Sunday, May 12, 2013

History Will See Obama as Nothing But a Communist Tool... and a Failed One at That

Outside of wishful thinking... at this point,
how could anyone attempt to purport otherwise?

Uncle Joe sez...

STALIN on ACORN/urban Democratic 'machines':
"Those who cast the votes decide nothing. Those who count the votes decide everything."
STALIN on today's "progressive" agenda:
"America is like a healthy body and its resistance is threefold: its patriotism, its morality, and its spiritual life. If we can undermine these three areas, America will collapse from within."
STALIN on religion:
God is on your side? Is He a Conservative? The Devil's on my side, he's a good Communist.
STALIN on counting-your-blessings:
"Gratitude is a sickness suffered by dogs."
STALIN on gun control:
"If the opposition (citizen) disarms, well and good. If it refuses to disarm, we shall disarm it ourselves."
STALIN on corporate useful idiots (GE, GM, banks):
"When we hang the capitalists they will sell us the rope we use."

Obama's specious, intentionally misleading
stated agenda
(-jobs! -deficit! -economy!) while in reality pushing this nation right to the edge of the abyss economically, socially, and diplomatically -utilizing every and any lever available to him, precisely as Stalin schemed decades ago- makes it clear these actions are meant to undermine and/or destroy everything that made the United States of America great.

Unfortunately for those of us who actually do love the country, he's already done considerable damage- saddling our economy with stratospheric (and soaring) debt levels, stomping on The Constitution at every turn, and creating deep social scars that may take a generation -or more- to heal.

Today -as Michele Bachmann is gang-mocked by Obammunist drones in the dinosaur media for bringing some much-needed light to the anti-American intentions betrayed by the President's actions- how bout the other side explaining then why we should just sit back and allow vengeful and embittered radicals both inside and outside of government -like Van Jones- to raze this country to the ground...?

Seems the charge hits a little too close to home for some of the Administration's apologizer-enablers...and Bachmann is right.

And who's surprised by the USSR zombie popping-out of the grave to kill us, anyway? Obama's weirdo parents met in Russian class- what kind of people took Russian in the US in 1960...? Besides fellow far-left freak Neil Abercrombie,
Lee Harvey Oswald comes to mind.... bama is a communist

Web Surfing

You First

Help Arrives

Running and Hiding

1974 to 2013

Obama Is Every Bit as Bad as We Warned You!

Breitbart's The Conversation ^ | May 11, 2013 | Joel B. Pollak

Kurt Schlichter notes that conservatives have been vindicated quite often in the past several weeks:

Kurt Schlichter @KurtSchlichter

Things Conservatives Have Been Proven Right About Lately: ☑ Benghazi; ☑ Pigford;☑ Obamacare; ☑ IRS. Next up: The immigration reform scam.

I suspect that list will grow longer.
The common thread in each of these scandals is corruption and a willingness to abuse the expanded powers of big government--while failing to carry out the most basic responsibilities of any government.
In Benghazi, Obama a) failed to take action to save American diplomats in danger, then b) lied about it, with the enthusiastic help of mainstream media journalists (some of whom now want to blame Mitt Romney).
In Pigford, Obama pushed for additional billions in federal spending on fraudulent "reparations" processes that was abused in the name of real victims of racial discrimination--all so he could pay off key voting blocs.
In Obamacare, Obama rushed through a massive, unworkable law--then granted waivers to key companies and a disproportionate number of unions while his congressional allies worked to exempt themselves.
In the IRS scandal, the taxman targeted Tea Party and conservative groups--including, apparently, at least one pro-Israel group. It happened on Obama's watch; we may yet learn that it happened with his approval....
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

More Student Aid for Kids With Queer Parents!

Federal Student Aid Form Using “Parent 1”/“Parent 2” to “Reflect Diversity”, Better Calculate Aid
Cybercast News Service ^ | May 10, 2013 | Susan Jones

Applying for federal student aid? The application no longer asks about a student’s “mother” and “father.” Instead, the U.S. Education Department is replacing those terms with “Parent 1” and “Parent 2.”
“All students should be able to apply for federal student aid within a system that incorporates their unique family dynamics,” said U.S. Secretary of Education Arne Duncan in the April 29 announcement.
“These changes will allow us to more precisely calculate federal student aid eligibility based on what a student’s whole family is able to contribute and ensure taxpayer dollars are better targeted toward those students who have the most need, as well as provide an inclusive form that reflects the diversity of American families.” …
(Excerpt) Read more at ...

