Sunday, November 6, 2016

Dick Morris Predicts Landslide Win for Trump as Male Vote Grows

NewsMax ^ | November 5, 2016 | Dick Morris 

The latest Fox News poll, reported yesterday, shows Trump’s lead among white high school educated men is approaching landslide proportions. In the current poll, he leads Hillary among these voters by 41 points (61-20). One week ago, he led by 31 points (59-29) and two weeks ago, his lead was only 16 points (48-32). This huge swing in Trump’s vote — and the equivalent crash in Hillary’s vote — is moving the major industrial states of Michigan, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Wisconsin and Minnesota in Trump’s direction. By contrast, Hillary has made some gains among high school educated women where she now trails by 21 points (53-32) having been 27 points back (58-31) previously. Since downscale voters usually break at the very end — and they are breaking now for Trump — the strength of the trend is only now becoming visible. Morris is the author of the best-selling book "Armageddon: How Trump Can Beat Hillary," written with Eileen McGann and published by Humanix Books, available at Barnes & Noble and Amazon.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...

Clinton aide says Foundation paid for Chelsea’s wedding, WikiLeaks emails show!

FoxNews.com ^ | November 06, 2016 

Former President Bill Clinton’s top aide wrote in 2012 that Chelsea Clinton used Clinton Foundation resources “for her wedding and life for a decade” and a top Foundation donor was responsible for “killing” unfavorable press coverage – all as an internal Foundation audit uncovered numerous conflicts of interest and “quid pro quo benefits,” according to emails released Sunday by WikiLeaks.
Doug Band, founder of global strategies company Teneo and Bill Clinton’s personal assistant since the 1990s, wrote the Jan. 4, 2012, email to future Hillary Clinton presidential campaign chair John Podesta and two other Clinton aides after receiving word that Chelsea had told “one of the [President] bush 43 kids” and others about “an internal investigation of money within the foundation.” Band wrote such chatter was “not smart.”
“The investigation into her getting paid for campaigning, using foundation resources for her wedding and life for a decade, taxes on money from her parents….,” Band wrote. “I hope that you will speak to her and end this[.] Once we go down this road….”
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ..

Nate Silver: Clinton one state away from losing Electoral College

The Hill's Ballot Box Blog ^ | November 6, 2016 | Jessie Hellman 

Hillary Clinton is one state away from losing the presidential election, FiveThirtyEight's Nate Silver said Sunday.
While the Democratic presidential nominee has a 65.7 percent chance of winning the presidency on Tuesday, she is not "in a terribly safe position," the pollster said on ABC's "This Week." "The electoral map is actually less solid for Clinton than it was for Obama four years ago," Silver said.
Silver came to notoriety by correctly predicting President Obama's victories in 2008 and 2012.
Clinton is weaker among Midwestern voters, while Obama had leads in states like Ohio....
(Excerpt) Read more at thehill.com ...

The “experts” aren’t quite as certain of a Clinton presidency this weekend!

Hot Air ^ | November 6, 2016 | Jazz Shaw 

Are the expert election prognosticators seeing some signs in the chicken entrails which tell them that Donald Trump actually has a chance of being elected? I mean, only three weeks ago Charlie Cook was literally saying that the race was over. Clinton had not only already won, but she was probably going to have a landslide of historic proportions. But now, in the final 48 hours, some folks are changing their tune… at least a bit. (Washington Post)
With hours until Election Day, the wildest U.S. presidential race in memory has grown more competitive in most of the battleground states, although Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton continues to hold a broader path to victory than Republican Donald Trump.
The political map suggests that Clinton can lose several key states long assumed to be in her column and still reach the 270 electoral votes she needs to win.
Trump, meanwhile, has a new reason for optimism, as a growing number of states appear potentially within his grasp. But to win, he would have to take nearly all of them.
Yes, that’s still a dismal forecast for Trump, but it’s risen considerably above the Dumb and Dumber level of, so you’re telling me there’s a chance. That analysis came from Karen Tumulty at the Post, but she’s not the only one. Over at The Hill, Jonathan Easley sees a number of people who were already writing Trump’s political obituary setting their pens aside for a little while....
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...

People Not In Labor Force Surge By 425,000 To 94,609,000!

