Thursday, September 15, 2016

First female soldier in Green Beret training fails to complete the course (not GI Jane)!

 Washington Times ^ | September 14, 2016 | Alex Quade 

The first female soldier to participate in the Army’s initial training program for the Green Berets — side-by-side with men — has failed to complete the course this week, The Washington Times has learned.

The enlisted soldier is the first woman to attend the U.S. Army Special Forces Assessment and Selection (SFAS), the first step toward earning the Special Forces tab and the coveted Green Beret.

The Times reported in July that two female officer candidates have been accepted to attend an SFAS class that begins in the spring.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

When are we going to ask Chelsea about her father “still dicking bimbos at home”?

Flopping Aces ^ | 09-15-16 | DrJohn 

Desperate to smother the issue of Hillary Clinton's physical debilitation and her "deplorables" remarks the media has take to slapping Ivanka Trump around with past quotes from her father.
Interview implosions are not specific to cable news. Sometimes, they happen in print. In fact, when they do, it’s almost more shocking. Here’s a good example.Ivanka Trump has been really, really pushing her big pet project, paid maternity leave, for a while now. She even got her father, Republican presidential nominee Donald Trumpon-board. One major step in pushing her agenda has been media appearances. This morning on Good Morning America, she delightedly talked about how employees of the Trump Organization enjoy paid leave already. That got thoroughly debunked by the Huffington Post, but her one-woman campaign to talk about maternity leave with big outlets soldiered on.
Well, OK, but it's also time for someone to ask Chelsea Clinton some questions about her father. Chelsea has already stated that she's never seen her mother, who she first describes as "infatiguable", as tired as she is now. Not sure I know how an infatiguable person can get tired. Anyway, there are a few questions that Chelsea really ought to answer.
One- your Mom said every victim of sexual assault needs to be believed. Do you believe Juanita Broaddrick when she said she was raped by your father? Do you believe the witness who described what she saw that day?
“She was crying,” recalled Norma Rogers, a nurse who worked for Broaddrick, who at the time was a nursing home administrator volunteering for then-Arkansas Attorney General Bill Clinton’s 1978 gubernatorial bid.“And the thing I think I remember most is that her mouth was all swollen up. It was cut. … Her pantyhose were all ripped,” Rogers stated in dramatic, lengthy new testimony.
Rogers drove Broaddrick back home after the incident. This week, she recounted that emotional drive. “I think we stopped at least twice to get ice. I would go up and get fresh ice and put it on her mouth because she was trying to keep her face from bruising and looking like something bad had happened to her, you know. It was just crazy. The whole situation was just crazy.”
Second- do you think your father is "still d*cking bimbos at home"? Colin Powell is highly respected by democrats.
Colin Powell wrote in a stunning email that he doesn’t want “to vote for her” — an apparent reference to Hillary Clinton — in part because her husband is “still d—ing bimbos at home,” according to the hacker website DCLeaks.“I would rather not have to vote for her, although she is a friend I respect,” Powell told Democratic donor Jeffrey Leeds in the email leaked on the site.
“A 70-year person with a long track record, unbridled ambition, greedy, not transformational, with a husband still d—ing bimbos at home (according to the NYP),” Powell added.
The email appears to be a reference to Hillary Clinton — and her husband, former President Bill Clinton.
The July 26, 2014, email came just days after The Post, which Powell appears to cite, reported: “Bill Clinton reportedly has a buxom blond mistress who visits so often when Hillary Clinton isn’t home in Chappaqua that the former president’s Secret Service detail have given her an unofficial code name: Energizer.”
Third- Do you think Monica Lewinski is, as your mother suggested, a "narcissistic looney tune"?
Fourth- Colin Powell described your mother this way:
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Donald Trump's odds of winning are at their highest point in weeks! ^ | 9/15/16 

Renowned statistician Nate Silver's election forecast on Wednesday gave Donald Trump his best odds of winning since late July. In Silver's "polls-plus" model, the Republican nominee had a 34.7% chance of winning in November. Democratic nominee Hillary Clinton was sitting at a 65.3% chance of victory.

But the model showed the Electoral College projection tightening significantly. Silver's model had Trump as more likely to win Florida, North Carolina, Iowa, and Ohio, the latter of which has voted in step with the nation in every election since 1964. Clinton, in Silver's model, held a 294.2 to 243.6 edge in the Electoral College projection.

A total of 270 electoral votes are needed to secure the presidency. The model also showed Clinton with a slim 47% to 44.5% edge in the popular vote, with Libertarian Party nominee Gary Johnson receiving 7.2% of the vote. The last time Trump was above 35% in the model was July 31, when Silver's forecast showed Trump with a 39.1% chance of winning the presidency.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Hillary Lies, Says Benghazi Station Chief Hicks

American Thinker ^ | September 15, 2016 | Daniel John Sobieski 

One wonders if Hillary Clinton will call Gregory Hicks a liar, just as she has called Benghazi parents Patricia Smith and Charles Woods liars for their testimony that she blamed the terrorist attack on an Internet video in front of their son’s caskets as their bodies were brought home.

Hicks, a 25-year Foreign Service Office and former chief of station in Libya at the time of the Benghazi attack, gave riveting and damning testimony before Congress on Hillary’s lies and criminal negligence in the matter.

The last man to speak to Ambassador Christopher Stevens, he has exposed the video lie, documented how he told Hillary’s State Department what was happening in real time that fateful night, and how her State Department ignored warnings from Stevens and others about the gathering terrorist storm and the woeful lack of security.