The State that rammed Obamacare straight up the ass of its subjects!

Cold Fury Blog ^ | May 11, 2013 | Mike

The Benghazi Lie A failure of character of this magnitude corrodes the integrity of the state.
That’s true, sure, but…the integrity of this State?
The State that rammed Obamacare straight up the ass of its subjects against their will, clearly expressed in the 2010 anti-Ogabe landslide?

The State that jails dissident film makers for clumsily insulting the not-quite-official-yet State religion?

The State that routinely pisses over its own Constitution, whose satraps and autarchs merely laugh dismissively when questioned on their routine abuses of power and attempt to provoke their opponents into violence (with the expected complete impunity, it must be added) by taking a long walk through their very midst brandishing a cartoonishly oversized prop gavel, laughing every step of the way at the impotence of those opponents, rubbing their noses in their absolute power?
The State whose satraps and autarchs lie, cheat, defraud, solicit bribery, and swindle their way into power without the slightest fear of either legal sanction or public disgrace?
The State even now engaging in a coverup of its obvious malfeasance in show hearings on an act of war resulting in the murder of an ambassador, hearings that will result in nothing of any real note or worth?
The State that has disbursed staggering sums of its subjects’ money to prop up a global-warming bribery scam/power grab that has now been shown to be based entirely on utter nonsense and fraud, with the real goal of manipulating the global economy in the biggest socialistic transfer of wealth in history?
The State that continues a failed War On (Some) Drugs justified by falsehood and manufactured hysteria not because it cares about its subjects’ health and well-being–if it did, it wouldn’t jail untold millions of them, destroying their lives for private, consensual behavior that harms no one in the overwhelming majority of cases–but because of the opportunities it presents for corruption and expanding its own power over them?
A State that seeks to control the smallest decisions its subjects make, while still fatuously propagandizing about its being a “free” country, unique in all the world–sanctimoniously repeating now-meaningless homilies about government “of, by, and for the people,” and the sanctity of “democracy”? Whose minions have audacity enough–presumption enough; sheer, coarse gall enough–to parrot words uttered by far greater men than they in the service of their perverted ambitions and greed…greater men whose grim and unmistakable warnings about the inevitable tendency to tyranny are dismissed and pooh-poohed by the very pygmys who have so debased the institutions those greater men founded in sweat, toil, sacrifice, and blood?
A State that forcibly asserts control of its subjects’ children for the formative years of their lives–not to educate them properly about the history of the former Republic and the giants among men that were its Founders, but to socialize them, training them in things like putting condoms on bananas, brainwashing them about environmentalism, recycling, and PC groupthink generally?
The State that uses the grief of subjects bereaved by the inevitable failure of the State’s very own anti-gun policies as a prop to encroach even further on those subjects’ natural rights, in what has to be one of the most disgustingly cynical and outrageous exercises of misbegotten power and manipulation in human history?
We’re even bothering to discuss the integrity of THAT State? Really?
No State ever really has much in the way of “integrity,” and this one far, far less than most. Of course Steyn knows this, and contra my title, he doesn’t really stumble at all with this column. In fact, it’s pretty much his whole point.
Are murdered ambassadors like those 1.43 million cables she doesn’t read? Just too many of them to keep track of? No. Only six had been killed in the history of the republic — seven, if you include Arnold Raphel, who perished in General Zia’s somewhat mysterious plane crash in Pakistan in 1988. Before that you have to go back to Adolph Dubs, who died during a kidnapping attempt in Kabul in 1979. So we have here a once-in-a-third-of-a-century event. And at 3 a.m. Libyan time on September 12 it’s still unfolding, with its outcome unclear. Hicks is now America’s head man in the country, and the cabinet secretary to whom he reports says, “Leave a message after the tone and I’ll get back to you before the end of the week.” Just to underline the difference here: Libya’s head of government calls Hicks, but nobody who matters in his own government can be bothered to.
What was Secretary Clinton doing that was more important? What was the president doing? Aside, that is, from resting up for his big Vegas campaign event. A real government would be scrambling furiously to see what it could do to rescue its people. It’s easy, afterwards, to say that nothing would have made any difference. But, at the time Deputy Chief Hicks was calling 9-1-1 and getting executive-branch voicemail, nobody in Washington knew how long it would last. A terrorist attack isn’t like a soccer game, over in 90 minutes. If it is a sport, it’s more like a tennis match: Whether it’s all over in three sets or goes to five depends on how hard the other guy pushes back. The government of the United States took the extremely strange decision to lose in straight sets. Not only did they not deploy out-of-area assets, they ordered even those in Libya to stand down. Lieutenant Colonel Gibson had a small team in Tripoli that twice readied to go to Benghazi to assist and twice was denied authority to do so, the latter when they were already at the airport. There weren’t many of them, not compared to the estimated 150 men assailing the compound. But they were special forces, not bozo jihadists. Back in Benghazi, Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty held off numerically superior forces for hours before dying on a rooftop waiting for back-up from a government that had switched the answering machine on and gone to Vegas.
Throughout the all-night firefight in Benghazi, Washington’s priority seems to have been to do everything possible to deny that what was actually happening was happening at all. To send “soldiers” on a “mission” to “fight” the “enemy” was at odds with the entire Obama narrative of the Arab Spring and the broader post-Bush Muslim world. And so the entire U.S. military was stood down in support of the commander-in-chief’s fiction.
