December 5, 2015 | delacoert
It's not just the absence of presidential leadership. It's the fact that a whole group of people from the presidential administration to the press corps of the United States is entirely silent about the malfeasance of the president.
Why isn't, he, the president talking about terror in San Bernardino?
Why isn't the President taking a leadership role in helping the citizens of the United States deal with this horrific terrorist event?
Why aren't the members of Obama's administration reacting in a way that shows concern about the terrorism and about the commander-in-chief's apparent lack of concern in that he is saying and doing nothing?
Why aren't the members of the press going crazy about the lack of leadership out of the Office of the President to the worst act in the US since 9/11.
-
Free Government ^ | 1997 | Sraff Free government assisted cell phone programs have become more popular, in part, due to the poor economy ...
-
The Dems went down to Georgia They was looking for a seat to steal They were in a bind, 'cause they were way behind They were willing t...