Zero Hedge ^ | 04 November 2016 | Tyler Durden 

On the surface, the establishment survey print of 161K jobs was just good enough when taking into account the 44,000 in upward revisions to August and September jobs. However, the household survey was less impressive, with the number of workers employed declining by 43,000 to 151,925 even as the number of persons unemployed declined from 7,939K to 7,787K.

So how did the unemployment rate drop? Because contrary to expectations that people are rushing back into the labor force, in October the number of Americans who were not in the labor force rose by a substantial 425,000 to 94,609, the highest print in the series since May, and suggests that the exodus of Americans out of the labor force has resumed.
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...

Can we Overthrow the Kelptocracy?

Freep | 11/6/2016 | CharlesOConnell 

Kleptocracy: A form of government in which corrupt rulers (kleptocrats) use their power to exploit the people and natural resources of their own territory in order to extend their personal wealth and political power. - Wikipedia.
Until now, the present generation of ultra-rich ruthlessly exploit the media disninformation technicians, the Winston Smiths, to bring billions under the sway of mass delusion.
But is there potential for the media to take advantage of their present idea hegemony, to stage a coup, to overthrow their masters? In past centuries, the was the concern with the Military. (You likely never heard that the ultra-rich almost overthrew the American government in the 1930s, the so-called Wall St. Plot; if they had succeeded, a military strong man would have succeeded FDR.) By the time you heard the braying of the left against a non-existent Military coup in Seven Days in May, it was a safe subject. (Imagine Gen. Curtis LeMay overthrowing the Ultra-Rich, America's 60 Families!)
But there are various strange emanations of the information sector overthrowing the Ultra-Rich. We think of Vladimir Putin as an intelligence strong-man, but his native class (warriors, priest-intellectuals, merchants, peasant-famers) is can be interpretetd as a Russian equivalent of the Fifth Estate.
In the West, William Randolph Hearst wielded his power through newspaper advertising.
In the East, information control of the political process only had short-term success under the Soviets with the dictatorship of Yuri Andropov.

But post-Soviet, the information sector achieved lasting power in the person of Vlad the lover of children, who famously overthrew various Oligarchs. (NY Times: There are no more Russian Oligarchs.)


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd2Z3nXnLD0
Is there any potential for the media to overthrow the Soros-Buffett-Gates axis in the American Banana Republic?

Who says we don’t fix problems? We’re sending John Kerry to Antarctica!

hotair.com ^ | 11/5/2016 | Jazz Shaw 

We don’t seem to be able to solve many problems these days with our divided, dysfunctional government, but by George we finally found somebody with a plan to figure out what to do with Secretary of State John Kerry. We’re sending him to the bottom of the world. (Free Beacon)

The real explanation, absent something better coming out of the State Department, is that this is nothing more than a very expensive photo op for Kerry. He has no need to be there for any scientific or policy reason, but this is clearly designed to promote climate change “awareness” and dredge up support for the non-ratified Paris climate treaty. If you need a quick layman’s translation of that it simply means a massive carbon tax and hugely expensive executive mandates for more renewable energy which doesn’t currently exist in economically feasible forms. But it sounds great in an election year, so away we go.
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...

How far will Dems go to steal Election 2016?

Canada Free Press ^ | 11/06/16 | Judi McLeod 

How far would Obama go to hang onto the power of a third term in the Oval Office through the election of Hillary Clinton?

America seems headed for a real life ‘Ruby Tuesday’ on November 8.

The events of Friday and Saturday should be sending chills down the spines of average citizens IF, as U.S. Intelligence is warning, al Qaeda strikes with terrorist attacks in three states tomorrow and ISIS follows through on its threats to slaughters voters going to the polls on Tuesday.

Did Obama Just Give Illegal Aliens the Green Light to Vote?

Canada Free Press ^ | 11/06/16 | Jerry Kane 

Obama said, if you’re an illegal alien and you vote, the federal government has no way to find you and it won’t even try to find you!

During a recent interview with Golden Globe-winning actress, Gina Rodriguez, Barack Hussein Obama appears to be telling illegal aliens that the federal government won’t track them or deport them if they vote in this year’s general election.

Rodriguez and Obama appear to have artfully crafted an indirect message telling illegal aliens that they have nothing to fear if they go out and vote.

Leaked Email Exposes Hillary's Campaign Paying For Bill Clinton's Legal Fees!