The grotesque parade of miscreants, reprobates, hacks, and out-and-out criminals currently misruling us aren’t fit to govern, much less rule. Nearly every last one of them should more properly be swinging from lampposts in the DC streets until quite dead, their skulls later to be emptied, cleaned, and placed permanently on the pikes of the White House fence, pour encourager les autres…or more accurately, as a warning. It’s an indictment of our own integrity that they haven’t been already. As Steyn says, they are depraved. And so, apparently, are we. Mark knows this too:
As Mr. Hicks testified, his superiors in Washington knew early that night that a well-executed terrorist attack with the possible participation of al-Qaeda elements was under way. Instead of responding, the most powerful figures in the government decided that an unseen YouTube video better served their political needs. And, in the most revealing glimpse of the administration’s depravity, the president and secretary of state peddled the lie even in their mawkish eulogies to their buddy “Chris” and three other dead Americans. They lied to the victims’ coffins and then strolled over to lie to the bereaved, Hillary telling the Woods family that “we’re going to have that person arrested and prosecuted that did the video.” And she did. The government dispatched more firepower to arrest Nakoula Basseley Nakoula in Los Angeles than it did to protect its mission in Benghazi. It was such a great act of misdirection Hillary should have worn spangled tights and sawn Stevens’s casket in half.
The dying Los Angeles Times reported this story on its homepage (as a sidebar to “Thirteen Great Tacos in Southern California”) under the following headline: “Partisan Politics Dominates House Benghazi Hearing.” In fact, everyone in this story is a Democrat or a career civil servant. Chris Stevens was the poster boy for Obama’s view of the Arab Spring; he agreed with the president on everything that mattered. The only difference is that he wasn’t in Vegas but out there on the front line, where Obama’s delusions meet reality. Stevens believed in those illusions enough to die for them. One cannot say the same about the hollow men and women in Washington who sent him out there unprotected, declined to lift a finger when he came under attack, and in the final indignity subordinated his sacrifice to their political needs by lying over his corpse. Where’s the “partisan politics”? Obama, Clinton, Panetta, Clapper, Rice, and the rest did this to one of their own. And fawning court eunuchs, like the ranking Democrat at the hearings, Elijah Cummings, must surely know that, if they needed, they’d do it to them, too. If you believe in politics über alles, it’s impressive, in the same way that Hillary’s cocksure dismissal — “What difference, at this point, does it make?” — is impressive.
But the embassy security chief, Eric Nordstrom, had the best answer to that: It matters because “the truth matters” — not least to the Libyan president, who ever since has held the U.S. government in utter contempt. Truth matters, and character matters. For the American people to accept the Obama-Clinton lie is to be complicit in it.
It’s perhaps Steyn’s harshest and most bitter column yet, and also one of his best. Despite the fact that I’ve excerpted a larger chunk than usual, probably more than fair use allows, you really want to read all of it–and gird your loins. Because trouble is coming, as surely as the sunrise–bad trouble, and in some ways at least, it’s going to be a very good thing. The tree of liberty will soon be refreshed. Not because we wish it, but, as American patriots going all the way back to Jefferson have always known, because it must be.
There will be blood. We can only pray it’s enough to wash us clean of the stain left by our acquiescence in allowing such contemptible vermin to flout decency by ruling over us in such a profoundly despicable way.
Update! More from Steyn at the Corner:
As Andy writes in his column, the Libyan president had publicly condemned the terrorist attack in Benghazi, and was therefore stunned to switch on CNN International and find Susan Rice insisting that it was all to do with a movie protest – in other words, the US Government was lying to its own citizenry as shamelessly as the Gaddafi or Assad regime would. What would you do in President Magarief’s shoes? He knows the YouTube story is false, and he knows that Washington knows it’s false, and knew it on the very night of the Benghazi assault. And, quite reasonably enough, he has never trusted the Americans since.
One very immediate consequence of this is that the FBI were prevented from getting into Libya – again entirely reasonably: Magarief knows Obama, Clinton and Rice are peddling a fraud with no basis in reality, so it would seem prudent to assume that any US agents he lets in are not there to find out the truth but to prop up the fraud. So he kept them well away from Benghazi, for weeks.
The changes the State Department demanded in order not to undermine the FBI investigation wound up undermining it (and US/Libyan relations) profoundly.
No matter, as long as the Ogabe shitweasels were enabled to hang onto their illegitimate power. Elsewhere, Peter Kirsanow says this:
Shortly after the terrorist attack on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi, a local Denver television personality asked President Obama what actions he took upon learning of the assault. The president asserted, “I gave three very clear directives. Number one, make sure we are securing our personnel and that we are doing whatever we need to. Number two, we are going to investigate exactly what happened and make sure it doesn’t happen again. Number three, find out who did this so we can bring them to justice.”
As to the first directive, we now know from Greg Hicks’s testimony that special forces were ordered to stand down rather than provide assistance. Furthermore, we learned months ago from Jennifer Griffin’s reporting that former Navy SEAL Tyrone Woods requested and was denied backup three times, and was told to stand down. Who, then, gave the orders that flatly rejected the president’s “very clear directive?” Was that person disciplined for flagrantly disobeying the commander in chief?
Isn’t it far more likely that no directive was given than such directive was repeatedly disobeyed?
Of course it is. In fact, the only time Ogabe would ever be likely to issue such directives in the first place would be when the context is a struggle with his domestic political opposition; he’ll never do any such thing to our enemies abroad. He knows who his real enemies are–and, to quote Pogo, they are us.  

