexpected landslide.

What the Republican Health Plan Gets Right (NY Times gets one right?)

nytimes.com ^ | Marc Siegel 

Now that the Obamacare replacement bill has passed the House and is moving on to the more centrist Senate, the real debate begins. What is the true purpose of health insurance, and what is our government’s goal in ensuring we have it?
I learn from my patients every day about the benefits, limitations and contradictions of their health insurance. One charming 60-year-old with severe seasonal allergies insists on seeing me every few weeks this time of year, even though I tell her she doesn’t need to — her antihistamines and nasal spray treatment rarely changes. But she worries that her allergies could be hiding an infection, so I investigate her sinuses, throat, lungs and ears. I reassure her, and her insurance (which she buys through New York’s Obamacare exchange) covers the bill.
If she was responsible for more than a small co-payment for these visits, I’m sure I would see her less often.
We pride ourselves on being a compassionate society, and insurance companies use this to manipulate us into sharing the costs of other people’s excessive health care. Meanwhile, 5 percent of Americans generate more than 50 percent of health care expenses. Why shouldn’t a patient who continues to see me unnecessarily pay more? Continue reading the main story
Advertisement Continue reading the main story
The government’s job is to maintain public health and safety. It should ensure that insurance plans include mandatory benefits like emergency, epidemic, vaccine and addiction coverage. The Republican bill would let states apply for waivers to define these benefits differently; it would be a big mistake to drop such coverage entirely. But Obamacare went well beyond these essentials, by mandating an overstuffed prix fixe meal filled with benefits like maternity and mental health coverage...
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...

A Liberal

http://www.conservapedia.com ^ | unknown | Editorial 

A liberal is someone who craves an increase in government spending, power, and control, such as ObamaCare. Liberals also support the censorship and denial of Christianity. Liberals who are a part of the secular left prefer the atheist religion over the Christian faith, as atheism has no objective morality to hinder their big government plans.

Increasingly, liberals side with the homosexual agenda, including homosexual "marriage". Liberals favor a welfare state where people receive endless entitlements without working. The liberal ideology has degenerated into economically unsound views and intolerant ideology. All liberals support, in knee-jerk fashion, the opposite of conservative principles, while lacking an actual ideology or values of their own. Many of them cannot understand Christian language.

Polling data has consistently shown that an increasingly large percentage of Americans identify as conservative, rather than as liberal, currently by 38% to 21%.[6] However, liberals and "progressives" oftentimes falsely say the exact opposite.

