National Review ^ | 2/5/2014 | Rich Lowry
The Democrats once styled themselves the party of workers. Now, they are the
party of people who would have been workers, if it hadn’t been for Obamacare.
The Congressional Budget Office released a new analysis of the economic
effects of the health care law on Tuesday that estimates that it will reduce the
number of workers, in effect, by 2.5 million in 2024.
This unleashed a torrent of arguments from the Democrats implicitly
denigrating the value of work. Perhaps not since Southern fire-eaters attacked
Northern “wage slavery” in the mid-19th century has a good honest day’s work
been talked about so dismissively. It turns out that discouraging work is just
another one of the wonders of Obamacare.
The old jobs crisis was people not having jobs; the new jobs crisis is people
having to work. The party devoted to combating inequality is now blithely
unconcerned about a law discouraging people — especially people down the income
scale — from earning more. So much for its championing of economic mobility.
White House press secretary Jay Carney declared the CBO report a validation
of the law: “At the beginning of this year, we noted that as part of this new
day in health care, Americans would no longer be trapped in a job just to
provide coverage for their families and would have the opportunity to pursue
their dreams. This CBO report bears that out.”
If only the number of people effectively dissuaded from working were 5
million, or 7.5 million, the health care law would be an even more stunning
triumph of sound public policy and true American values.
A few caveats are in order: We aren’t talking about jobs that are eliminated
in the usual sense of discouraging employers from hiring, as some Republican
talking points suggested. That would be the demand side for labor; this is the
supply side. And the 2.5 million number isn’t for jobs per se, but for
“full-time equivalent” positions, i.e., the cumulative lost hours of millions of
people deciding to work less.
Nonetheless, the number is devastating. Democrats like Jay Carney want to
pass it all off as ending the “job lock” that keeps people in a job only to
preserve their health insurance. This is what Nancy Pelosi was getting at when
she airily described Obamacare before its passage as “an entrepreneurial bill, a
bill that says to someone, if you want to be creative and be a musician or
whatever, you can leave your work, focus on your talent, your skill, your
passion.”
DIOGENES invites you to pull up a chair on this fine day and read posts from around the world. The writing may lean to the right...but that's the way Diogenes wants it! You may leave your opinion, but Diogenes rarely changes his! WELCOME!
-
Free Government ^ | 1997 | Sraff Free government assisted cell phone programs have become more popular, in part, due to the poor economy ...
-
The Dems went down to Georgia They was looking for a seat to steal They were in a bind, 'cause they were way behind They were willing t...