Mother's Day is Sexist...or Something

Creative Minority Report ^ | 5/10/2013 | matthew archbold

The left hates the fact that men and women are different. They hate the differences so much that they pretend they don't exist. It's kinda' like when my five year old is mad at her brother. She closes her eyes, covers hear ears and announces, "I can't hear you."

Journalist Kate Stone Lombardi believes that the different ways that Mothers Day and Fathers Day are celebrated shows how backwards we are and not as hip as say... Time Magazine.

Of course, there is not a thing wrong with children saying thank you for all those cuddles and comfort, or for expressing gratitude for models of strength and responsibility. These are all lovely sentiments. The question is: why in 2013, are we still dividing all these traits by gender? It’s insulting to both women and men and it has less and less to do with contemporary American families. Dads can be nurturers. Moms can be role models. Many, of course, already are.

A recent Pew study noted that the family roles of mothers and fathers are increasingly converging. Dads are doing more housework and childcare; moms more paid work outside the home. In fact, today nearly equal shares of working mothers and fathers report feeling stressed about balancing work and family life.
I read this and I thought originally that I was just reading someone who was up against a deadline and was desperate for something to write about. I mean, think about it, I think most families decide how to spend Mothers and Fathers day all by themselves. There's no Hallmark council enforcing regulations.

So I thought it was a pointless piece. But alas, when I read it again it all became clear. It turns out she hates Mothers and Fathers day because it doesn't work into her worldview that families are fungible. She writes:
Of course, there is not a thing wrong with children saying thank you for all those cuddles and comfort, or for expressing gratitude for models of strength and responsibility. These are all lovely sentiments. The question is: why in 2013, are we still dividing all these traits by gender? It’s insulting to both women and men and it has less and less to do with contemporary American families. Dads can be nurturers. Moms can be role models. Many, of course, already are.