Liberals support the following political positions and practices:[7] Wasting money on ineffective government programs (the significant economic problems in the Eurozone due to government debt will no doubt increasingly discredit this aspect of liberal ideology and make things more difficult for advocates of liberal economic ideologies) Denial of science[8] (especially creation science) Government's ability to solve economic problems[9]? Hypocrisy[10] The belief that terrorism is not a huge threat, and that the main reason for Muslim extremists' hostility towards America is because of bad foreign policy [9] Brainwashing voters with propaganda Hedonism Taxpayer-funded and state-encouraged abortion Rejection of Biblical standards Hatred Murder (through abortion, infanticide, assisted suicide, and euthanasia) Censorship Socialism Unsuccessful Keynesian economics as opposed to sound free market economics Crying instead of accepting reality Cessation of teacher-led prayer in classrooms and school/state-sponsored religious events. Ending Western morality Gun control Tyranny Treason Elitism Pseudo-intellectualism Affirmative action Opposition to government regulation or restriction of obscenity, pornography and violence in video games as a First Amendment right Authoritarian government Genocide Government-funded medical care, such as Obamacare Fascism Belief in evolution Destroying the Christian foundations on which America was built on. Destroying conservative family values and replacing them with immoral Hollywood values, such as abortion Brainwashing through government-censored public education Limiting personal freedom.[23] Liberal support for gun control is an example of this. High progressive taxes as a form of class warfare against wealthy business owners. Placement of men and women in the same jobs in the military Slowly eroding the U.S. through Progressivism. Legalized same-sex "marriage" and homosexual adoption Failed tax and spend economics Smearing[27] Libertine sexual morality. See: Evolutionary belief and sexual immorality and Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity Economic sector regulations Denial of conservative roles in history. For example, liberals frequently claim that George Washington was a deist when he was actually a devout Episcopalian. Corruption Spreading of political correctness Sadism Government mass-surveillance Non-syndicalist labor unions Racism Bigotry Anti-Semitism Advocating incorrect policies Encouraging promiscuity and immorality through sexual education rather than teaching abstinence from premarital sex[33] A "living Constitution" that is reinterpreted as liberals prefer, rather than how it is thought to have been intended. Government programs to rehabilitate criminals Slander Gender Equality Obesity Anti-Americanism Bestiality as a human right Abolition of the death penalty Environmentalism Globalism Pedophilia Unconstitutionally mandated separation of church and state. Opposition to full private property rights. Reinstatement of the Fairness Doctrine Welfare Stalinism Opposition to domestic wire-tapping as authorized in the Patriot Act Mutilating corpses Oppression of business rather than a laissez-faire capitalist economy Enforced homosexuality Opposition to the Constitution. Liberals seek to expand federal power at the expense of local government and silence the conservatives who hold them back, violating the 10th and 1st Amendments respectively. Denial of traditional gender roles Robbery and other forms of crime (see Gun control) Support of financially irresponsible policies Slavery Encouragement of "global warming" alarmism Rejection of logical standards
Liberals currently use two Clauses of the Constitution to try to expand their power: the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The General Welfare Clause mentions "promoting the general welfare". This to a liberal means taxing the rich at increased rates and redistributing that money. The Commerce Clause, on the other hand, says that Congress has the power to regulate trade with foreign nations, between the states and with the Indian tribes. Since the days of FDR this Clause has been interpreted very loosely and has resulted in the federal government expanding its power. The latest example is The Affordable Care Act (ACA), better known as Obamacare. In the ACA, the liberals justify the individual mandate by saying it regulates commerce between the states.
The decline in liberal principles can be illustrated by how Franklin Delano Roosevelt opposed and condemned public sector unions, stating that the idea of collective bargaining can't be transferred from the private to the public sector, as that would result in the government being unable to carry out its duties. Yet today, decades later, Democrats and liberals are in lock-step with public sector unions, as they "donate" money to the reelection campaign in exchange for more taxpayer money in their wallets and fluffed up pensions.
Current dictionaries describe the liberal ideology by pretending that a liberal is "a person who favors a political philosophy of progress and reform and the protection of civil liberties" or "a person who favors an economic theory of laissez-faire and self-regulating markets, or "open-minded or tolerant, especially free of or not bound by traditional or conventional ideas, values, etc." or "favorable to or in accord with concepts of maximum individual freedom possible, especially as guaranteed by law and secured by governmental protection of civil liberties." In practical usage, the term "liberal" is more closely synonymous with "radical," "immoral," "anti-freedom," "elitist," or "bad."
Contents 1 Liberals and uncharitableness ?1.1 Liberal politicians and uncharitableness
2 Liberals and superstition 3 Secular left ?3.1 Decline of the secular left
4 Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity 5 Liberalism in the United States Today ?5.1 Liberal Rankings of Congress Members 5.2 American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism
6 Liberalism in Europe today 7 Historical Liberalism 8 Original meaning: Classical Liberalism 9 Notable liberal "intellects" 10 Liberal Organizations of thought 11 Quotes on Liberals 12 Quotes by Liberals 13 Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation 14 References
Liberals and uncharitableness
See also: Liberals and uncharitableness and Atheism and charity
American liberals have been observed to give less to charity than American conservatives. In March 2008, George Will wrote at RealClearPolitics concerning the United States:
“ Sixteen months ago, Arthur C. Brooks, a professor at Syracuse University, published "Who Really Cares: The Surprising Truth About Compassionate Conservatism." The surprise is that liberals are markedly less charitable than conservatives.... If many conservatives are liberals who have been mugged by reality, Brooks, a registered independent, is, as a reviewer of his book said, a social scientist who has been mugged by data. They include these findings:
Although liberal families' incomes average 6 percent higher than those of conservative families, conservative-headed households give, on average, 30 percent more to charity than the average liberal-headed household ($1,600 per year vs. $1,227).
Conservatives also donate more time and give more blood. ”
Atheists and agnostics often reject Biblical morality (and therefore conservative Christianity ) and hold to moral relativism. Therefore, it is not surprising that per capita atheists and agnostics in America give significantly less to charity than theists even when church giving is not counted for theists.
Liberal politicians and uncharitableness
The political magazine the American Spectator featured an article which focused on liberal politicians and uncharitableness exposing the hypocrisy of the liberal politicians it featured.[48]
In addition, Barack Obama has been criticized concerning his lack of charitable giving.
Liberals and superstition
The Wall Street Journal reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows ...that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience than evangelical Christians."[49] See also: Irreligion and superstition
The Wall Street Journal reported: "A comprehensive new study released by Baylor University, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology.[50]
Also, in September of 2008, the Wall Street Journal reported:
“ The reality is that the New Atheist campaign, by discouraging religion, won't create a new group of intelligent, skeptical, enlightened beings. Far from it: It might actually encourage new levels of mass superstition. And that's not a conclusion to take on faith — it's what the empirical data tell us. "What Americans Really Believe," a comprehensive new study released by Baylor University yesterday, shows that traditional Christian religion greatly decreases belief in everything from the efficacy of palm readers to the usefulness of astrology. It also shows that the irreligious and the members of more liberal Protestant denominations, far from being resistant to superstition, tend to be much more likely to believe in the paranormal and in pseudoscience, such as evolution than evangelical Christians....
This is not a new finding. In his 1983 book "The Whys of a Philosophical Scrivener," skeptic and science writer Martin Gardner cited the decline of traditional religious belief among the better educated as one of the causes for an increase in pseudoscience, cults and superstition. He referenced a 1980 study published in the magazine Skeptical Inquirer that showed irreligious college students to be by far the most likely to embrace paranormal beliefs, while born-again Christian college students were the least likely.[50] ”
Secular left
See also: Secular left
The secular left consists of left-wing secularists who are able to exert their influence in many countries. They support "strict government secularism".
Decline of the secular left
See also: Decline of the secular left
In some regions where the secular left has considerable influence, they are losing an increasing amount of their power.
Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity
See also: Liberal Christianity and marital infidelity and Liberal Christianity
According to a 2007 study reported in the Journal of Family Issues, adherents of liberal Christianity are more likely to engage in marital infidelity than theologically conservative Christians.
As noted above, liberals are more likely to adhere to evolutionary belief than conservatives. A study conducted by the Australian National University, revealed that belief in evolution is associated with moral permissiveness.
Liberalism in the United States Today
Smear merchants
Democrats and most media outlets in the U.S. are blatantly liberal. Liberalism in North America today practices three primary tactics to attack the Republican Party, and sometimes to attack American values in general. These three liberal tactics can be pronounced using the following acronym: SIN
Liberals (1) shift the subject, they (2) ignore the facts, and they (3) name call. Liberals typically support a "mixed" economy, a policy similar to that of fascism.
Liberals claimed a monopoly on compassion, decency, and social justice (as defined by themselves), posing as the sole defenders of civic virtue against a horde of backwoodsmen, racists, and religious fanatics. (http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/03/the_disgrace_of_liberalism.html)