Now retired, private citizen Hicks goes farther, telling Fox News that Hillary Clinton broke laws while condemning four Americans to death at the hands of terrorists:
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

"‘Hillary Clinton has 1 Year to Live,’ says Medical School Professor”

The Coach's Team ^ | 9/15/16 | Medical School Professor 

The far left will stop at nothing in its efforts to advance a global agenda which will destroy the United States, end free enterprise and individual liberty and obliterate national boundaries throughout the world.
Key to their success is unfettered control of the politics, economy and culture of the United States.

A medical school professor believes that the symptoms Hillary has displayed make it quite likely that she has just one year to live. If this is indeed the case, it means that thief, liar and radical leftist Hillary Clinton is willing to conceal her health problems and literally place a corpse in the White House, all for the purpose of ensuring the left will own the critically important Executive Branch.

Click here to watch the very revealing video:

Congenital Liar ^ | September 15, 2016 | Cal Thomas 

In 1996, The New York Times columnist William Safire diagnosed Hillary Clinton's real problem. He called her a "congenital liar."
Congenital is defined as "having by nature a specified character."
Following Hillary Clinton's health scare Sunday in New York, we may have reached the conclusion author Mary McCarthy did when speaking of playwright Lillian Hellman: "Every word [Hellman] writes is a lie, including 'and' and 'the'."
A person's character is a clue to the entire person and both Clintons have displayed over many years severe character deficiencies. Abraham Lincoln said, "Nearly all men can stand adversity, but if you want to test a man's character, give him power."
Or her.
Hillary Clinton has had power as first lady, U.S. senator and secretary of state, now she wants to achieve the ultimate in power, the presidency of the United States. Along this road we have seen her record and it is a trail of cover-ups, misstatements, dissemblings, half-truths and outright lies. It is increasingly difficult to give her the benefit of the doubt on anything because doubt would imply there might be some reason to believe that at least some of the things she says are true.
The perception is always that she is hiding something, which, if discovered, might harm her chances of winning the White House. But, from the inconsequential to the substantive, Hillary Clinton is about as transparent as lead.
Her weak-kneed near collapse is just the latest example. Diagnosed last Friday with pneumonia, her campaign blamed her recent coughing fits on seasonal allergies. When a video shot by a bystander at the 9-11 memorial service showed her supported by Secret Service agents as she stumbled and was helped into a van, she disappeared for 90 minutes with no press allowed to follow her.
Most people would regard such an incident as worthy of a trip to the hospital, possibly the emergency room, but as The New York Post reported, Hillary's aides took her to daughter Chelsea's apartment instead because they wanted to "keep the details of her medical treatment under wraps."
Transparency is the key to credibility, but in Hillary Clinton's case she and her handlers want us to believe the facade.
The campaign says it will release more medical records later in the week, but who believes these will tell the entire story? Maybe the records will be like those emails, which she claimed at various times to have released. She said she released all of them. This was not the truth.
This is the challenge when it comes to character. Think of people you know who have consistently lied to you. Would you trust them to pay back a loan? Would you let them baby-sit your kids? Would you trust them as president of the United States?
Some Democrats are becoming increasingly concerned about Hillary Clinton's health and credibility. Former Democratic National Committee Chairman Don Fowler wants the DNC to identify a potential backup candidate should Hillary Clinton be forced to leave the race.
Fowler told Politico, "Now is the time for all good political leaders to come to the aid of their party," adding, "the plan should be developed by 6 o'clock this afternoon."
The hour for such a decision may be long past six o'clock. For the Democrats, for Hillary Clinton and for the coming election less than 60 days away, it may be approaching midnight.

What Hypocrisy! Mexico Announces Plans for GREAT WALL on Southern Border with Central America!

The Gateway Pundit ^ | Sep 15th, 2016 | Jim Hoft 

Evidently, Donald Trump had a huge impact on Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto during his visit to Mexico City in August.

Mexican officialss are talking about building a great wall on its southern border with Central America.
The Daily Mail reported:
It seems Mexico agrees with Donald Trump’s plans to build a wall to keep out illegal immigrants – but only on its southern border with Central America.
Mexicans are calling for the border wall to keep out Guatemalans, Salvadorans and Hondurans fleeing violence in their own countries.
They complain ‘hordes’ of immigrants pass through on their way to the United States -who are then simply deported back to Mexico rather than their home countries by the US.
Central American migrants are left stuck in border cities with Mexican officials unable to afford to send them back to their own countries, according to an article by one of the largest newspapers in the border state of Tamaulipas, El Mañana, titled: ‘Yes to the Border Wall … but in Mexico’s South.’
The real estate mogul sparked international outrage last year when he unveiled his idea for a giant wall on the US border with Mexico – which he claimed Mexico would pay for.
But while Mexican President Enrique Peña Nieto has mocked Trump’s plans, many Mexicans praised the concept of a border wall.
‘Trump’s idea of a border wall is a good one but it should be on the southern border with Central America in order to stop the flow of Central Americans from entering both countries,’ the El Mañana board wrote in July.
RAAAAACISTS!! ==> Mexico wants to build a border wall with Central America to keep out illegal immigrants

Al-Qaeda Calls On Black Community to Become Jihadis (better buy more guns)

The Clari on Projest ^ | September 14, 2016 | Elliot Friedland 

Al-Qaeda used a 9/11 video message to call on the black community in America to convert to Islam, citing their history of oppression at the hands of the white majority.