A recent Pew study noted that the family roles of mothers and fathers are increasingly converging. Dads are doing more housework and childcare; moms more paid work outside the home. In fact, today nearly equal shares of working mothers and fathers report feeling stressed about balancing work and family life.

And that’s just heterosexual married couples. Single parents assume multiple roles that blur “traditional” realms. Studies that look at gay parents question the presumption that mothers and fathers bring separate gender-based skills to parenting (like mothers excel in nurturing and caretaking, while fathers bring discipline and rough housing into the mix).
Ah. You see, this isn't about how these holidays are celebrated. This is about there being a Mothers and Fathers day at all. Perhaps she'd like it more if we tossed the old holidays and instituted "Legal Guardian Day" or maybe "Dad and his live-in-partner Eric day."

Her issue isn't with Mothers and Fathers Day, it's with Mothers and Fathers.

8 People Planned Parenthood Hates the Most

Planned Parenthood is much in the news lately. And they can't be happy about it. The trial of House of Horrors abortionist Kermit Gosnell is putting killing babies in a bad light. And then Lila Rose and Live Action released a number of videos showing there's no real difference between Planned Parenthood and Gosnell. So I've put together a list of people I believe Planned Parenthood hates the most. Here they are:

Lila Rose - You can't overestimate the intensity of hatred that Planned Parenthood feels for Lila Rose. You see, representatives of Planned Parenthood never talk about abortion or babies in public. It's weird. Planned Parenthood aborts babies. It’s what they do. It’s their job.
Oddly enough they love to talk extensively about things like mammograms which they don’t actually provide and know nothing about. You'd never know from listening to them that 91% of pregnant woman walking into a Planned Parenthood clinic will have an abortion. But Planned Parenthood doesn’t discuss that in public.
They say abortion is like the teeniest tiny part of their day and they give some ridiculous percentage. I guess they include walking and breathing, sharpening their scalpels, calling 911 to put people back together, mopping blood off the floor, and throwing limbs into biohazard bags as not “abortion time” so yeah, abortion’s just a little part of their day. But Live Action keeps going in there undercover with a camera so the world can hear what abortion clinics are really about. Lila can't really go in anymore because her face has become so well-known in clinics across the country. They have nightmares about her.
Lila Rose and the Live Action posse allow Planned Parenthood employees to reveal themselves in their own horrible words. They’ve exposed Planned Parenthood and other abortion clinics so badly that even the New York Times and the Washington Post were recently forced to cover it. I’m not saying they covered her fairly. According to the media the guy who taped Senator Mitch McConnell joking about Ashley Judd was a hero to democracy while Lila Rose is a “terrorist.”
If hate were an Olympic sport, Planned Parenthood would throw javelins at Lila Rose. Lila Rose is like a pro-life Batman with better hair. They go about their everyday business of murder and all of a sudden Batman’s right behind them and they have no idea how he got there. She just doesn’t have the cape.

Marjorie Dannenfelser - If Lila Rose is kind of ninja-esque, Marjorie Dannenfelser of the pro-life SBA List knocks on the front door with a battering ram. They’re both attempting the same thing but Dannenfelser calls ahead.
And not only does Dannenfelser go after Planned Parenthood she goes after those who support them. Congressman Steve Driehaus…oh wait…I mean former congressman Driehaus was targeted by Dannenfelser and the SBA List and he lost his congressional re-election because they told the world that he voted for public funding of abortion - which he did.
He was so stunned by what happened to him that he actually sued the SBA List for telling the truth about him. Seriously.
The SBA List headed by Dannenfelser launched a grassroots campaign and online action center at and has led the charge to defund the abortion giant. Dannenfelser knows that Planned Parenthood absolutely depends on taxpayer funding. You wouldn’t think suction machines and scissors were all that expensive but they take in an awful lot of taxpayer money. Wisconsin recently defunded Planned Parenthood and they started closing clinics quicker than bookstores. Sheesh, you’d almost think that Planned Parenthood cared more about their bottom line than about women.
Every time Dannenfelser is on television she’s educating people about abortion. She picks off its legislative supporters one by one and it freaks them out. And she calls her shots. At least the ninja makes it quick.
Sidewalk counselors - Nobody irritates Planned Parenthood on a daily basis like sidewalk counselors. Nobody.
While pro-life legislators may be a major long term threat to Planned Parenthood, sidewalk counselors are costing them money every single day. Planned Parenthood hates sidewalk counselors about the same amount that it loves taxpayer funding. And it really loves taxpayer funding.
Sidewalk counselors are the front line of the culture war. But they fight the war using truth and love. They urge women not to go into the clinic. They pray for women and their abortionists. They offer alternatives. Some clinics have closed on days that they know they get bunches of sidewalk counselors just because they’re so effective. In the end, Planned Parenthood loses money when sidewalk counselors show up.
They hate them so much Planned Parenthood attempted to have the government bend the law and file racketeering charges against sidewalk counselors like they were mobsters. You know, because mobsters kill people, make lots of money, and silence opponents by any means possible. Hey, kinda' like Planned Parenthood.