“ There's another goal, from my point of view, which is to try to lay the groundwork for a radical political force which would conceive of itself as distinctly to the left of moderate, reformist American liberals. And that has two aspects. One is to try to change that liberalism, to transform it by analysis, critique, and activism; the second is to build a radical movement which would be an autonomous force in its own right, which would be distinct from the traditional American liberal consensus. This radical part of the program involves not simply supporting the liberal students against conservative students and conservative professors, but trying to act on them, to push them to the left. It also involves trying to find and support, even trying to help create, networks of radical students in law school and of radical professors around the country — students and teachers who see themselves as wanting to go a lot further than most people want to go.[58] ”
Liberal Rankings of Congress Members
The National Journal compiles the votes of each congress member each year and uses the information to create rankings of how liberal each member of the United States Congress is. In addition to showing the voting records of each member and given an overall all ranking of liberalness, the National Journal also ranks congress members by liberalness in the areas of social, economic, and foreign policy.
American liberalism, demographics and expected tipping point in the decline of American liberalism
See also: American atheism and Decline of atheism and Global atheism
Due to the explosive growth of global Christianity in traditional cultures and their influence on Western Christianity and the higher birth rate of conservative Christians and religious conservatives, social conservatism is expected to rise.
The Birkbeck College, University of London professor Eric Kaufman wrote in his 2010 book Shall the Righteous Inherit the Earth? concerning America:
“ High evangelical fertility rates more than compensated for losses to liberal Protestant sects during the twentieth century. In recent decades, white secularism has surged, but Latino and Asian religious immigration has taken up the slack, keeping secularism at bay. Across denominations, the fertility advantage of religious fundamentalists of all colours is significant and growing. After 2020, their demographic weight will to tip the balance in the culture wars towards the conservative side, ramping up pressure on hot-button issues such as abortion. By the end of the century, three quarters of America may be pro-life. Their activism will leap over the borders of the 'Redeemer Nation' to evangelize the world. Already, the rise of the World Congress of Families has launched a global religious right, its arms stretching across the bloody lines of the War on Terror to embrace the entire Abrahamic family.”
Liberalism in Europe today
In Europe, on the other hand, parties that call themselves liberal are moderate in outlook, ranging from centre-left to centre-right, promote typically economic and business freedom. The Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe is a party of the European Parliament that represents most liberal parties from European countries. Similar policies are promoted by many liberal parties throughout the world, such as the Liberal Party of Australia.
Trade unions and socialist parties often criticize politicians for promoting lower taxes on business, or more flexible hiring and firing laws, by calling them "liberals" or neoliberals. Thus, just as in the US, "liberal" may occasionally be used as a term of abuse. But when someone is called "liberal" in Europe, it has an entirely different meaning than in the US. In fact, the US meaning of liberal is more similar to the politics of European socialist or social democratic parties.
Historical Liberalism
In history, the word "liberal" has meant different things at different times, and was associated with individual liberty in prior centuries. In the postwar period, liberals supported government intervention in the economy and welfare state policies, as well as peaceful coexistence with the communist block, which are not liberal policies in the sense of classical liberalism. After the end of the cold war, with the demise of socialism and communism, many liberals embraced some ideas from economic neo-liberalism, and coined it the "Third Way". In the area of national security and foreign policy liberals in the U.S. failed to define a consistent stance, even after the events of 9/11 and the beginning of the war in Iraq. Liberals generally support affirmative action, gay marriage, and abortion.
Original meaning: Classical Liberalism
Liberalism is a political philosophy with freedom as its core value. The term was originally applied to supporters of individual liberties and equal rights, but, in America, the term has come to represent a movement of social change that often conflicts with conservative values such as moral values and traditions derived from Northern European Protestantism.
See Classical Liberalism. Compare Libertarianism.
Notable liberal "intellects"
See also: Infamous liberals Margaret Sanger King George III Barack Hussein Obama[66] John Maynard Keynes Dracula David Thorstad, a founding member of NAMBLA. Al Gore Adolf Hitler Karl Marx Pope Francis Lee Harvey Oswald Che Guevara Francisco Franco Kim Jong-un Hillary Rodham Clinton Mao Zedong Benito Mussolini Albert Einstein Pol Pot Margaret Thatcher - Conservative by UK standards, but decriminalized homosexuality. Joseph Stalin Bill Nye Attila the Hun Osama bin Laden John Wayne Gacy - In an interview where he denied killing any of his victims, serial killer John Wayne Gacy said he was bisexual and "very liberal". Gacy was also a Democratic Party activist who had his picture taken with Rosalynn Carter.
Liberal Organizations of thought
AARP - American Association of Retired People ACLU - American Civil Liberties Union ACORN - Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now AFL-CIO - American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations AI - Amnesty International ANSWER - Act Now to Stop War and End Racism CAIR - Council on American-Islamic Relations Committees of Correspondence for Democracy and Socialism Democratic National Committee Greenpeace MoveOn.org NARAL - National Abortion and Reproductive Rights Action League NAACP - National Association for the Advancement of Colored People National Committee for an Effective Congress National Education Association NOW - National Organization of Women PETA - People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals Planned Parenthood Federation of America Progressives for Obama Rainbow/PUSH Coalition SEIU - Service Employees International Union U.S. Peace Council
Source: The Politix Group (http://web.archive.org/web/20060509044946/http://www.politixgroup.com/lo.htm)
Quotes on Liberals
"I never use the words Democrats and Republicans. It's liberals and Americans." -James Watt, Secretary of the Interior under Ronald Reagan
"The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so." -Ronald Reagan
“Liberals see racism where it doesn't exist, fabricate it when they can't find it and ignore it within their own ranks.” Michelle Malkin
"Words mean nothing to liberals. They say whatever will help advance their cause at the moment, switch talking points in a heartbeat, and then act indignant if anyone uses the exact same argument they were using five minutes ago." Ann Coulter
"The reason any conservative's failing is always major news is that it allows liberals to engage in their very favorite taunt: Hypocrisy! Hypocrisy is the only sin that really inflames them. Inasmuch as liberals have no morals, they can sit back and criticize other people for failing to meet the standards that liberals simply renounce. It's an intriguing strategy. By openly admitting to being philanderers, draft dodgers, liars, weasels and cowards, liberals avoid ever being hypocrites." -Ann Coulter
"If you can somehow force a liberal into a point-counterpoint argument, his retorts will bear no relation to what you've said -- unless you were in fact talking about your looks, your age, your weight, your personal obsessions, or whether you are a fascist. In the famous liberal two-step, they leap from one idiotic point to the next, so you can never nail them. It's like arguing with someone with Attention Deficit Disorder." -Ann Coulter
"Inside many liberals is a totalitarian screaming to get out. They don't like to have another point of view in the room that they don't squash and the way they try to squash it is by character assassination and name calling." David Horowitz
"End results that work that don't involve government threaten liberals." Rush Limbaugh
Quotes by Liberals
"The number one job facing the middle class, and it happens to be, as Barack says, a three-letter word: jobs. J-O-B-S." Joe Biden
"There is no reason the nation of Africa cannot, and should not, join the ranks of the worlds most prosperous nations." Joe Biden
"Romney wants to give EIGHT HUNDRED MILLION BILLION in tax breaks to the rich." Joe Biden
"Will the Mars Rover be able to show the flag the astronauts planted there before?" Sheila Jackson Lee
"Isn't it a little racist to call it Black Friday?" Joy Behar
"Is there such a thing as a man-made stroke? …I know what this [Republican] party is capable of." Joy Behar
"During my service in the United States Congress, I took the initiative in creating the Internet." Al Gore
"The center of the earth is about a million degrees." Al Gore
"A zebra does not change its spots." Al Gore
"The government lied about inventing the HIV virus as a means of genocide against people of color. The government lied." Jeremiah Wright
"Every month that we do not have an economic recovery package 500 million Americans lose their jobs." -Nancy Pelosi
"My favorite word, that is really easy, my favorite word is 'the word'." Nancy Pelosi
"We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it” Nancy Pelosi
"Why can't I just eat my waffle?" Barack Hussein Obama
"Over the last 15 months, we’ve traveled to every corner of the United States. I’ve now been in 57 states? I think one left to go." Barack Hussein Obama
"Welcome to Cinco de Quattro!" Barack Obama
"The time has changed for come." Barack Obama
"They support democratic institutions in Kyrzakhstan" -John Kerry
"My fear is that the whole island (of Guam) will become so overly populated that it will tip over and capsize." -Democrat Congressman Hank Johnson
"Winnie the Pooh seems to me to be a fundamental text on national security." Obama foreign policy adviser Richard Danzig
"If you take out the killings, Washington actually has a very very low crime rate." -Former D.C. Mayor Marion Barry
"What right does Congress have to go around making laws just because they deem it necessary?" Marion Barry
"My appetite is so good that I can eat the table cloth right off the chair." Democratic Congressman Joe Moakley
"Those who died in the earthquake, their lives will never be the same again." Barbara Boxer
"I dare you, you little fruitcake!" Democratic Congressman Pete Stark
"I root for hurricanes" James Wolcott
"I've got a secret for you: Kiss my a**." -George McGovern
"The American people will never knowingly adopt Socialism. But under the name of 'liberalism' they will adopt every fragment of the Socialist program, until one day America will be a Socialist nation, without knowing how it happened." -Norman Thomas, six-time U.S. Presidential candidate for the Socialist Party of America
Modern liberalism and the use of mockery rather than reasonable argumentation See also: Atheism and mockery
In a BloombergView article, Stephen L. Carter wrote about modern liberalism:
“ But the left has work to do, not only on policy and organization but also on attitude. Too many of my progressive friends seem to have forgotten how to make actual arguments, and have become expert instead at condemnation, derision and mockery. On issue after issue, they’re very good at explaining why no one could oppose their policy positions except for the basest of motives. As to those positions themselves, they are too often announced with a zealous solemnity suggesting that their views are Holy Writ -- and those who disagree are cast into the outer political darkness. In short, the left has lately been dripping with hubris, which in classic literature always portends a fall.