Al-Qaeda chief Ayman al-Zawahiri said in the film:

“We inform every weakened [person] in the world: America is the source of calamity and the head of evil in this world, and it is the thief of nations’ ailment, and it is the one who humiliates the Africans [i.e. African Americans] until this day, and no matter how much they try to reform and obtain their rights according to the law and the [U.S.] Constitution, they will not attain it, for the law is in the hands of the white majority, [who] control it as they wish. And they [i.e. African Americans] will not be saved but by Islam.”
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

How Trump Could Win The White House While Losing The Popular Vote

FiveThirtyEight ^ | September 15, 2016 | David Wasserman 

...there is an unusually high chance Donald Trump could win the Electoral College while losing the popular vote — basically, Democrats’ version of the apocalypse.
Here’s why: Several of Trump’s worst demographic groups happen to be concentrated in states, such as California, New York, Texas and Utah, that are either not competitive or that aren’t on Trump’s must-win list. Conversely, whites without a college degree — one of Trump’s strongest groups — represent a huge bloc in three blue states he would need to turn red to have the best chance of winning 270 electoral votes: Florida, Ohio and Pennsylvania....
Using a prototype of a demographic election calculator that FiveThirtyEight will be unveiling in the next few weeks, I decided to simulate a few election scenarios. Starting with 2012 results as a baseline and adjusting for demographic changes over the past four years, I tested what the map would look like if African-American turnout dipped, GOP support among college-educated whites and Latinos slightly declined, and noncollege whites rallied to Trump in large numbers....
The result? Clinton would carry the popular vote by 1.5 percentage points. However, Trump would win the Electoral College with 280 votes by holding all 24 Romney states and flipping Florida, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Iowa and Maine’s 2nd Congressional District from blue to red. And the real disparity between the electoral and popular votes could be larger, because this model doesn’t even factor in Trump’s Mormon problem.
Don’t get me wrong: This scenario is still very unlikely. But its potential to plunge an already fraught election into absolute chaos means it shouldn’t be discounted, either.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

White House threatens veto of Guantanamo bill

The Hill ^ | 09/13/16 | Rebecca Kheel 

The Obama administration is threatening to veto a House bill that would prohibit all transfers out of the Guantanamo Bay detention facility.
The veto threat, in the form of a statement of administration policy, reiterates the administration’s longstanding argument that closing the facility would improve national security. It says detainee transfers to foreign countries happen only after a comprehensive review process.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

What Is the FBI Hiding? ^ | September 15, 2016 | Judge Andrew Napolitano 

Earlier this week, Republican leaders in both houses of Congress took the FBI to task for its failure to be transparent. In the House, it was apparently necessary to serve a subpoena on an FBI agent to obtain what members of Congress want to see; and in the Senate, the chairman of the Judiciary Committee accused the FBI itself of lawbreaking.
Here is the back story.
Ever since FBI Director James Comey announced on July 5 he was recommending that the Department of Justice not seek charges against former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as a result of her failure to safeguard state secrets during her time in office, many in Congress have had a nagging feeling that this was a political, not a legal, decision. The publicly known evidence of Clinton's recklessness and willful failure to safeguard secrets was overwhelming. The evidence of her lying under oath about whether she returned all her work-related emails that she had taken from the State Department was profound and incontrovertible.
And then we learned that people who worked for Clinton were instructed to destroy several of her mobile devices and to remove permanently the stored emails on one of her servers. All this was done after these items had been subpoenaed by two committees of the House of Representatives.
Yet the FBI -- which knew of the post-subpoena destruction of evidence and which acknowledged that Clinton failed to return thousands of her work-related emails as she had been ordered by a federal judge to do, notwithstanding at least three of her assertions to the contrary while under oath -- chose to overlook the evidence of not only espionage but also obstruction of justice, tampering with evidence, perjury and misleading Congress.
As if to defend itself in the face of this most un-FBI-like behavior, the FBI then released to the public selected portions of its work product, which purported to back up its decision to recommend against the prosecution of Clinton. Normally, the FBI gathers evidence and works with federal prosecutors and federal grand juries to build cases against targets in criminal probes, and its recommendations to prosecutors are confidential.
But in Clinton's case, the hierarchy of the Department of Justice removed itself from the chain of command because of the orchestrated impropriety of Attorney General Loretta Lynch and Bill Clinton, who met in private on the attorney general's plane at a time when both Bill and Hillary Clinton were subjects of FBI criminal investigations. That left the FBI to have the final say about prosecution -- or so the FBI and the DOJ would have us all believe.
It is hard to believe that the FBI was free to do its work, and it is probably true that the FBI was restrained by the White House early on. There were numerous aberrations in the investigation. There was no grand jury; no subpoenas were issued; no search warrants were served. Two people claimed to have received immunity, yet the statutory prerequisite for immunity -- giving testimony before a grand or trial jury -- was never present.
Because many members of Congress do not believe that the FBI acted free of political interference, they demanded to see the full FBI files in the case, not just the selected portions of the files that the FBI had released. In the case of the House, the FBI declined to surrender its files, and the agent it sent to testify about them declined to reveal their contents. This led to a dramatic service of a subpoena by the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee on that FBI agent while he was testifying -- all captured on live nationally broadcast television.
Now the FBI, which usually serves subpoenas and executes search warrants, is left with the alternative of complying with this unwanted subpoena by producing its entire file or arguing to a federal judge why it should not be compelled to do so.
On the Senate side, matters are even more out of hand. There, in response to a request from the Senate Judiciary Committee, the FBI sent both classified and unclassified materials to the Senate safe room. The Senate safe room is a secure location that is available only to senators and their senior staff, all of whom must surrender their mobile devices and writing materials and swear in writing not to reveal whatever they see while in the room before they are permitted to enter.
According to Sen. Chuck Grassley, chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the FBI violated federal law by commingling classified and unclassified materials in the safe room, thereby making it unlawful for senators to discuss publicly the unclassified material.
Imposing such a burden of silence on U.S. senators about unclassified materials is unlawful and unconstitutional. What does the FBI have to hide? Whence comes the authority of the FBI to bar senators from commenting on unclassified materials?
Who cares about this? Everyone who believes that the government works for us should care because we have a right to know what the government -- here the FBI -- has done in our names. Sen. Grassley has opined that if he could reveal what he has seen in the FBI unclassified records, it would be of profound interest to American voters.
What is going on here? The FBI investigation of Hillary Clinton has not served the rule of law. The rule of law -- a pillar of American constitutional freedom since the end of the Civil War -- mandates that the laws are to be enforced equally. No one is beneath their protection, and no one is above their requirements. To enforce the rule of law, we have hired the FBI.
What do we do when the FBI rejects its basic responsibilities?


