Monday, August 12, 2013

The Childless By Choice: Both Vanguard And Victims

grasstopsusa.com ^ | 08/12/2013 | Don Feder

Time – The Overpriced News Brochure ($4.99 for 60 pages) - had an intense erotic experience with the cover story in its August 12th issue, "The Childfree Life: When having it all means not having children." Please note the choice of words – not childless but childfree, like cancer-free, as if children are a life-threatening disease, which is pretty much the way the contraceptive left views them.
The organ of elite opinion begins by telling us that today "one in five American women will end their child-bearing years maternity-free, compared to 1 in 10 in the 1970s." In this and other statistics cited, Time hears the joyous tread of progress.
For a glimpse of our future, see Europe and Japan.
When I was in Brussels a few years ago, the only women in the city center pushing strollers with more than one child wore head scarves – the fashion future of Europe. Sir Jonathan Sacks, chief rabbi of Britain, warns: "Europe is dying. We are undergoing the moral equivalent of climate change and no one is talking about it."
Last year, the Japanese bought more adult diapers than baby diapers. In 1990, there were more Japanese over 65 than under 15. By 2050, Japan will have more citizens over 80 than under 15. In 1989, those over 60 were 11.6% of Japan's total population. By 2011, they were 21.2%. Can Time's writers even begin to comprehend what this means for a country, a society, a civilization?
As a solution, the left offers the rationing of medical care, death panels and euthanasia. Or, as Japan's Finance Minister, Taro Aso, put it earlier this year, the elderly should "hurry up and die." Over time, the definition of elderly will expand.
(Excerpt) Read more at grasstopsusa.com ...

T-Shirt