Zerohedge ^ | Nov 5, 2016 4:20 PM 

Today's latest WikiLeaks dump reveals yet another startling revelation which may add to Hillary's growing list of alleged federal crimes. It begins with the following email from Eric Kleinfeld, of the law firm Utrecht, Kleinfeld, Fiori, Zeglis & Partners, sent to Cheryl Mills on April 15, 2015. At first glance, the email seems fairly innocuous with Kleinfeld simply seeking legal payment for services rendered for March 1, 2014 - March 31, 2015.



That said, we noticed some red flags when we looked a little deeper at the line item details of the invoice. Out of the total ~$340,000 of charges, just over $83,000 appears to be related to work done for Bill Clinton and the Clinton Foundation.


(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...

Nostradamus: Election 2016 (Trump wins!)

History Channel ^ | 11/6/2016 | History Channel 

The Nostradamus predictions 2016 talk of a “false trumpet” that will “cause Byzantium to change its laws”.


Also, it talks of a “man who wants the edict withdrawn, changing money and standards”. Believers have pointed out that the trumpet refers to Trump who is a highly controversial businessman turned political aspirant.


There are several references to broken agreements in the passage. These may refer to Trump’s wish to end several treaties and also “the wall”. The latter refers to Trump’s desire to build a wall at the border between Mexico and the United States

Clinton amnesty tax: $15,000 per household, $1.2 trillion

Washington Examiner ^ | Nov 5, 2016 | Paul Bedard 

Amnesty for illegal immigrants like a program proposed by Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton would require an immediate tax hike of $1.2 trillion, a $15,000 hit on every household in America, according to a new analysis of immigration reform.

The authoritative National Academy of Sciences said the cost to give some 11 million illegals citizenship rights would be staggering, though it suggested long-term benefits.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonexaminer.com ...

Libs Gone Insane: Slate’s ‘Trump Apocalypse Watch’

NewsBusters.org ^ | November 4, 2016 | Dan Gainor 

Editor’s Note: Normal people might find some of this offensive. (We hope. Dear Lord, please!)


The end is nigh.

No, not the end of all things. Heck, not even the end of the World Series, which concluded the other night. Just the end of the 2016 election. Maybe.

Assuming one of our candidates can pull out a win on Tuesday, then someone presses a button and the whole insanity starts over once again. Before we congratulate President __________ or note how honorable/bitter his/her rival was, let’s look back on how crazy this election really was.

For starters, this was the most biased election since journalists first crawled out of the slime and then dove back in. Journalists and pundits have used tons of euphemisms to describe 2016, but “dumpster fire” resonates. They simply won’t admit that the term applies to what they did as well.

Journalists have served not as reporters but as extensions of the left’s communications operation. Every single thing Trump and other conservatives or Republicans (News flash: The two are not the same.) have done is bad in the eyes of the media. Everything liberals/Democrats have done is a default good.

A great example of this is The Atlantic’s latest piece, with the headline: “Why Is Hillary So Widely Loved?” Clinton has her supporters, granted, but “widely loved” is hardly an accurate description. But Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie shows how far you can take a rationalization. (Note: The story version here has a new headline because this was widely mocked.)

And Trump has become an extra special case. Everything he does much be described in the most apocalyptic of terms. And yes, I mean “real wrath of God-type stuff” including “dogs and cats living together.”
Editor’s Note: Normal people might find some of this offensive. (We hope. Dear Lord, please!)

The end is nigh.

No, not the end of all things. Heck, not even the end of the World Series, which concluded the other night. Just the end of the 2016 election. Maybe.

Assuming one of our candidates can pull out a win on Tuesday, then someone presses a button and the whole insanity starts over once again. Before we congratulate President __________ or note how honorable/bitter his/her rival was, let’s look back on how crazy this election really was.

For starters, this was the most biased election since journalists first crawled out of the slime and then dove back in. Journalists and pundits have used tons of euphemisms to describe 2016, but “dumpster fire” resonates. They simply won’t admit that the term applies to what they did as well.

Journalists have served not as reporters but as extensions of the left’s communications operation. Every single thing Trump and other conservatives or Republicans (News flash: The two are not the same.) have done is bad in the eyes of the media. Everything liberals/Democrats have done is a default good.

A great example of this is The Atlantic’s latest piece, with the headline: “Why Is Hillary So Widely Loved?” Clinton has her supporters, granted, but “widely loved” is hardly an accurate description. But Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie shows how far you can take a rationalization. (Note: The story version here has a new headline because this was widely mocked.)

And Trump has become an extra special case. Everything he does much be described in the most apocalyptic of terms. And yes, I mean “real wrath of God-type stuff” including “dogs and cats living together.”
Is An ‘Apocalypse Watch’ Better Than A Rolex?: Salon and Fusion are usually the go-to sites for Ghostbusters-level “mass hysteria.” But leave it to the lefty lords at Slate to make their mark in one of their more stupid ways. In an attempt to be edgy (always the goal of cool publications), Slate created a daily “Apocalypse Watch” that measured the danger of Trump in the numbers of horsemen from the apocalypse. To give a sense of the site’s worldview, here’s an actual quote: “This was not a good day for Hillary Clinton or the world’s prospects of keeping the nuclear button out of the hands of Donald Trump.” (Bolding their own.) Those of us who are old remember fun times when journalists (OK, that doesn’t include Slate) wanted to report on the news, not decide who deserved to win. Actual quote: “The Trump Apocalypse Watch is a subjective daily estimate, using a scale of one to four horsemen, of how likely it is that Donald Trump will be elected president, thus triggering an apocalypse in which we all die.” If anybody other than lefty tools read Slate, people would probably be chanting “Slate sucks” instead of CNN.

Why Won’t Funny Or Die Live Up To It’s Name?: Creating fun, viral videos is tough. Human attention spans are short and humor is very subjective. The Funny Or Die folks make a pretty heady promise, yet fail to deliver. In one of the site’s biggest failures, they brought together would-be comedian Lena Dunham, rap, stripping and a pro-Clinton theme. The media’s former “It” girl (replaced by equally talentless/humorless Amy Schumer) loves taking off her clothes to get attention. She thinks that societal revulsion to that act will drive clicks. In reality, our revulsion is to who she is as a person and the “art” she has created like the twisted show Girls. Still, Hollywood stars will do just about anything to get Hillary elected: raise money, perform on stage with her, write TV plots to support her and even take off their clothes. Bear in mind, Dunham has vowed to move to Canada if Trump wins the election. Hence her stripping to her “sensual pantsuit.” Actual quote: “She’s a strong ass fucking person, Couldn’t even walk a mile in the heels of this woman, Had to fight her life defending everything she does to the left and to the right.” Remember, liberals think stripping is empowering to women, unless you want to watch, in which case you are objectifying them.

Tour for the First Time: Inside Bill Clinton Pal's 'Lolita Express'-the Pedophile Billionaire's jet!

Radar Online ^ | 7-11-16 | Radar Staff 

Before Bill and Hillary Clinton crisscrossed the country wrangling votes for her presidential campaign, the potential First Lady was a frequent flier on one of the most notorious jets to soar the not-so-friendly skies.

Billionaire pedophile Jeffrey Epstein hosted Bill most than 11 times on his "Lolita Express" orgy plane, and for the first time ever, RadarOnline.com has a secret glimpse inside!

http://radaronline.com/photos/tour-for-the-first-time-inside-bill-clinton-pals-lolita-express-the-pedophile-billionaires-sex-jet-he-flew-on-11-times/

(Excerpt) Read more at radaronline.com ...

Leaked Clinton Foundation "Smoking Gun" Memo Admits It Was Breaking The Law

ZeroHedge.com ^ | 5 Nov 2016 | Tyler Durden 

While there are conflicting reports whether the FBI may or may not indict the Clinton Foundation, which as the WSJ reported last week is being investigated by various FBI teams, even as other parts of the Bureau - and the DOJ - seek to squash the probe, the latest dump of Podesta emails has revealed a critical, confidential memo from prominent New York lawyer Kumiki Gibson to Clinton Foundation Chairman Bruce Lindsey (and former Bill Clinton attorney) which was performed as part of an inside audit of the foundation, and confirms that the charitable organization (which it found "operates more like a political operation") was engaged in practices that broke the law.

The summary reveals serious reservations about the viability of the foundation - which "operates more like a political operation" than a "professional, strategic, and sustainable corporation committed to advancing its overall mission" - if and when Bill Clinton were to depart and "the Foundation has to rise and/or fall on its own name and work only."
...
Among the policies and procedures that Gibson found missing or inadequate at the Foundation were the following, some of which - such as the procedures the CF was utilizing in Harlem - may be in violation of the law. Here is a brief sample of the findings:
...
And many more.
Furthermore, and more troubling, the review pointed to a high-ranking but unnamed foundation executive who was “being paid by [President Clinton], the government and the foundation” who “allowed the foundation to host what may have been (or may have been viewed as) a political event, apparently without official pre-approval from the foundation’s legal department and without regard, before the fact, to the impact of that decision on the foundation’s tax exempt status.”
(Excerpt) Read more at zerohedge.com ...

Opinion: Why Mexican American Men Will Not Vote For Hillary Clinton (or Black men)

FOX NEWS ^ | 5-6-14 | Raoul Lowery Contreras 

Hispanic men will not vote for Hillary Clinton for President.

Specifically: Mexican American men will not vote for Hillary Clinton for President. They might vote for her in a primary because of possible lack of any macho Democrat to run against her for the nomination, but it is not imaginable that the Mexican American men of California, Texas, New Mexico, Nevada and Colorado could vote for her.

(Excerpt) Read more at latino.foxnews.com ...

Support for "Assault Rifles" Ban at all time Low Gallup

Gun Watch ^ | 29 October, 2016 | Dean Weingarten 

Gallop released results of a poll taken on the 5-9 of October, 2016.  The last time they had asked the question was in 2012.   Support for a ban is the lowest it has ever been, since the question was first asked.

I am not surprised at the drop.  It indicates that the population is becoming more educated about crime and "assault rifles".  Gallup notes that the drop in support for an "assault rifle" ban correlates with a general decline in trust in the government.

Historically, people who own guns have been far, far less in favor of placing more infringements on the Second Amendment.  Many assume this is because they reasonably oppose more regulation on their activities, while people who do not own guns show a "free rider" effect.  More regulation of something that you do not have does not impose an obvious and immediate personal cost to you.  Part of what we are seeing is due to a significant rise in gun ownership, especially ownership of the rifles mentioned.  Many millions have been sold in the period covered by the graph.

An often overlooked explanation of why gun owners oppose more gun restrictions is seldom mentioned, but obvious, once considered.  Gun owners know more about the subject than non-gun owners.

Unfortunately, Gallup has never asked a "calibration" question to determine the knowledge of the facts by the people answering.  I would like to see a question by Gallup such as "How many people are murdered with rifles in a given year?"

There could be multiple answers:  30,000, 10,000 3,000,  1,000  300  100  10.  Then the closeness to the correct answer (300) could be used to see whether people who were more or less informed responded to the desirability of a ban.

Bans on ownership of firearms have always been driven by people who are ignorant of guns.  It is why the bans on guns in England and Australia were able to be put in place in democratic countries.  The large majority of people in those countries did not own guns and were ignorant of them.  This is a major reason the drive for more infringements on the Second Amendment is failing in the United States.  As a wealthy society, guns are more affordable for more people than ever before.  Nearly a hundred million guns have been added to the private stock during the Obama administration.  That is a 30 percent increase in eight years.

In spite of ambiguous surveys that show rapid drops (and increases) in gun ownership, other indicators show a strong and growing population of gun owners.   The number of individual people who admit to being gun owners in this Gallup poll was 29%.  That is not households, but individuals.  The number has varied from 27% to 34% over the last 12 polls and 17 years.  The lowest was at the first poll in 2000 and in 2013; the highest in 2011.  About one third of people say that they would not tell  a pollster if they had a gun, which would indicate the gun owning percent of the population is near 44%.  The gallop question does not allow for an answer of more than one gun owner in a household.

Indicators such as increasing gun ownership among minorities and women, as well as skyrocketing gun carry permits and gun sales, suggest ownership is much higher than is shown in the surveys.

We do not know how many gun owners there are in the United States; but increasing gun ownership, and knowledge about guns, can explain much of the drop in support for gun bans.

©2016 by Dean Weingarten: Permission to share is granted when this notice is included.
Link to Gun Watch

Watch the "White" States on Election Day

Wikipedia ^ | 11-5-16 

Trump will increase the share of the White vote over 2012 levels.*

* Battleground & near battleground states with the highest percentage of Whites that will be significantly affected on Election Day.