Fun to watch!

Americans’ Trust in Mass Media Plunges to Record Low in Gallup Poll ^ | 9-14-2016 | Michael Krieger 

In yesterday’s post, The Death of Mainstream Media, I noted:

At the end of the day, I have concluded that my focus on Hillary as of late (vs. Trump) has as much to with my disgust for the mainstream media as anything else. To see these organs, which have destroyed this country by keeping the people uninformed for decades, now rally around a sickly, corrupt, oligarch coddling politician as the empire enters the collapse stage is simply too much to stomach…

The only positive thing to happen during this election season is the death of mainstream media. With their insufferable propaganda fully exposed, there is no coming back.

Then today, we learned the following from Gallup:

WASHINGTON, D.C. — Americans’ trust and confidence in the mass media “to report the news fully, accurately and fairly” has dropped to its lowest level in Gallup polling history, with 32% saying they have a great deal or fair amount of trust in the media. This is down eight percentage points from last year.
Here’s a chart.

If that’s not a trend, I don’t know what is.
Gallup began asking this question in 1972, and on a yearly basis since 1997. Over the history of the entire trend, Americans’ trust and confidence hit its highest point in 1976, at 72%, in the wake of widely lauded examples of investigative journalism regarding Vietnam and the Watergate scandal. After staying in the low to mid-50s through the late 1990s and into the early years of the new century, Americans’ trust in the media has fallen slowly and steadily. It has consistently been below a majority level since 2007.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

FOUND: Meet Hillary’s Secret Body Double Teresa Barnwell

Your Nation News ^ | 9-14-2016 | Ben Turner 

Some people have speculated about how Hillary Clinton can appear in poor health one day and be out and about running around town like nothing is wrong only a few hours later. It seems that the mystery might finally be answered. Teresa Barnwell could be the body double for Hillary Clinton when the former first lady isn’t feeling up to par with making personal appearances.

Hillary had to leave a 9/11 memorial service because she felt faint. She started to cough and needed to rest. Hillary went to her daughter’s apartment in New York. This is a woman who was sick enough to leave a memorial service for people who gave their lives on a day of tragedy, but only a few hours after going to her daughter’s apartment, she was seen leaving like nothing was wrong.

Many believe that it was Teresa Barnwell who left the apartment instead of Hillary. Teresa looks almost identical to Hillary and exhibits the same mannerisms that Hillary uses as well. One of the things that people have commented about is that Secret Service wouldn’t have let Hillary leave the apartment so quickly after feeling as sick as she was during the memorial. The guards would have also been near her instead of letting her roam by herself.

Video of Hillary Leaving Chelsea's home after 9-11 episode.


Forbidden Knowledge TV
There are many theories flying fast and furious about the health of Democratic Presidential Nominee, Hillary Clinton and how her campaign staff, the DC establishment and the Mainstream Media could have colluded to subvert the political process of the US Government by allowing a felonious and terminally-ill Nominee to still be running for President, less than two months before the Election.
In this hilarious tour-de-force by the incredibly cynical YouTuber, Barry Soetoro, which highlights many of the absurd events of the 2016 election, from Canada-born Ted Cruz’ run for the Republican ticket to FBI Director James Comey’s testimony before Congress, he proposes a theory as good as any.
Soetoro suggests that Hillary is purposefully having public seizures and falling down in public, damaging the “brand” of the US Government and the Federal Reserve Bank to increase her “buyout price”, which she is uniquely positioned to get away with doing, because she allegedly has 600 blackmail files on members of the government and law enforcement.
Along the way, we get to see a loop from the side-splitting 1967 Mel Brooks comedy, ‘The Producers’ about a Broadway Musical that was intended to be a flop but it was so horrible that it was actually great and it became a smash hit. The loop is from the song and dance number, “Heil Myself”, featuring Adolf Hitler and tarted-up Nazi dancers.
It’s as good of a theory as any but I’d like to get a better explanation about what the Hell is going on.
Meanwhile, last Monday, House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah) issued subpoena from the FBI for the unredacted email communications of Hillary Clinton from herhomebrew server.