Born Perfect: the LGBT Movement vs. Reality

American Thinker ^ | 6 May, 2017 | Fay Voshell 

Time was any person who declared himself perfect invited ridicule along with a suggestion he have his head examined.

But those days apparently are long gone, at least according to the National Center for Lesbian Rights, which has recently declared there are classes of people who are born perfect, whose sexual and gender choices are infallible and therefore not to be subjected to anything resembling criticism, much less “conversion therapy.”

A few years ago, NCLR began a campaign to end all conversion therapy, believing that attempts to change any youth’s sexual orientation or choice of gender invited irreparable psychological trauma, as such choices were inherently infallible. Consequently, NCLR and similar organizations began a campaign to outlaw all conversion therapy.
(Excerpt) Read more at americanthinker.com ...

Obama’s Intelligence Agencies

The Coach's Team ^ | Saturday, May 6, 2017 | Jim Emerson, staff writer 

In his final year in office Mr. Obama’s administration significantly expanded the availability of National Security Agency (NSA) intercepts of American citizens. His order spread unredacted intelligence reports across many government entities, many without a need to know, to have, or share either before or after the 2016 presidential election. The reports put in full view the names of American citizens. This may validate Maxine Waters’ claim of Obama’s secret database in 2013.

Data released this week by the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) provided evidence of NSA’s collection of info on American Citizens, maintained in a searchable database. Names of American citizens were being searched and “disseminated after President Obama loosened privacy protections to make such sharing easier in 2011 in the name of national security.” Last year, intelligence reports identified Americans who had been intercepted talking to foreign sources, or who were the subject of conversations between two or more monitored, foreign figures. In the warped logic of liberal politics, if two Russians were talking about President Trump, it would be proof of a “Russian connection.”

Sometimes Americans were officially unmasked or their identities so lightly disguised they were readily discernible. The principle consumers of the unredacted reports were Obama’s national security adviser Susan Rice, his CIA Director John Brennan and then-Attorney General Loretta Lynch. Spying on political enemies is nothing new; President Johnson instructed his people to spy on Nixon during the election of 1968. President Trump’s claim that he was being spied by the Obama regime is not at all farfetched.

According to revelations released by the DNI, “government officials conducted 30,355 searches in 2016 seeking information about Americans in NSA intercept metadata, which include telephone numbers and email addresses.
(Excerpt) Read more at thecoachsteam.com ...

Sacramento Allocates Taxpayer Money to Fight Illegal Immigrant Deportations! (AMAZING)

Washington Free Beacon ^ | May 6, 2017 | Sam Dorman 

The City Council in Sacramento, Calif. voted unanimously late Thursday to spend taxpayer money on services to help illegal immigrants fight deportation.

Guerra, who led a task force that proposed allocating the city's funds, justified the decision by pointing out that illegal immigrants often pay taxes and contribute to the economy.
(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...

Head of California high-speed rail project calls it quits!

SF Gate ^ | 21 April 2017 | Kurtis Alexander 

California’s $64 billion high-speed rail project said Friday that he’s stepping down after five years pushing forward a vision of 220-mph trains that still faces stiff resistance from lawmakers and the public.
Jeff Morales, 57, told The Chronicle that uncertainty over the project’s future had nothing to do with his resignation, only a genuine desire to move aside after breaking ground on the nation’s largest infrastructure project.

“We’ve made a tremendous amount of progress, from being at a standstill to having $3 billion-plus of construction under way,” he said. “Frankly, I didn’t think I’d be here for five years. I had no gray hair when I started the job. I have lots of it now.”

Morales, who sent his resignation letter to Gov. Jerry Brown on Friday, plans to remain chief executive officer of the California High Speed Rail Authority through June 2, long enough for his replacement to be found. The search for a successor has begun.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...

Manufacturing CEO Says He’s Investing $2 Billion in US Because of ‘Confidence in Trump’!

Washington Free Bacon ^ | 05/06/2017 | Andrew Kugle

Australian billionaire and manufacturing CEO Anthony Pratt said Friday on Fox Business that he is investing $2 billion in the United States because he has "confidence" in President Trump.

"We have enormous confidence in President Trump. He's doing a wonderful job, and we think he will continue to do a great job," Pratt said. "He's reducing unemployment. As we saw today, the job figures show unemployment is the lowest it's been for a decade, and he's supporting manufacturing."

"And that's why we are doubling down on our investment in the United States, creating 7,000 high-paying manufacturing jobs, mainly in the Midwest," Pratt added.

(Excerpt) Read more at freebeacon.com ...

Conway: 'Where the hell were those Democrats' when veterans waiting for care?

The Hill ^ | May 5, 2017 | Max Greenwood 

Senior White House aide Kellyanne Conway on Friday railed against Democrats criticizing the GOP plan to repeal and replace ObamaCare, suggesting they failed to put in the same effort during the 2014 Veterans Affairs wait-list scandal.
"Where the hell were those Democrats – excuse me – when veterans were dying waiting for care?" Conway said on Fox News.
"I didn't see them coming on TV with hosts that just sat there listening to them and their screed when there were veterans dying for care and deserve better."
Scandal erupted in the Veterans Health Administration in 2014 amid revelations of negligence and crushing wait times at VA facilities. The scandal prompted a White House investigation of the VA and legislation to reform the agency.
On the campaign trail, Trump repeatedly promised to improve veterans' healthcare and increase accountability within the department.
He signed an executive order late last month creating the Office of Accountability and Whistleblower Protection within the Department of Veterans Affairs, saying at the time that reforming the agency will be one of the "crown jewels" of his presidency.
Democrats have fiercely criticized the American Health Care Act, the GOP measure aimed at repealing large parts of former President Obama's signature healthcare law.
The House narrowly passed the bill on Thursday, sending it to the Senate, where Republicans have already vowed to make big changes.