Non-Hispanic White Population % By State:

1. Vermont 94.0%
2. *Maine 93.9%
3. West Virginia 92.6%
4. *New Hampshire 91.4%
5. *Iowa 87.5%
6. North Dakota 87.4%
7. Montana 87.0%
8. Kentucky 85.7%
9. Montana 84.7%
10. South Dakota 83.4%
11. Idaho 83.2%
12. *Wisconsin 82.5%
13. *Minnesota 81.9%
14. Nebraska 81.0%
15. Indiana 80.6%
16. Missouri 80.4%
17. *Ohio 80.3%
18. Utah 79.5%
19. *Pennsylvania 78.2%
20. *Oregon 77.3%
21. Kansas 77.1%
22. *Michigan 75.9%
23. Tennessee 74.8%
24. Massachusetts 74.6%
25. Rhode Island 74.6%
26. Arkansas 73.6%
27. Washington 70.9%
28. Connecticut 69.3%
29. *Colorado 69.1%
30. Oklahoma 67.4%
31. Alabama 66.3%
32. *North Carolina 64.2%
33. Delaware 64.0%
34. South Carolina 63.8%
35. *Virginia 63.5%
36. Illinois 62.7%
37. Alaska 62.5%
38. Louisiana 59.5%
39. Mississippi 57.4%
40. New Jersey 57.3%
41. New York 56.9%
42. Arizona 56.6%
43. Florida 56.2%
44. Georgia 54.6%
45. Maryland 53.2%
46. Nevada 52.1%
47. Texas 43.9%
48. New Mexico 39.3%
49. California 38.8%
50. District of Columbia 35.6%
51. Hawaii 23.0%
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_U.S._states_by_non-Hispanic_white_population

Few Benefits to Daylight Saving Time—Should We Scrap It?

newsweek ^ 

Changing our clocks does not create extra daylight. DST simply shifts when the sun rises and sets relative to our society’s regular schedule and routines. The key question, then, is how people respond to this enforced shift in natural lighting. Most people have to be at work at a certain time—say, 8:30 a.m.—and if that time comes an hour earlier, they simply get up an hour earlier. The effect on society is another question, and there, the research shows DST is more burden than boon.
...
To this day, our laws equate daylight saving with energy conservation. However, recent research suggests that DST actually increases energy use.
The largest effects occurred in the summer, when DST aligns our lives with the hottest part of the day, so people tend to use more air conditioning, and late fall, when we wake up in the dark and use more heating with no reduction in lighting needs.
...
When we “spring forward” in March we lose an hour, which comes disproportionately from resting hours rather than wakeful time. Therefore, many problems associated with springing forward stem from sleep deprivation.
...
Even when we gain that hour back in the fall, we must readjust our routines over several days because the sun and our alarm clocks feel out of synchronization.
...
purred by many of these arguments, several states are considering unilaterally discontinuing DST. The California State Legislature considered a bill this term that would have asked voters to decide whether or not to remain on Pacific Standard Time year-round (the measure was passed by the State Assembly but rejected by the Senate).
On the East Coast, Massachusetts has commissioned research on the impacts of dropping DST and joining Canada’s Maritime provinces on Atlantic Time, which is one hour ahead of Eastern Standard Time.
(Excerpt) Read more at newsweek.com ...

Hillary's 'Lesbian Relationships' EXPOSED: Bill's Lover Tells All

Radaronline.com ^ | 10-21-16 | Sharon Churcher 

Bill Clinton told his longtime mistress that he got Hillary pregnant to “take attention” away from the Democratic Presidential candidate’s lesbian “lifestyle!”


That’s the explosive claim of beautiful blonde lawyer Dolly Kyle, who was Bill’s lover for 17 years and has now written a tell-all about their time together, Hillary: The Other Woman.

http://radaronline.com/celebrity-news/hillary-clinton-lesbian-claims-dolly-kyle-tell-all/

(Excerpt) Read more at radaronline.com ...

Bill Clinton's longtime lover reveals how he called ruthless Hillary 'The Warden'!

Daily Mail.com ^ | 10-26-16 | Alana Goodman 

Bill Clinton is a sex-addicted 'monster' who mocked Hillary Clinton by calling her 'The Warden' in front of friends and privately boasted about his high notch count, according to his long-time mistress and childhood friend Dolly Kyle.
Kyle, now 68, says she had a decades-long affair with the former president before and during his marriage and had a front-row seat to Bill's salacious double-life in the 1970s and '80s.