Some Quick, easy steps to tell if you’re a deplorable

Boston Herald ^ | 14 Sep, 2016 | Howie Carr 

Are you a “deplorable,” one of those dreadful Donald Trump supporters who so offend Hillary Clinton’s delicate sensibilities?

As far as she’s concerned, the deplorables are expendable, in order to make room for her “basket” of voters, the despicable and the deportable.
If Hillary hadn’t had that problem with seasonal allergies or overheating or chronic dehydration or pneumonia or whatever they’re calling it now, her “deplorables” slur would be getting a lot more play.

Are you a “deplorable,” one of those dreadful Donald Trump supporters who so offend Hillary Clinton’s delicate sensibilities?
As far as she’s concerned, the deplorables are expendable, in order to make room for her “basket” of voters, the despicable and the deportable.
If Hillary hadn’t had that problem with seasonal allergies or overheating or chronic dehydration or pneumonia or whatever they’re calling it now, her “deplorables” slur would be getting a lot more play.
Didn’t Barack Obama say a few months back that a candidate couldn’t insult his way to the presidency? I guess he was referring to Donald Trump. Hillary Clinton, apparently, can.
n case you’ve been wondering which side you’re on, you may be a deplorable if you stand for the National Anthem.
Or if you know all the words to the Pledge of Allegiance, especially, “under God.”
Or if when you go to Market Basket, you tend to buy generic products, because you’re using your own money, not an EBT card.
You may be a deplorable if you just got your car inspected.
If you’re deployable, you’re definitely deplorable.
If you wake before noon, if you call Islamic terrorists Islamic terrorists, if you don’t have an Obamaphone and you don’t believe that global warming is “settled science” — can you say deplorable?.....
Saying Merry Christmas — Deplorable with a capital D!
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Why Hillary Clinton’s Bashing Of Trump Supporters Is Far More Revealing Than Democrats Would Like

Huffington Post ^ | September 14 2016 | Diana E Sheets 

It’s the countdown to the 2016 presidential election and emotions are running high. Since Barack Obama was elected president in 2008, the Democrats have come to believe that their party will govern in perpetuity.
To achieve this, the media manipulates the “news” in order to obfuscate Hillary Clinton’s mistakes on Benghazi, her mishandling of top-secret classified government documents, and her questionable ties with donors associated with the Clinton Foundation while serving as Secretary of State. Hillary’s behavior draws associations with the “pay for play” practices that caused former Illinois Governor, Rod Blagojevich, to end up in jail. Nevertheless, she remains the Democratic candidate for president.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

L.A. Times Stunned by Diversity of Volunteers at Trump H.Q.

Breitbart ^ | 9/14/2016 | ADELLE NAZARIAN 

The Los Angeles Times paid a visit to Donald Trump’s Southern California headquarters in Long Beach on Monday and was stunned by the diversity of volunteers who are committed to seeing him win the Golden State and the presidency.

“It was as if the whole thing had been staged, in Cambodia Town, no less, to belie the notion that Trump’s appeal is largely limited to older white males,” the Times‘s Steve Lopez wrote. In Long Beach, one of America’s most diverse cities, that same diversity was reflected in Trump’s supporters at his Southern California headquarters.

Lopez spoke with a woman and millennials of Filipino descent, a Mexican-American, and a Jewish man, and saw the “names of volunteers from the African-American, Hispanic and Asian communities” written on blackboards adorning the names of volunteers. He noted that “two middle-aged white people [also] joined the party.”
Trump’s grand opening for his headquarters took place this past Saturday, and Breitbart News was there to cover it. As Lopez was told, there were hundreds of people there over the course of the opening; many of them were able to enjoy a performance that was put on by dancers from the Khmer Arts Cultural Center, known as a traditional Cambodian “blessing dance;” something Lopez wrote he would have paid to see.
Lopez wrote that an unnamed Mexican-American Trump volunteer told him that “there are too many illegals here… and they dirty the place up and they take jobs and do things hey shouldn’t.” Lopez noted that once he found out he was with the Times, the man said “the only thing the Times is any good for is to wrap fish in it,” before walking away.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Do You Know What Today Is?

 by TBP

Do you know what today is?

Saturday, September 17, is of course a very important and underappreciated occasion which I believe should be a national holiday:

Constitution Day, the anniversary of the adoption of the U.S. Constitution in 1787.

But it was on this date, September 14, that one of the most important provisions came into being, thanks to George Mason. It was Article V.

"The Congress, whenever two thirds of both houses shall deem it necessary, shall propose amendments to this Constitution, or, on the application of the legislatures of two thirds of the several states, shall call a convention for proposing amendments, which, in either case, shall be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of this Constitution, when ratified by the legislatures of three fourths of the several states, or by conventions in three fourths thereof, as the one or the other mode of ratification may be proposed by the Congress; provided that no amendment which may be made prior to the year one thousand eight hundred and eight shall in any manner affect the first and fourth clauses in the ninth section of the first article; and that no state, without its consent, shall be deprived of its equal suffrage in the Senate."

The Founders were smart enough to know that Congress would never propose amendments limiting Federal power, so if it became tyrannical, the only way was to give the sovereign states that power as well, when the people demanded it.

It's time to claim that power and make use of it.

Don’t look now: Donald Trump has all the momentum in the 2016 race

The Washington Post's The Fix ^ | September 14, 2016 | Chris Cillizza 

Something very interesting has happened over the past two weeks in the presidential campaign: Donald Trump has seized the momentum from Hillary Clinton and is climbing back into contention in both national and key swing state polling.

New polls released over the past 24 hours confirm this momentum. In Ohio, Trump leads Clinton by five points in a new Bloomberg Politics poll and a similar five in a CNN poll. In Florida, Trump has a three-point lead on Clinton. In Nevada, Trump has a two-point edge, according to a Monmouth University survey. And in the latest weekly tracking poll from NBC and Survey Monkey, Clinton's national lead has shrunk to just four points. In the RealClearPolitics polling average of all national surveys, Clinton's lead has shrunk to two points over Trump....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Destruction of Hillary Clinton’s Email Records During the U.S. Federal Government Investigation ^ | 9/14/16 | Donald S. Skupsky, JD, CRM, FAI, MIT 

The news wires have been ablaze with stories about Hillary Clinton’s private email server — production of some emails during a protracted government investigation and the destruction of other emails which Clinton deemed unrelated to the investigation. While pundits and supporters construe conclusions based on their political affiliation and beliefs, most do not have the knowledge and experience related to destruction of records and recordkeeping systems to clearly identify the legal and recordkeeping issues related to this matter.
This article is not meant as a political tirade, but rather an objective analysis of the laws related to the known facts and recordkeeping issues affecting the outcome. And, the article intends to clear the air regarding the behavior expected by the law during a government investigation (or litigation or audit) related to the destruction of email and other records. Background
For the last 30 years, I have preached in my writings, seminars and consulting projects that relevant records may not be destroyed during litigation, government investigation or audit. The records management profession and corporate legal departments advocate procedures, generally referred to as “legal holds” that prevent the improper destruction of records during legal actions. During an expert witness engagement, I was asked to read the twenty passages from my 1988 book “Recordkeeping Requirements” that implored readers to not destroy relevant records when litigation, government investigation or audit is in progress, imminent, or even in some cases even foreseeable.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Tough Phoenix sheriff may have new foe: George Soros! ^ | Sep 14, 2016 | Jacques Billeaud 

Joe Arpaio, the self-proclaimed toughest sheriff in America who could face criminal charges for ignoring a judge's order to stop targeting Latinos in anti-immigration roundups, may now have a new foe as he seeks re-election - George Soros, the billionaire liberal hedge fund tycoon.
The Republican sheriff already was battered politically and support for him had been slipping when a group linked to Soros mounted an anti-Arpaio attack in an attempt to weaken his bid for a seventh straight term.
Officials with the billionaire's Soros Fund Management referred comment on Soros' political donations to Michael Vachon, a top Soros adviser who serves as his personal spokesman. Vachon did not respond to emailed requests for comment.
The new anti-Arpaio group, Maricopa Strong, registered in Arizona on Aug. 29, the day before Arpaio won his Republican primary against three opponents. It is not required to file a report detailing who made donations and spending until Sept. 29.
But county records state Maricopa Strong's chairwoman is Whitney Tymas, a former public defense attorney in New York and Virginia prosecutor who serves as treasurer for the Soros-funded Safety & Justice national political committee and groups with similar names in Illinois, Florida, Texas and New Mexico.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Hillary Is Not Even A Competent Liar ^ | September 15, 2016 | Kurt Schlichter 

The year 2016 is one of the worst and stupidest years in American history, but at least frail, sickly, and old Hillary’s recent collapse helped restore America’s faith in the power of love. The moment Bill heard that she was sick he rushed to his woman’s bedside. And then, as soon as he was finished, he picked up the phone and called Chelsea’s apartment to see how Hillary was doing.
Where was Bill in all this anyway? Even if some media hack had suffered an unexpected bout of Sudden Onset Curiosity and asked, who cares what Team Hillary’s answer would be? It’s all lies, all the time, anyway. And the most insulting part to our collective intelligence is that they are not even competent lies. Take it from a trial lawyer: you can’t fabricate quality fibs on an assembly line. They need to be carefully crafted, polished, and honed to a razor’s edge, blending deception with just the right proportion of truth to make them strong like steel. But Hillary is not even trying anymore.
She was a tad overheated on a pleasant day. Wait, there’s video? Strike that. She was, uh, just feeling woozy so she decided to visit her grandkids over at Chelsea Spaulding Clinton’s pad, the one paid for with all that hard work journalist-ing. Oh wait, now she has pneumonia. I mean, has had pneumonia for a while and yet she still powered through to bring home the bacon, fry it over a pan, and never, ever let you forget she’s not a man.
Despite being swimming with pathogens, Hillary still managed to essentially ride a bear across a meadow and you deplorable basket-dwellers refused to acknowledge her awesome virility. It’s because she’s a woman, isn’t it?
But wait, when this human petri dish cavorted with a child in the least-spontaneous “spontaneous” photo op in the history of photo ops – “Agent Smith, there’s a kid running out toward Cankles One, but she’s so gosh darn adorable that I’m going to just chill, over” – didn’t that imagery reinforce that Hillary was not sick?
Can’t these hacks even get their bogus narratives straight?
Yet why should they bother? Why should Task Force Pantsuit expend any effort at all trying to construct convincing prevarications when the mainstream media is going to smile and nod at whatever they say? Without resistance, you aren’t going to get any stronger, and Clinton’s lies have just gotten weaker and weaker. For her, lying to the mainstream media is like weightlifting by pumping Styrofoam.
James Comey not only said she did nothing wrong but praised her for her innovative and pioneering work improving America’s electronic security procedures. Why do you assume a woman can’t handle classified materials as well as a man, sexist?
No one was killed in Benghazi. In fact, there is no such thing as Benghazi. Or Libya. Actually, thanks to Hillary, for all practical purposes, there no longer is such thing as Libya.
Everyone who votes for Trump likes Hitler because no one could possibly oppose Hillary without wanting to tongue wrestle with David Duke. Also, Trump is going to put Pepe on the quarter.
She didn’t stumble. That was just a loving tribute to Cinderella. Why do you GOP cynics hate the innocent joy a child derives from a fairy tale?
No, she was simply krumping. Why do you deplorable Trump supporters hate urban culture? Um, racism!
And stop with the conspiracy theories about her being sick, you crazy nuts, except now stop refusing to give her credit for driving on with her fundraising and her slandering of half of America when she is crawling with disease, you crazy nuts.
You know, the Hillary Body Double theory is pretty hilarious, but admit it – who would actually be surprised if it turns out she has a body double? Secretly, even the liberals are thinking to themselves, “You know, I can totally see that.”
Hillary was a terrible senator, a terrible Secretary of State, and now she’s a terrible candidate, surfing from sinecure to sinecure on a tsunami of lies. But she’s gotten a free pass on her duplicity for so long that she’s not even trying to pass the straight face test anymore. Her loyal minions are so slobberingly committed to her that they don’t even demand that she provide them enough plausible deniability to preserve their few remaining shreds of dignity.  
The mainstream media loves Hillary so deeply and without reservation that she can say literally anything to a gaggle of adoring reporters and absolutely know that they will not only not challenge her, but that her media transcriptionists will swing into action to actively defend her lies should anyone break ranks and dare to point out that the would-be empress has no clothes. No wonder whenever Monica Lewinsky watches CNN, she thinks, “Been there, done that.”