Former Planned Parenthood workers who are now pro-life. Abby Johnson is the latest abortion clinic worker to become pro-life. Few people witness better against Planned Parenthood than actual witnesses. When Abby Johnson became pro-life, Planned Parenthood tried to get the courts to silence her.
You see, when they kill babies the babies are silenced. They’re not used to opponents that talk back. In fact, Planned Parenthood was so bad at dealing with an opponent who talks back that they stupidly filed a restraining order against Abby. Uhm. Restraining orders are actually when people keep trying to get close. Abby Johnson was trying to leave. What they really wanted was silence.
So far, Johnson has been writing articles, books, and spoke at hundreds of pro-life events. So yeah, Planned Parenthood really hates her.

Lila Rose - I mention her again because they really really hate Lila Rose.

Crisis Pregnancy Centers - Planned Parenthood hates CPC's and do everything they can to silence them. You see, many CPC's show women an ultrasound of their unborn child. And that's not good for business.
They know that if a woman sees a picture of her baby, she's a lot less inclined to procure an abortion. In many cities, Planned Parenthood has even wrestled legislators into forcing CPC's to post signs saying they don't perform abortions. I always think that would be fair if these same legislators forced Planned Parenthood to post signs saying, "We kill babies here."
You see, Planned Parenthood says they're all about "choice" but only if that means abortion. They're not actually for offering alternatives to women. Planned Parenthood hates CPC's but they don't really understand them at all because they don't charge for their services. And they're probably jealous too because there's not as much to clean up at the end of the day at a CPC. And there's the whole thing about CPC workers being able to sleep at night and look at themselves in the mirror.

The Pope - The pope is the head of an institution that is essentially the anti-Planned Parenthood.
Whereas the Church takes seriously the words of its founder, God, who told us to “be fruitful and multiply,” Planned Parenthood also takes the words of its founder seriously. Margaret Sanger once reportedly said “The most merciful thing that a large family does to one of its infant members is to kill it." Well, both have stayed pretty true to their founder’s vision, huh?
To the Catholic Church, every life is sacred. Margaret Sanger referred to some people as “human weeds.” Make no mistake, Planned Parenthood sees the Catholic Church as the enemy. They’ve even said that the Church’s teachings “deny the pleasurable and positive aspects of sex.” That, of course, is a lie. I’m always amazed that folks can criticize the Church for being anti-sex and then accuse Catholics of having too many children. Do they not see the connection here? But you see, to them there is no connection. It’s been severed. Sex is a game. And the cost of abortion is the ante you must pay to play. Planned Parenthood hates the Church and the Pope, whoever it is at the time.
But while Planned Parenthood’s ire causes many institutions to crumble, the Church doesn’t Komen to the wishes of Planned Parenthood. The Church doesn’t Komen to anyone. You mess with the Pope and the Church you mess with the Holy Spirit. And the Holy Spirit doesn’t lose. We’ve been told that the gates of Hell will not prevail against the Church. Something tells me those gates look a lot like a Planned Parenthood clinic.

The English language - Planned Parenthood and the entire abortion industry hates clarity of language. You see, Planned Parenthood can’t reveal what they actually do so they torture and twist the language to mask their actions. They talk of procedures, extractions, fetuses, and reproductive rights. But what they really mean is “We kill babies for a price.” Clarity is not a friend of Planned Parenthood. They much prefer murk and obfuscation.

Babies - Planned Parenthood hates babies. Wait, I should be more specific. Planned Parenthood hates living babies. Dead babies look like cash registers to them. And they like cash registers. A lot. Every single giggling baby is a testament against what they do. And while they hate babies in general, their particular hatred of black babies knows no bounds. None. Don’t let anyone tell you otherwise.

Read more: