COMING OUT:
Obama’s sudden support of gay marriage, after publicly opposing it
throughout his entire political career, may be prompted by a desperate attempt
to prevent impending damage from an ongoing criminal investigation which has
already produced explosive evidence about his fraudulent identity. Now, based on his bizarre flip-flop, it is
probable that irrefutable evidence has been discovered by the
investigation…about his own homosexual past.
Commentary by Dan Crosby
of the DAILY PEN
NEW YORK, NY – Barack Obama has come to
realize the American electorate can only handle so much bad behavior from an
already illegitimately elected politician, especially when that politician’s
alleged eligibility, illegally obtained through the criminal forgery and
concealment of official government documents, has already been proven by a law
enforcement investigation to be a product of the most prolific crime of identity
fraud ever committed against the American people.
Evidence
discovered by Maricopa County Sheriff Joe Arpaio’s investigation has already
proven to Obama’s political enemies that he is an illegitimate president,
undermining the mainstream liberal media's lies about his professional
life. However, imagine what will happen
to Obama's political value when it is discovered that new evidence shows his
personal life is an epic hypocrisy…to his liberal supporters.
Even an illegitimate office holder like Obama understands
the impending personal damage which would be inflicted by a discovery of
evidence which reveals that his public statements on gay marriage over the past
12 years are in diametric conflict with his own past behavior.
Obama realized this week that such a revelation is
politically fatal, so he betrayed the last vestige of his moral conscience in
order to cover what's left of his credibility.
Prodded by the reality that Arpaio’s investigation is closing in on
his lies, Obama capitulated.
"At
a certain point, I've just concluded that for me personally it is important for
me to go ahead and affirm that I think same-sex couples should be able to get
married," Obama told ABC News.
Engaging
a salacious campaign to protect Obama’s fragile character from his nefarious
past, the mainstream media has refused to report on evidence, including public
testimony from witnesses, which indicates that Barack Obama has a long history
of homosexual behavior throughout most of his adult life.
Now, following
an ongoing investigation by a duly appointed, constitutionally empowered law
enforcement agency, which has already exposed evidence that documents, in the
form of an image of an alleged ‘Certificate of Live Birth’ posted to the
internet in April 2011 and a copy of an alleged 1980 Selective Service
registration card used to validate Obama’s eligibility, have all been forged,
the ongoing criminal inquiry is about to reveal scandalous evidence and
testimony which shows that Obama has not been honest with the public about his
life-long sexual orientation.
Among the
internet media community, especially those with common knowledge about Obama’s
efforts to obscure his past, it has long been suspected that Obama is a ‘closet’
homosexual.
“We have a high
level of moral certainty that that Obama was sexually victimized, in some way,
by elder comrade of Obama’s grandfather, explicit black activist poet, Frank
Marshall Davis in the 1970s,” says TDP editor Pen Johannson.
He continues,
“This deviance may or may not have involved an actual physical relationship, but
it certainly involved exposure to sexually explicit material and pornographic
images which Davis admits to having possessed and which he most certainly
exposed a young Obama to. However, if
you have a clinical understanding of the roots of sexual identity, considering
Obama’s maternally dominated childhood without a father figure...and you read
the things this self admitted rapist (Davis) wrote, it becomes clear that he had
little restraint in selecting sexual victims.
The idea that Obama, during his close relationship with Davis, could have
been caught in a sordid sexual affair is not far-fetched.”
Credible
testimony about Obama’s impulsive sexual escapades with the likes of Larry
Sinclair, a gay socialite with a criminal record, who provided corroborated
evidence of a sexual encounter in Chicago in 1999 with then state Senator Obama,
has also been unreported by the American mainstream media.
The failure by
mainstream media to investigate documented reports of Obama’s ongoing homosexual
relationships in Chicago since 1997, which may have resulted in the murder of
Donald Young, a gay member of Obama’s church who may have possessed intimate
knowledge of Obama’s secret homosexual life, has been widely published
throughout the internet media community.
Johannson says,
“The liberal American mainstream media has become an incubator for the social
abscesses of our time. Barack Obama can
no longer hide from who he is, no thanks to these degenerates. The biggest tragedy exposed by his sudden
flip flop in favor of gay marriage is that he was forced to betray his moral
conscience and traditional marriage. His
failed toil against honesty and the exposure of his homosexual past has forced
him into further deterioration of character by defending the wrong side for
political value.”
Johannson says
the biggest lie told by “gay fascists” is that “everyone who is homosexual, or
once had homosexual experiences, did not have a choice in their sexual
orientation and that their homosexuality is a product of genetic obligation over
which they do not have a choice.”
Therefore, if
Obama had made the better decision by responding to this impending evidence
about his homosexual past by saying that he indeed had homosexual experiences
but that those experiences do not impact his current advocacy for traditional
marriage because he realizes his marriage to Michelle is the result of him
changing his mind about being homosexual, the deranged freaks in the gay
establishment would riot against him for denouncing their lie.
Obama's
irrelevant public endorsement of gay marriage was the first from any
illegitimate, or legitimate, president, and a potentially inciting for his
waning electoral approval. It comes as the gay community remains hypocritical on
the issue of whether the government has a right to intrude on homosexual
relationships at all. Radical gays
violently oppose any government intrusion on their sexuality when invoked upon
by morality laws, yet they seek government intrusion when they want
advocacy.
“A
symptom of homosexual activism is a rank and pathetic hypocrisy when it comes to
the government’s involvement. They want
government out when it doesn’t support them, but they want the government in
when it does,” observes Johannson.
“For
Obama, what’s good for the goose, is great for the pander.”