Could Hillary Tell Us What Percentage Of Muslims Are 'Deplorable'? ^ | 9/14/2016 | Ann Coulter 

It wasn't just the well-heeled donors at the Cipriani Club who laughed and applauded when Hillary called half of Trump's supporters a "basket of deplorables" -- "racist, sexist, homophobic, xenophobic, Islamophobic.”
Her campaign advisers also thought it was a killer line. This wasn't an off-the-cuff remark captured on a bartender's cellphone. We know that because: (1) nothing is ever off-the-cuff with Hillary; (2) it was part of her scripted remarks, and (3) she's used it before.
Nor did anyone in the media mind one little bit. They've been calling Trump's supporters racists for more than a year now. Calling other people "racist" is the media's favorite thing to do.
Whenever the left talks about "racism," it has nothing to do with what's good or bad for black people. It's just another event in the Fabulous White People competition, where black people are the chips.
There was a period in this country when racism was a big problem. Unfortunately, when it mattered, liberals were on the wrong side. Only when the principal danger facing most black Americans was that they'd be patronized to death, did liberals start seeing "racism" everywhere.
Sad people with meaningless lives were suddenly empowered to condemn other people. I beat you in blacks yesterday; I'm going to beat you in women today. This is what makes them feel superior to other people, especially other white people. It's not about racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.; it's just a self-actualization movement for people with emotional issues.
The dead giveaway is that all the hacks on the left are using the same jokes. Compare the opening lines of James Kirchick of the New York Daily News and Dana Milbank of The Washington Post in their columns on Hillary's "basket of deplorables" insult:
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

‘Disadvantaged’ Beverly Hills Fashionista Worked No-Show VA Job, Took Millions From Feds

Daily Caller ^ | 9/11/2016 | Luke Rosiak 

A fashionista from Beverly Hills, Calif., collected millions in interior design contracts from federal agencies by claiming to be “disadvantaged,” while simultaneously working at the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) sending work to design companies.
Ronda C. Jackson was a no-show at her VA job, colleagues said. Records show she instead spent her time running a design company that got $7 million in contracts from the VA and other government agencies since 2008, reselling them marked-up goods like five-seat tables for $17,000.
Since 1997, Jackson has run Décor Interior Design, which seeks preference on government contracts by claiming to be disadvantaged because she is black, a woman and based out of a supposedly downtrodden “Historically Underutilized Business Zone” (HUBZone). The reduced-competition contracting program is known as 8(a).
Jackson worked as a full-time federal employee at the Los Angeles VA center in fiscal years 2010 and 2011, which ran from Oct. 1, 2009 to Sept. 30, 2011. Pay records show she worked as a GS-12 level interior designer and made $80,000 each year. Colleagues said they never saw Jackson in the office.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Bill’s glitzy birthday bash raises money for Clinton Foundation

Politico ^ | September 14, 2016 | Kenneth P. Vogel and Gabriel Debenedetti 

Even as the Clintons are touting plans to distance themselves from their foundation and limit its fundraising if Hillary Clinton is elected president, they’re planning one last glitzy fundraising bash on Friday to belatedly celebrate Bill Clinton’s 70th birthday.

The fundraiser is being held at the Rainbow Room, a fine-dining restaurant on the 65th floor of a Manhattan skyscraper. Plans called for performances by Wynton Marsalis, Jon Bon Jovi and Barbra Streisand, according to people briefed on the planning. They said that major donors are being asked to give $250,000 to be listed as a chair for the party, $100,000 to be listed a co-chair and $50,000 to be listed as a vice-chair.
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

Nothing Left To Lie About ^ | September 15, 2016 | Derek Hunter 

Willie Sutton famously said he robbed banks “because that’s where the money is.” But he clearly had a compulsion.
In his book “No One Left To Lie To,” Christopher Hitchens deconstructed Bill Clinton’s compulsion to lie. If he were alive today, my friend would have a field day with Bill’s wife.
Lying is breathing for the Clintons. Secrecy is favored above all. When the truth would do, they lie – seemingly only to see if they can get away with it.
When there are potentially serious consequences, they lie. When there is nothing at stake, they lie. Jon Lovitz should sue them for stealing his Tommy Flanagan character.
The lies about the secret server and threats to national security or the pay-for-play years at the State Department are somewhat understandable – there are serious consequences should the truth ever come out. When your future plans, and prison, are potentially on the line, BleachBit-ing your server when its contents are under subpoena is a gamble a lot of people would take.
And it paid off for Hillary. Just like all the other lies have paid off for the Clintons.
When you’ve been getting away with it your whole life, why wouldn’t you keep doing it?
What has changed is not the frequency of the lying but the purpose. Pleading ignorance to a friendly FBI on what you can and can not remember is one thing; claiming to be “overheated” on a cool summer morning is something else.
When Hillary Clinton passed out, then needed to be propped up like a broom against a wall by her staff and security detail, her campaign first denied anything had happened. Then, the campaign said she was merely overheated and would be fine.
Were it not for a civilian filming her carcass being dragged and slung into her van, the first story might have stuck and the second almost certainly would have.
After hours of liberal journalists rushing to recount their own brushes with “overheating” and anchors (particularly MSNBC) beclowning themselves about her “long sleeves” and blistering temperatures in New York on Sunday morning (it was breezy in the high 70s with low humidity, for the record), the campaign paraded Hillary out of her daughter’s building to wave and hug a young girl. All was well.
But it wasn’t all well because it wasn’t at all true.
Later in the day, the Clinton campaign forced its journalist allies to scrap all their hard work yet again when it announced she had pneumonia. They lined up to declare her “brave” for “powering through” to continue to campaign.
So was Hillary dehydrated, sick, tired or simply too hot? Yes and no. And maybe.
It doesn’t matter, really. What matters is the lie. If any of those stories were true – and it’s safe to assume none before the pneumonia story were – they’d have stuck with them. The truth, after all, is much easier to remember, and it doesn’t matter whether it’s believable.
But the stories weren’t true. And instead of going for truth, they were going for believable. The evidence – that video, along with the fact no one else in the large crowd at the memorial even seemed to be sweating – took the viability from that lie.
The pneumonia story can’t really be refuted, so the third time was the charm. The press could demand to see X-rays from Friday, which is when the campaign claims Clinton’s doctor diagnosed her. They could ask when she saw the doctor Friday, and where, and how she was able to do all of this while attending campaign events. You know, fact check the claim. But they aren’t going to do that.
They could ask how her doctor managed to not only diagnose her without anyone noticing, but also declare her to not be contagious at the same time, especially when we’re told pneumonia has spread throughout her campaign.
So somehow everyone around her was spreading and catching pneumonia, and not only did the press not notice them dropping like flies, or catch it themselves, Hillary managed to catch a non-contagious version of it. They could ask, but they won’t. The media has its own compulsion – wanting to believe whatever her campaign tells them.
Whether it’s a lie matters less than the fact that only true believers buy any of it. No rational person hears three different explanations, all asserted as the truth at the time, and thinks they’re finally being leveled with.
That’s how the Clintons are; they lie like they breathe – as a reflex. It’s like a muscle they must exercise to prevent atrophy, and they’re running out of “heavy lifts” to lie about, so they lie about anything.
What responsible adult would seek refuge at her daughter’s apartment with two young children while stricken with pneumonia that caused you to pass out only minutes earlier? It’s not an accident Hillary is about as believable as a candidate as Jared from Subway is as a babysitter.
All politicians lie; we know this. But they’re usually lies of overpromising. The Clintons, particularly Hillary, lie because it’s how they’ve gotten into power, how they’ve maintained it, how they’ve gotten rich. It’s not second nature; it is her nature. It’s a compulsion. That’s how to explain so much effort being expended to cover what we’re told was really nothing. If the truth is so innocuous, you don’t work so hard to shield it.

See you soon!

Clinton’s Nonexistent Diagnosis–No Such Condition As “Non Contagious Bacterial Pneumonia”!

Conservative Treehouse ^ | September 14, 2016 | Sundance 

There’s something very odd about the diagnosis that Dr. Lisa Bardack has presented for her patient Secretary Hillary Clinton, it’s doesn’t exist.
As you can see from the two-page letter presented today by Hillary Clinton’s doctor, she has been diagnosed with “mild non-contagious bacterial pneumonia“. However, there’s a problem….

The International Classification of Diseases (ICD), an ObamaCare standard, is designed code all medical diagnostics. According to ICD-9 codes, and the more current ICD-10 coding, there’s no such diagnosis as “non contagious bacterial pneumonia“.

Dr. Bardack apparently made it up.
Dr. Milton Wolf was the first to notice the issue:
(Excerpt) Read more at ...



Body Double


The Shady Bunch


Fit as a fiddle


Tangled Webs


Screw You!








Just Us!


Never Never Land


Terminal Dishonesty


Tis but a flesh wound!


Too late?


It Takes a Village


Clinton News Network!




Core Beliefs




Made in...


The Debates