Read more: http://www.daily mail.co.uk/news/article-3871482/Bill-Clinton-s-long-time-lover-reveals-called-ruthless-Hillary-Warden-bemoaned-sex-life-woman-greasy-hair-BO-wanted-baby-dispel-rampant-lesbian-rumors.html
(Excerpt) Read more at dailymail.co.uk ...

Pollster John Zogby sees shades of 2012 race — in reverse; trend could be bad sign for Clinton!

Washington Times ^ | 6 Nov 2016 | Ralph Z Hallow 

Veteran pollster John Zogby sent out an “Uh-oh” alert Saturday night noting that heading into Sunday, two key voting groups that had shifted toward Barack Obama by the Saturday before the 2012 election — and that gave him his landslide victory — were not moving Democrat Hillary Clinton’s way four days before Tuesday’s election.
“The two groups were 18-29 year olds and self-identified members of the ‘Creative Class’ were clearly moving in the president’s direction both nationwide and in the battleground states,” he said.
But here’s what Mr. Zogby sees as of Saturday night:
“After serious doubts expressed among mainstream and traditional conservative Republicans about nominee Donald Trump, it looks like he is polling about 90 percent of self-identified Republicans, exactly where a party standard-bearer needs to be.”
Second, young African Americans “are not quite in Clinton’s Camp – this is a serious cause for concern among supporters of Mrs. Clinton.
Snip

Sure it’s huge, said Mr. Zogby, but it also means that 15 percent are still not sure about her or are supporting someone else.
“When I see African Americans who are undecided, especially this late in the game, it tells me that they are not going to vote,” Mr. Zogby says.
snip
More alarming for Mrs. Clinton is evidence that millennials may stay home.
About one in five young voters are still undecided. Mr. Zogby notes “they were the key group, especially young women, who put Mr. Obama over the top in 2012. We are still not sure if they are going to even vote. We do know they will not support Mr. Trump, but Mrs. Clinton is still polling around 50 percent of 18-29 year olds and many are telling pollsters and reporters that she represents the Establishment, something they reject.”
(Excerpt) Read more at m.washingtontimes.com ...

Just How Corrupt Is the Obama-Clinton Justice Department?

Hayride ^ | 11-4-16 | MACAOIDH, Scott McKay 

If you’ve been following along with the saga of Hillary’s various scandals and FBI investigations, you’ve probably heard stories about the Justice Department thwarting the FBI’s attempts to secure indictments or at least empanel grand juries in the case of both her e-mail server and the Clinton Foundation.
Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General, and her employees both at Main Justice and in the Eastern District of New York, where she was U.S. Attorney before succeeding Eric Holder in her current job doesn’t come out overly well in those reports.
And the Justice Department doesn’t look any better the more we hear about the Anthony Weiner case and the New York Police Department’s involvement in it. Because it was NYPD who first made a move on Weiner, and it’s NYPD from which the leaks have begun to come in terms of what’s on the laptop computer Weiner turned over to law enforcement.

https://thehayride.com/2016/11/the-battlefield-november-4-2016-just-how-corrupt-is-the-obama-clinton-justice-department/

(Excerpt) Read more at thehayride.com ...

Here’s how the impending ObamaCare disaster affects you

NY Post ^ | 11/1/2016 | Betsy McCaughey 

“Disaster” sums up the skyrocketing premiums and lack of choice facing many of the 11 million people enrolled in the exchange plans. The plans are unaffordable, unless you’re a low earner getting a free ride.
ObamaCare enrollees aren’t the only people being clobbered. If you get insured at work — as 155 million people do — your deductibles are up a staggering 49 percent since 2011 thanks to ObamaCare. Part-timers are working fewer hours, so business owners can avoid the law’s employer mandate. Taxpayers are on the hook for some 50 new taxes.
Seniors get hit the hardest. More than half of ObamaCare’s costs are paid for by cutting Medicare, resulting in stingy care for seniors.
[snip]
Clinton promises voters that she’ll make ObamaCare better with billions of dollars of extra spending. But she’s not going to remove the mandates causing people to lose work hours or their jobs. As for the regulations suffocating doctors, count on Hillary to pile on more.
Worst of all, Clinton wants to expand Medicare to people in their 50s. Seniors are already having a hard time finding a doctor to treat them for Medicare’s low rates. Adding millions of “50-somethings” trying to see the same doctors will make it impossible to get an appointment.
(Excerpt) Read more at nypost.com ...

Window Art